水下无线传感器网络中不同TCP拥塞机制的性能评估

Hajar Bennouri, A. Berqia
{"title":"水下无线传感器网络中不同TCP拥塞机制的性能评估","authors":"Hajar Bennouri, A. Berqia","doi":"10.1504/ijvics.2020.10029233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Data transmission in Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks (UWSNs) is one of the key enablers used in technologies for future ocean-monitoring systems and other underwater applications. The use of acoustic waves in UWSNs suffer from a high propagation delay, as well as a limited available bandwidth due to the high-noise level, making the use of the different traditional existing protocols a major challenge in this environment. In this paper, we have chosen two TCP mechanisms already defined: TCP Vegas and TCP New Reno, to evaluate the effects of variable TCP packet size and TCP connection density in a subsea network under two common routing protocols, namely AODV and DSDV. The simulation results show that the performances of the two TCPs using DSDV routing protocol provide a more efficient result than those using the AODV routing protocol and that New Reno TCP gives better results than Vegas TCP in the UWSNs.","PeriodicalId":39333,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Vehicle Information and Communication Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the performance of different TCP congestion mechanisms in underwater wireless sensor networks\",\"authors\":\"Hajar Bennouri, A. Berqia\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/ijvics.2020.10029233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Data transmission in Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks (UWSNs) is one of the key enablers used in technologies for future ocean-monitoring systems and other underwater applications. The use of acoustic waves in UWSNs suffer from a high propagation delay, as well as a limited available bandwidth due to the high-noise level, making the use of the different traditional existing protocols a major challenge in this environment. In this paper, we have chosen two TCP mechanisms already defined: TCP Vegas and TCP New Reno, to evaluate the effects of variable TCP packet size and TCP connection density in a subsea network under two common routing protocols, namely AODV and DSDV. The simulation results show that the performances of the two TCPs using DSDV routing protocol provide a more efficient result than those using the AODV routing protocol and that New Reno TCP gives better results than Vegas TCP in the UWSNs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Vehicle Information and Communication Systems\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Vehicle Information and Communication Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijvics.2020.10029233\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Vehicle Information and Communication Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijvics.2020.10029233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

水下无线传感器网络(UWSN)中的数据传输是未来海洋监测系统和其他水下应用技术中使用的关键推动者之一。UWSN中声波的使用受到高传播延迟的影响,以及由于高噪声水平而导致的有限可用带宽,使得在这种环境中使用不同的传统现有协议成为一个主要挑战。在本文中,我们选择了两种已经定义的TCP机制:TCP Vegas和TCP New Reno,以评估在两种常见的路由协议(即AODV和DSDV)下,海底网络中可变TCP数据包大小和TCP连接密度的影响。仿真结果表明,在UWSN中,使用DSDV路由协议的两个TCP比使用AODV路由协议提供了更有效的结果,并且New Reno TCP比Vegas TCP提供了更好的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the performance of different TCP congestion mechanisms in underwater wireless sensor networks
Data transmission in Underwater Wireless Sensor Networks (UWSNs) is one of the key enablers used in technologies for future ocean-monitoring systems and other underwater applications. The use of acoustic waves in UWSNs suffer from a high propagation delay, as well as a limited available bandwidth due to the high-noise level, making the use of the different traditional existing protocols a major challenge in this environment. In this paper, we have chosen two TCP mechanisms already defined: TCP Vegas and TCP New Reno, to evaluate the effects of variable TCP packet size and TCP connection density in a subsea network under two common routing protocols, namely AODV and DSDV. The simulation results show that the performances of the two TCPs using DSDV routing protocol provide a more efficient result than those using the AODV routing protocol and that New Reno TCP gives better results than Vegas TCP in the UWSNs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Vehicle Information and Communication Systems
International Journal of Vehicle Information and Communication Systems Computer Science-Computer Science Applications
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Route forecasting-based authentication scheme using A* algorithm in vehicular communication network Vehicle parallel integrated control strategy based on coordinated SAS and ABS Machine learning for efficient link adaptation strategy in VANETs Driving style recognition of highway-driving semi-trailer at different altitudes Research on the application of multiple target cluster intelligent algorithm in the design of door-to-door carriage of cargoes in railway carriage enterprises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1