在科学出版中滥用大型语言模型（如ChatGPT）的风险：作者身份、掠夺性出版和造纸厂

IF 2.2 3区管理学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Learned Publishing Pub Date : 2023-09-08 DOI:10.1002/leap.1578

Graham Kendall, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva

{"title":"在科学出版中滥用大型语言模型（如ChatGPT）的风险：作者身份、掠夺性出版和造纸厂","authors":"Graham Kendall, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva","doi":"10.1002/leap.1578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>\n </p><ul>\n \n <li>Academia is already witnessing the abuse of authorship in papers with text generated by large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT.</li>\n \n <li>LLM-generated text is testing the limits of publishing ethics as we traditionally know it.</li>\n \n <li>We alert the community to imminent risks of LLM technologies, like ChatGPT, for amplifying the predatory publishing ‘industry’.</li>\n \n <li>The abuse of ChatGPT for the paper mill industry cannot be over-emphasized.</li>\n \n <li>Detection of LLM-generated text is the responsibility of editors and journals/publishers.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51636,"journal":{"name":"Learned Publishing","volume":"37 1","pages":"55-62"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leap.1578","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risks of abuse of large language models, like ChatGPT, in scientific publishing: Authorship, predatory publishing, and paper mills\",\"authors\":\"Graham Kendall, Jaime A. Teixeira da Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/leap.1578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>\\n </p><ul>\\n \\n <li>Academia is already witnessing the abuse of authorship in papers with text generated by large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT.</li>\\n \\n <li>LLM-generated text is testing the limits of publishing ethics as we traditionally know it.</li>\\n \\n <li>We alert the community to imminent risks of LLM technologies, like ChatGPT, for amplifying the predatory publishing ‘industry’.</li>\\n \\n <li>The abuse of ChatGPT for the paper mill industry cannot be over-emphasized.</li>\\n \\n <li>Detection of LLM-generated text is the responsibility of editors and journals/publishers.</li>\\n </ul>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51636,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learned Publishing\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"55-62\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/leap.1578\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learned Publishing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1578\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learned Publishing","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1578","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

学术界已经目睹了由ChatGPT等大型语言模型(llm)生成文本的论文中作者身份的滥用。法学硕士生成的文本正在测试我们传统上所知道的出版伦理的极限。我们提醒社区，法学硕士技术(如ChatGPT)可能会放大掠夺性出版“行业”。ChatGPT对造纸厂行业的滥用再怎么强调也不为过。检测法学硕士生成的文本是编辑和期刊/出版商的责任。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Risks of abuse of large language models, like ChatGPT, in scientific publishing: Authorship, predatory publishing, and paper mills

Academia is already witnessing the abuse of authorship in papers with text generated by large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT.
LLM-generated text is testing the limits of publishing ethics as we traditionally know it.
We alert the community to imminent risks of LLM technologies, like ChatGPT, for amplifying the predatory publishing ‘industry’.
The abuse of ChatGPT for the paper mill industry cannot be over-emphasized.
Detection of LLM-generated text is the responsibility of editors and journals/publishers.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Learned Publishing INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-

CiteScore

4.40

自引率

17.90%

发文量