阐释中国英语教师对理论学习体验的矛盾认知

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Ethnography and Education Pub Date : 2021-11-17 DOI:10.1080/17457823.2021.2005649
Chunmei Yan, Chuanjun He
{"title":"阐释中国英语教师对理论学习体验的矛盾认知","authors":"Chunmei Yan, Chuanjun He","doi":"10.1080/17457823.2021.2005649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Theory-practice gap has been a long-standing challenge in teacher education, however, there has been scarce attention to student teachers’ theory learning experiences. This ethnographic study aimed to examine Chinese EFL (English as a foreign language) M.E.d. student teachers’ perceptions of the value of theory and their experiences of theory learning on the Master of Education programme. Four triangulated sources of data were employed, including student teachers’ portfolios of written responses to academic papers and reflections on their two-stage school experiences, longitudinal participant observations, course evaluations, and focus groups. It was found that the student teachers held paradoxical perceptions about theory learning. They endorsed the importance of theories, but resisted the mainstream theory learning methods which heavily relied on de-contextualised lecturing by teacher educators. To enhance student teachers’ theory learning experiences requires teacher educators’ overall instructional transformations, increased opportunities for reflective learning-to-teach experiences, and student teachers’ attitudinal change and sustained efforts.","PeriodicalId":46203,"journal":{"name":"Ethnography and Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Illuminating Chinese EFL student teachers’ paradoxical perceptions of theory learning experiences\",\"authors\":\"Chunmei Yan, Chuanjun He\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17457823.2021.2005649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Theory-practice gap has been a long-standing challenge in teacher education, however, there has been scarce attention to student teachers’ theory learning experiences. This ethnographic study aimed to examine Chinese EFL (English as a foreign language) M.E.d. student teachers’ perceptions of the value of theory and their experiences of theory learning on the Master of Education programme. Four triangulated sources of data were employed, including student teachers’ portfolios of written responses to academic papers and reflections on their two-stage school experiences, longitudinal participant observations, course evaluations, and focus groups. It was found that the student teachers held paradoxical perceptions about theory learning. They endorsed the importance of theories, but resisted the mainstream theory learning methods which heavily relied on de-contextualised lecturing by teacher educators. To enhance student teachers’ theory learning experiences requires teacher educators’ overall instructional transformations, increased opportunities for reflective learning-to-teach experiences, and student teachers’ attitudinal change and sustained efforts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ethnography and Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ethnography and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2021.2005649\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnography and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17457823.2021.2005649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理论与实践的差距一直是教师教育面临的挑战,然而,对师生理论学习经历的关注却很少。本民族志研究旨在考察中国EFL(英语作为外语)硕士生教师对理论价值的认知以及他们在教育硕士课程中的理论学习经历。采用了四个三角数据来源,包括师生对学术论文的书面回应和对两阶段学校经历的反思、纵向参与者观察、课程评估和焦点小组。研究发现,师生对理论学习存在着矛盾的认知。他们赞同理论的重要性,但反对主流的理论学习方法,这种方法在很大程度上依赖于教师教育者去语境化的授课。要提高学生教师的理论学习体验,需要教师教育者进行全面的教学改革,增加反思性学习的机会来教授经验,以及学生教师的态度转变和持续努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Illuminating Chinese EFL student teachers’ paradoxical perceptions of theory learning experiences
ABSTRACT Theory-practice gap has been a long-standing challenge in teacher education, however, there has been scarce attention to student teachers’ theory learning experiences. This ethnographic study aimed to examine Chinese EFL (English as a foreign language) M.E.d. student teachers’ perceptions of the value of theory and their experiences of theory learning on the Master of Education programme. Four triangulated sources of data were employed, including student teachers’ portfolios of written responses to academic papers and reflections on their two-stage school experiences, longitudinal participant observations, course evaluations, and focus groups. It was found that the student teachers held paradoxical perceptions about theory learning. They endorsed the importance of theories, but resisted the mainstream theory learning methods which heavily relied on de-contextualised lecturing by teacher educators. To enhance student teachers’ theory learning experiences requires teacher educators’ overall instructional transformations, increased opportunities for reflective learning-to-teach experiences, and student teachers’ attitudinal change and sustained efforts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ethnography and Education
Ethnography and Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Ethnography and Education is an international, peer-reviewed journal publishing articles that illuminate educational practices through empirical methodologies, which prioritise the experiences and perspectives of those involved. The journal is open to a wide range of ethnographic research that emanates from the perspectives of sociology, linguistics, history, psychology and general educational studies as well as anthropology. The journal’s priority is to support ethnographic research that involves long-term engagement with those studied in order to understand their cultures, uses multiple methods of generating data, and recognises the centrality of the researcher in the research process. The journal welcomes substantive and methodological articles that seek to explicate and challenge the effects of educational policies and practices; interrogate and develop theories about educational structures, policies and experiences; highlight the agency of educational actors; and provide accounts of how the everyday practices of those engaged in education are instrumental in social reproduction.
期刊最新文献
Ethical dilemmas of translanguaging pedagogy in L2 and basic literacy education for adults: social justice and ethics of care Playing the ‘pibe chorro’ game: masculine skills and legitimate peripheral participation in street culture Socio-spatial networks and capital in small rural primary school voluntary activity ‘And here is a caterpillar kindergarten’: Latin American children transforming school practices at home during the pandemic ‘What’s he writing in there?’ Reciprocal field relations and relational curiosity in ethnographies of education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1