乌达亚纳的药师在公共卫生中心对病人的药物服务的满意度进行了问卷调查

L. Larasanty, M. Jaya, K. W. Astuti, I. Santika
{"title":"乌达亚纳的药师在公共卫生中心对病人的药物服务的满意度进行了问卷调查","authors":"L. Larasanty, M. Jaya, K. W. Astuti, I. Santika","doi":"10.22146/JMPF.60998","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The implementation of pharmaceutical care by pharmacists at the community health center has been regulated in the Minister of Health Regulation No. 74 of 2016. Based on that regulation, assessment of pharmaceutical care services is needed to ensure the quality of services provided by pharmacists. This study aims to develop an Udayana questionnaire that can be used to evaluate the quality of pharmaceutical care provided by pharmacists at community health centers. This research is quantitative (survey implementation) carried out in 2 phases. The first phase is the design of the Udayana questionnaire. The second phase is to verify the validity and reliability of the questionnaire. The questionnaire validity test was carried out in three stages, namely the logical validity test, content validity, and construct validity. The questionnaire statement develop based on Minister of Health Regulation No. 74 of 2016 obtained 31 statements which are divided into 5 dimensions of service quality. The logical validity test resulted in 30 statements that were declared valid by experts. Content validity test is done by calculating the value of the content validity ratio (CVR) and the value of the content validity index (CVI). The CVR and CVI results showed that 7 statements were eliminated because they were not valid (CVR value <0.99 and CVI <70%). Construct validity test and questionnaire reliability were tested on 384 respondents who had met the inclusion criteria. The construct validity test resulted 23 valid statement (r = 0.148). Results of the reliability test based on Cronbach's Alpha value is greater than 0.6, indicating that all the valid statement items in the Udayana questionnaire are reliable. Based on the results of validity and reliability tests, 23 statements of Udayana's questionnaire are stated valid and reliable and can be used to evaluate the quality of pharmaceutical care at the community health center.","PeriodicalId":33008,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Manajemen dan Pelayanan Farmasi","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pengembangan Kuisioner Udayana untuk Penilaian Kepuasan Pasien terhadap Pelayanan Kefarmasian oleh Apoteker di Pusat Kesehatan Masyarakat\",\"authors\":\"L. Larasanty, M. Jaya, K. W. Astuti, I. Santika\",\"doi\":\"10.22146/JMPF.60998\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The implementation of pharmaceutical care by pharmacists at the community health center has been regulated in the Minister of Health Regulation No. 74 of 2016. Based on that regulation, assessment of pharmaceutical care services is needed to ensure the quality of services provided by pharmacists. This study aims to develop an Udayana questionnaire that can be used to evaluate the quality of pharmaceutical care provided by pharmacists at community health centers. This research is quantitative (survey implementation) carried out in 2 phases. The first phase is the design of the Udayana questionnaire. The second phase is to verify the validity and reliability of the questionnaire. The questionnaire validity test was carried out in three stages, namely the logical validity test, content validity, and construct validity. The questionnaire statement develop based on Minister of Health Regulation No. 74 of 2016 obtained 31 statements which are divided into 5 dimensions of service quality. The logical validity test resulted in 30 statements that were declared valid by experts. Content validity test is done by calculating the value of the content validity ratio (CVR) and the value of the content validity index (CVI). The CVR and CVI results showed that 7 statements were eliminated because they were not valid (CVR value <0.99 and CVI <70%). Construct validity test and questionnaire reliability were tested on 384 respondents who had met the inclusion criteria. The construct validity test resulted 23 valid statement (r = 0.148). Results of the reliability test based on Cronbach's Alpha value is greater than 0.6, indicating that all the valid statement items in the Udayana questionnaire are reliable. Based on the results of validity and reliability tests, 23 statements of Udayana's questionnaire are stated valid and reliable and can be used to evaluate the quality of pharmaceutical care at the community health center.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33008,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Manajemen dan Pelayanan Farmasi\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Manajemen dan Pelayanan Farmasi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22146/JMPF.60998\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Manajemen dan Pelayanan Farmasi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22146/JMPF.60998","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

卫生部长2016年第74号条例对药剂师在社区卫生中心实施药物护理进行了规定。根据该条例,需要对药物护理服务进行评估,以确保药剂师提供的服务质量。本研究旨在开发一份Udayana问卷,用于评估社区卫生中心药剂师提供的药物护理质量。本研究分两个阶段进行定量研究(调查实施)。第一阶段是Udayana问卷的设计。第二阶段是验证问卷的有效性和可靠性。问卷有效性测试分为三个阶段进行,即逻辑有效性测试、内容有效性测试和结构有效性测试。根据卫生部2016年第74号条例制定的调查表共获得31份,分为服务质量的5个维度。逻辑有效性测试得出了30项声明,专家们宣布这些声明有效。内容有效性测试是通过计算内容有效性比率(CVR)的值和内容有效性指数(CVI)的值来进行的。CVR和CVI结果显示,有7项陈述因无效而被删除(CVR值<0.99,CVI<70%)。对384名符合纳入标准的受访者进行了结构有效性测试和问卷信度测试。结构有效性检验得到23个有效陈述(r=0.148)。基于Cronbach’s Alpha值的信度检验结果大于0.6,表明Udayana问卷中的所有有效陈述项目都是可靠的。根据有效性和可靠性测试结果,Udayana问卷中的23项陈述是有效和可靠的,可用于评估社区卫生中心的药物护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Pengembangan Kuisioner Udayana untuk Penilaian Kepuasan Pasien terhadap Pelayanan Kefarmasian oleh Apoteker di Pusat Kesehatan Masyarakat
The implementation of pharmaceutical care by pharmacists at the community health center has been regulated in the Minister of Health Regulation No. 74 of 2016. Based on that regulation, assessment of pharmaceutical care services is needed to ensure the quality of services provided by pharmacists. This study aims to develop an Udayana questionnaire that can be used to evaluate the quality of pharmaceutical care provided by pharmacists at community health centers. This research is quantitative (survey implementation) carried out in 2 phases. The first phase is the design of the Udayana questionnaire. The second phase is to verify the validity and reliability of the questionnaire. The questionnaire validity test was carried out in three stages, namely the logical validity test, content validity, and construct validity. The questionnaire statement develop based on Minister of Health Regulation No. 74 of 2016 obtained 31 statements which are divided into 5 dimensions of service quality. The logical validity test resulted in 30 statements that were declared valid by experts. Content validity test is done by calculating the value of the content validity ratio (CVR) and the value of the content validity index (CVI). The CVR and CVI results showed that 7 statements were eliminated because they were not valid (CVR value <0.99 and CVI <70%). Construct validity test and questionnaire reliability were tested on 384 respondents who had met the inclusion criteria. The construct validity test resulted 23 valid statement (r = 0.148). Results of the reliability test based on Cronbach's Alpha value is greater than 0.6, indicating that all the valid statement items in the Udayana questionnaire are reliable. Based on the results of validity and reliability tests, 23 statements of Udayana's questionnaire are stated valid and reliable and can be used to evaluate the quality of pharmaceutical care at the community health center.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative Study of Cycle Threshold RT-PCR SARS Cov-2 between Saliva Specimen and Nasopharyngeal Swab Survei Kesediaan Menggunakan Telemedicine Pada Mahasiswa Farmasi Di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta THE ASSESSMENT OF PATIENT SAFETY CULTURE AMONG DOCTORS, NURSES AND PHARMACISTS IN A PUBLIC HOSPITAL IN INDONESIA Factor Affecting Job Satisfaction In Community Pharmacists: A Review Pengetahuan Masyarakat Tentang Penggunaan Suplemen Vitamin untuk Meningkatkan Imunitas Tubuh Selama Pandemi COVID-19 di Kelurahan Klender, Jakarta Timur dan Kecamatan Panimbang, Banten
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1