银行系统稳定性和经济可持续性:关于银行系统稳定性对某些选定发展中国家可持续性影响的面板数据分析

IF 3.2 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Quantitative Finance and Economics Pub Date : 2019-11-28 DOI:10.3934/qfe.2019.4.709
A. H. Ntarmah, Yusheng Kong, M. Gyan
{"title":"银行系统稳定性和经济可持续性:关于银行系统稳定性对某些选定发展中国家可持续性影响的面板数据分析","authors":"A. H. Ntarmah, Yusheng Kong, M. Gyan","doi":"10.3934/qfe.2019.4.709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study investigated the effects of banking system stability on economic sustainability from the perspective of 37 developing economies for the period 2000–2016. The study applied panel data models precisely fixed effects and random effects models. Hausman test of endogeneity revealed fixed effects model as the most appropriate in all estimations. Our empirical analysis revealed the following key findings: First, the study revealed that banking system z-scores has positive effect on economic sustainability of developing economies while banking system regulatory capital and bank credit have negative effects on economic sustainability among selected developing economies. Second, while banking system z-scores, bank liquid assets and bank credit have positive effects on economic sustainability of BRICS economies, bank liquid assets and bank credit have negative effects on economic sustainability of non-BRICS economies except banking system zscores, which has a positive effect. In addition, banking system z-scores has positive effect on economic sustainability of Asian and non-Asian economies. However, non-performing loans and bank credit has negative effects on economic sustainability of Asian economies while banking system regulatory capital has negative effect on economic sustainability of non-Asian economies. We conclude that banking system stability play a role in economic sustainability developing economies. However, banking system stability has differing effects on economic sustainability of BRICS and non-BRICS economies; and Asian and non-Asian economies.","PeriodicalId":45226,"journal":{"name":"Quantitative Finance and Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Banking system stability and economic sustainability: A panel data analysis of the effect of banking system stability on sustainability of some selected developing countries\",\"authors\":\"A. H. Ntarmah, Yusheng Kong, M. Gyan\",\"doi\":\"10.3934/qfe.2019.4.709\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study investigated the effects of banking system stability on economic sustainability from the perspective of 37 developing economies for the period 2000–2016. The study applied panel data models precisely fixed effects and random effects models. Hausman test of endogeneity revealed fixed effects model as the most appropriate in all estimations. Our empirical analysis revealed the following key findings: First, the study revealed that banking system z-scores has positive effect on economic sustainability of developing economies while banking system regulatory capital and bank credit have negative effects on economic sustainability among selected developing economies. Second, while banking system z-scores, bank liquid assets and bank credit have positive effects on economic sustainability of BRICS economies, bank liquid assets and bank credit have negative effects on economic sustainability of non-BRICS economies except banking system zscores, which has a positive effect. In addition, banking system z-scores has positive effect on economic sustainability of Asian and non-Asian economies. However, non-performing loans and bank credit has negative effects on economic sustainability of Asian economies while banking system regulatory capital has negative effect on economic sustainability of non-Asian economies. We conclude that banking system stability play a role in economic sustainability developing economies. However, banking system stability has differing effects on economic sustainability of BRICS and non-BRICS economies; and Asian and non-Asian economies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45226,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quantitative Finance and Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"25\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quantitative Finance and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3934/qfe.2019.4.709\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quantitative Finance and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3934/qfe.2019.4.709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

摘要

该研究从2000-2006年期间37个发展中经济体的角度调查了银行系统稳定性对经济可持续性的影响。该研究应用了精确固定效应和随机效应的面板数据模型。内生性的Hausman检验显示固定效应模型是所有估计中最合适的。我们的实证分析揭示了以下关键发现:首先,研究表明,在选定的发展中经济体中,银行系统z评分对发展中经济的经济可持续性有正向影响,而银行系统监管资本和银行信贷对经济可持续性则有负向影响。其次,银行体系z评分、银行流动资产和银行信贷对金砖国家经济可持续性有正向影响,而银行流动资产、银行信贷对除银行体系z分数外的非金砖国家经济持续性有负向影响,具有正向影响。此外,银行系统z评分对亚洲和非亚洲经济体的经济可持续性具有积极影响。然而,不良贷款和银行信贷对亚洲经济体的经济可持续性有负面影响,而银行体系监管资本对非亚洲经济体经济可持续性则有负面影响。我们得出的结论是,银行体系的稳定在发展中经济体的经济可持续性中发挥着作用。然而,银行体系稳定性对金砖国家和非金砖国家经济体经济可持续性的影响不同;以及亚洲和非亚洲经济体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Banking system stability and economic sustainability: A panel data analysis of the effect of banking system stability on sustainability of some selected developing countries
The study investigated the effects of banking system stability on economic sustainability from the perspective of 37 developing economies for the period 2000–2016. The study applied panel data models precisely fixed effects and random effects models. Hausman test of endogeneity revealed fixed effects model as the most appropriate in all estimations. Our empirical analysis revealed the following key findings: First, the study revealed that banking system z-scores has positive effect on economic sustainability of developing economies while banking system regulatory capital and bank credit have negative effects on economic sustainability among selected developing economies. Second, while banking system z-scores, bank liquid assets and bank credit have positive effects on economic sustainability of BRICS economies, bank liquid assets and bank credit have negative effects on economic sustainability of non-BRICS economies except banking system zscores, which has a positive effect. In addition, banking system z-scores has positive effect on economic sustainability of Asian and non-Asian economies. However, non-performing loans and bank credit has negative effects on economic sustainability of Asian economies while banking system regulatory capital has negative effect on economic sustainability of non-Asian economies. We conclude that banking system stability play a role in economic sustainability developing economies. However, banking system stability has differing effects on economic sustainability of BRICS and non-BRICS economies; and Asian and non-Asian economies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
1.90%
发文量
14
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The effects of different modes of foreign bank entry in the Turkish banking sector during the 2007–2009 Global financial crisis Cost and performance of carbon risk in socially responsible mutual funds Investing in virtue and frowning at vice? Lessons from the global economic and financial crisis Wavelet-based systematic risk estimation for GCC stock markets and impact of the embargo on the Qatar case Autoregressive distributed lag estimation of bank financing and Nigerian manufacturing sector capacity utilization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1