平凡的语言与种族:汉娜·皮特金与托尼·莫里森的《串联与张力》

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Polity Pub Date : 2023-05-31 DOI:10.1086/725324
George Shulman
{"title":"平凡的语言与种族:汉娜·皮特金与托尼·莫里森的《串联与张力》","authors":"George Shulman","doi":"10.1086/725324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay focuses on Hanna Pitkin’s understanding of what was at stake for politics and theory in her book on ordinary language philosophy, Wittgenstein and Justice (W&J). It does so by contrasting her preface to the first edition, in 1972, to the preface she wrote for the second edition in 1993, both of which I then compare to Toni Morrison’s 1992 preface to Playing in the Dark. Why Morrison? Morrison’s preface is built around a 1975 novel, The Words to Say It by Maria Cardinale. Her novel exemplifies Pitkin’s claim that ordinary language philosophy and psychoanalytic practice are deeply connected, but Morrison also pushes us beyond Pitkin to consider race and what Morrison called the “word-work” of her own creative fiction-making. By focusing on the novel’s racial subtext, Morrison’s preface presses the fact of racialized social division on Pitkin’s Wittgensteinian idea that ordinary language is a home to return to. Still, Morrison invokes the idea of “shareable language,” and the transformational possibilities in the word-work of truth-telling, in ways that suggest the resonance— and potential extensions—of Pitkin’s 1993 re-imagining of politics and theory.","PeriodicalId":46912,"journal":{"name":"Polity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ordinary Language and Race: Hanna Pitkin and Toni Morrison in Tandem and Tension\",\"authors\":\"George Shulman\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/725324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay focuses on Hanna Pitkin’s understanding of what was at stake for politics and theory in her book on ordinary language philosophy, Wittgenstein and Justice (W&J). It does so by contrasting her preface to the first edition, in 1972, to the preface she wrote for the second edition in 1993, both of which I then compare to Toni Morrison’s 1992 preface to Playing in the Dark. Why Morrison? Morrison’s preface is built around a 1975 novel, The Words to Say It by Maria Cardinale. Her novel exemplifies Pitkin’s claim that ordinary language philosophy and psychoanalytic practice are deeply connected, but Morrison also pushes us beyond Pitkin to consider race and what Morrison called the “word-work” of her own creative fiction-making. By focusing on the novel’s racial subtext, Morrison’s preface presses the fact of racialized social division on Pitkin’s Wittgensteinian idea that ordinary language is a home to return to. Still, Morrison invokes the idea of “shareable language,” and the transformational possibilities in the word-work of truth-telling, in ways that suggest the resonance— and potential extensions—of Pitkin’s 1993 re-imagining of politics and theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polity\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polity\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/725324\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polity","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/725324","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文着重探讨汉娜·皮特金在《普通语言哲学》、《维特根斯坦与正义》一书中对政治和理论利害关系的理解。它通过对比她1972年第一版的序言和1993年第二版的序言来做到这一点,然后我将这两篇序言与托尼·莫里森1992年的《在黑暗中玩耍》序言进行了比较。为什么是莫里森?Morrison的序言是围绕着Maria Cardinale 1975年的一部小说《说出来的话》而写的。她的小说体现了皮特金的主张,即普通语言哲学和精神分析实践之间有着深刻的联系,但莫里森也推动我们超越皮特金,考虑种族和莫里森所说的她自己创造性小说创作的“文字作品”。通过关注小说的种族潜台词,Morrison的序言将种族化的社会分裂事实压在了Pitkin的维特根斯坦思想上,即普通语言是一个可以回归的家园,以某种方式表明了皮特金1993年对政治和理论的重新想象的共鸣——以及潜在的延伸。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ordinary Language and Race: Hanna Pitkin and Toni Morrison in Tandem and Tension
This essay focuses on Hanna Pitkin’s understanding of what was at stake for politics and theory in her book on ordinary language philosophy, Wittgenstein and Justice (W&J). It does so by contrasting her preface to the first edition, in 1972, to the preface she wrote for the second edition in 1993, both of which I then compare to Toni Morrison’s 1992 preface to Playing in the Dark. Why Morrison? Morrison’s preface is built around a 1975 novel, The Words to Say It by Maria Cardinale. Her novel exemplifies Pitkin’s claim that ordinary language philosophy and psychoanalytic practice are deeply connected, but Morrison also pushes us beyond Pitkin to consider race and what Morrison called the “word-work” of her own creative fiction-making. By focusing on the novel’s racial subtext, Morrison’s preface presses the fact of racialized social division on Pitkin’s Wittgensteinian idea that ordinary language is a home to return to. Still, Morrison invokes the idea of “shareable language,” and the transformational possibilities in the word-work of truth-telling, in ways that suggest the resonance— and potential extensions—of Pitkin’s 1993 re-imagining of politics and theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Polity
Polity POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Since its inception in 1968, Polity has been committed to the publication of scholarship reflecting the full variety of approaches to the study of politics. As journals have become more specialized and less accessible to many within the discipline of political science, Polity has remained ecumenical. The editor and editorial board welcome articles intended to be of interest to an entire field (e.g., political theory or international politics) within political science, to the discipline as a whole, and to scholars in related disciplines in the social sciences and the humanities. Scholarship of this type promises to be highly "productive" - that is, to stimulate other scholars to ask fresh questions and reconsider conventional assumptions.
期刊最新文献
Does Size Matter in the Context of the Global South? Theorizing the Smallest States The Unique and the Universal in International Studies Theories from the Global South Ideas from the Global South: Dependency and Decoloniality Incorporating Global South Perspectives in the Study of International Relations: Reflections on the Field Long Day’s Journey Into Night
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1