法院的内务管理:一事不再理原则和NCA裁决的地域范围。对法院2022年3月22日Nordzucker判决的案例评论,C-151/20案

K. Dobosz
{"title":"法院的内务管理:一事不再理原则和NCA裁决的地域范围。对法院2022年3月22日Nordzucker判决的案例评论,C-151/20案","authors":"K. Dobosz","doi":"10.7172/1689-9024.yars.2022.15.26.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The case commentary examines the recent ruling of the Court of Justice in the Nordzucker case. This judgment is important not only for the new approach to the ne bis in idem principle in competition law (which was first established in the Bpost case, issued the same day), but also for the clarification of the concept of “idem” with respect to the territorial effects of the infringement on the territories of two member states. The judgment thus provides guidance for the extraterritorial application of EU competition law.","PeriodicalId":36276,"journal":{"name":"Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Housekeeping of the Court of Justice: The ne bis in idem Principle and the Territorial Scope of NCA Decisions. Case Comment to the Nordzucker Judgment of the Court of Justice of 22 March 2022, Case C-151/20\",\"authors\":\"K. Dobosz\",\"doi\":\"10.7172/1689-9024.yars.2022.15.26.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The case commentary examines the recent ruling of the Court of Justice in the Nordzucker case. This judgment is important not only for the new approach to the ne bis in idem principle in competition law (which was first established in the Bpost case, issued the same day), but also for the clarification of the concept of “idem” with respect to the territorial effects of the infringement on the territories of two member states. The judgment thus provides guidance for the extraterritorial application of EU competition law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7172/1689-9024.yars.2022.15.26.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7172/1689-9024.yars.2022.15.26.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

案件评论审查了法院最近对Nordzucker案的裁决。这一判决不仅对竞争法中一事不再理原则的新方法(该原则在Bpost案中首次确立,于同一天发布)很重要,而且对澄清“一事不再”的概念以及侵权行为对两个成员国领土的领土影响也很重要。因此,该判决为欧盟竞争法的域外适用提供了指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Housekeeping of the Court of Justice: The ne bis in idem Principle and the Territorial Scope of NCA Decisions. Case Comment to the Nordzucker Judgment of the Court of Justice of 22 March 2022, Case C-151/20
The case commentary examines the recent ruling of the Court of Justice in the Nordzucker case. This judgment is important not only for the new approach to the ne bis in idem principle in competition law (which was first established in the Bpost case, issued the same day), but also for the clarification of the concept of “idem” with respect to the territorial effects of the infringement on the territories of two member states. The judgment thus provides guidance for the extraterritorial application of EU competition law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Section 19a GWB as the German ‘Lex GAFA’ – lighthouse project or superfluous national solo run? The Digital Markets Act between the EU Economic Constitutionalism and the EU Competition Policy Gateways to the Internet Ecosystem – Enabling and Discovery Tools in the Age of Global Online Platforms The Housekeeping of the Court of Justice: The ne bis in idem Principle and the Territorial Scope of NCA Decisions. Case Comment to the Nordzucker Judgment of the Court of Justice of 22 March 2022, Case C-151/20 Competition law enforcement in Ukraine: challenges from on-line giants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1