保留肠系膜下动脉左结肠切除术治疗憩室病后吻合口出血的风险:初步结果。

IF 1.3 Q3 Medicine Minerva chirurgica Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08645-9
U. Bracale, R. Peltrini, M. D. Di Nuzzo, G. Altieri, V. Silvestri, P. Dolce, M. D’ambra, R. Lionetti, F. Corcione
{"title":"保留肠系膜下动脉左结肠切除术治疗憩室病后吻合口出血的风险:初步结果。","authors":"U. Bracale, R. Peltrini, M. D. Di Nuzzo, G. Altieri, V. Silvestri, P. Dolce, M. D’ambra, R. Lionetti, F. Corcione","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08645-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nThe inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) preservation in elective laparoscopic left colectomy for diverticular disease may reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage. However, an increased risk of bleeding is assumed. The purpose of this study is to investigate the risk of colorectal anastomosis bleeding, when IMA is resected or preserved during left colectomy.\n\n\nMETHODS\nA retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was performed. All patients who underwent elective left colectomy, from December 2018 to September 2020, were included. Patients' data and clinical information were collected and analyzed. Patients were categorized in two group: IMA resected (IMAR) and IMA preserving (IMA-P) left colectomy. Perioperative outcomes between the two groups were compared.\n\n\nRESULTS\nSixty-three consecutive patients who underwent left colectomy over a period of three years were enrolled: 42 in IMA-R group and 22 in the IMA-P group. There were no significant differences in demographic and intraoperative characteristics between the two groups, except for patients' age and primary disease. Six patients (9.37%) developed anastomotic bleeding during recovery, more frequently in the IMA-P than IMA-R group, although the difference is not statistically significative (13.6% and 7.3%; p=0.406). All bleedings were self-limited and only one needed red blood cells transfusion. Using the bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement (BSLR) has proved to be advantageous in preventing anastomotic bleeding in the IMA-P group.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nIMA preserving left colectomy seems to be associated with a higher risk of mostly selflimited anastomotic bleeding during recovery. BSLR seems to be effective in this group of patients.","PeriodicalId":18714,"journal":{"name":"Minerva chirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk of anastomotic bleeding after left colectomy with preservation of inferior mesenteric artery for diverticular disease: preliminary results.\",\"authors\":\"U. Bracale, R. Peltrini, M. D. Di Nuzzo, G. Altieri, V. Silvestri, P. Dolce, M. D’ambra, R. Lionetti, F. Corcione\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08645-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nThe inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) preservation in elective laparoscopic left colectomy for diverticular disease may reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage. However, an increased risk of bleeding is assumed. The purpose of this study is to investigate the risk of colorectal anastomosis bleeding, when IMA is resected or preserved during left colectomy.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nA retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was performed. All patients who underwent elective left colectomy, from December 2018 to September 2020, were included. Patients' data and clinical information were collected and analyzed. Patients were categorized in two group: IMA resected (IMAR) and IMA preserving (IMA-P) left colectomy. Perioperative outcomes between the two groups were compared.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nSixty-three consecutive patients who underwent left colectomy over a period of three years were enrolled: 42 in IMA-R group and 22 in the IMA-P group. There were no significant differences in demographic and intraoperative characteristics between the two groups, except for patients' age and primary disease. Six patients (9.37%) developed anastomotic bleeding during recovery, more frequently in the IMA-P than IMA-R group, although the difference is not statistically significative (13.6% and 7.3%; p=0.406). All bleedings were self-limited and only one needed red blood cells transfusion. Using the bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement (BSLR) has proved to be advantageous in preventing anastomotic bleeding in the IMA-P group.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nIMA preserving left colectomy seems to be associated with a higher risk of mostly selflimited anastomotic bleeding during recovery. BSLR seems to be effective in this group of patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva chirurgica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva chirurgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08645-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08645-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景选择性腹腔镜左半结肠切除术中保留肠系膜下动脉可降低吻合口瘘的风险。然而,假设出血风险增加。本研究的目的是研究左半结肠切除术中切除或保留IMA时结肠直肠吻合口出血的风险。方法对前瞻性收集的数据库进行回顾性分析。包括2018年12月至2020年9月期间接受选择性左结肠切除术的所有患者。收集并分析患者的数据和临床信息。患者分为两组:IMA切除(IMAR)和IMA保留(IMA-P)左结肠切除术。比较两组患者的围手术期结果。结果在三年内连续接受左半结肠切除术的患者共有三名:IMA-R组42名,IMA-P组22名。除患者年龄和原发疾病外,两组患者的人口统计学和术中特征没有显著差异。6名患者(9.37%)在康复过程中出现吻合口出血,IMA-P组发生吻合口出血的频率高于IMA-R组,尽管差异无统计学意义(13.6%和7.3%;P=0.406)。所有出血均为自身局限性出血,仅一例需要输注红细胞。在IMA-P组中,使用生物可吸收缝合线增强术(BSLR)已被证明在预防吻合口出血方面是有利的。结论:保留左半结肠切除术似乎与康复期间发生大部分自限吻合口出血的风险较高有关。BSLR似乎对这组患者有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk of anastomotic bleeding after left colectomy with preservation of inferior mesenteric artery for diverticular disease: preliminary results.
BACKGROUND The inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) preservation in elective laparoscopic left colectomy for diverticular disease may reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage. However, an increased risk of bleeding is assumed. The purpose of this study is to investigate the risk of colorectal anastomosis bleeding, when IMA is resected or preserved during left colectomy. METHODS A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was performed. All patients who underwent elective left colectomy, from December 2018 to September 2020, were included. Patients' data and clinical information were collected and analyzed. Patients were categorized in two group: IMA resected (IMAR) and IMA preserving (IMA-P) left colectomy. Perioperative outcomes between the two groups were compared. RESULTS Sixty-three consecutive patients who underwent left colectomy over a period of three years were enrolled: 42 in IMA-R group and 22 in the IMA-P group. There were no significant differences in demographic and intraoperative characteristics between the two groups, except for patients' age and primary disease. Six patients (9.37%) developed anastomotic bleeding during recovery, more frequently in the IMA-P than IMA-R group, although the difference is not statistically significative (13.6% and 7.3%; p=0.406). All bleedings were self-limited and only one needed red blood cells transfusion. Using the bioabsorbable staple line reinforcement (BSLR) has proved to be advantageous in preventing anastomotic bleeding in the IMA-P group. CONCLUSIONS IMA preserving left colectomy seems to be associated with a higher risk of mostly selflimited anastomotic bleeding during recovery. BSLR seems to be effective in this group of patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva chirurgica
Minerva chirurgica 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Chirurgica publishes scientific papers on surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of clinical efficacy of suture-fixation mucopexy in the treatment of prolapsed hemorrhoid. Bottom-up suprapubic approach for robotic right colectomy: technical aspects and preliminary outcomes. Orthotopic liver transplantation for patients with end-stage alcohol-related liver disease and severe acute alcohol-related hepatitis: a concise review. Risk of anastomotic bleeding after left colectomy with preservation of inferior mesenteric artery for diverticular disease: preliminary results. Management of intra- and post-operative complications during TEM/TAMIS procedures. A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1