结肠直肠手术中的导尿管。目前的做法和改进,以便能够迅速清除:一项横断面研究。

IF 1.3 Q3 Medicine Minerva chirurgica Pub Date : 2020-09-25 DOI:10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08341-8
X. Serra‐Aracil, Arturo Domínguez, L. Mora-López, Josephine Hidalgo, A. Pallisera-Lloveras, S. Serra-Pla, J. Badia-Closa, A. Garcia-Nalda, S. Navarro-Soto
{"title":"结肠直肠手术中的导尿管。目前的做法和改进,以便能够迅速清除:一项横断面研究。","authors":"X. Serra‐Aracil, Arturo Domínguez, L. Mora-López, Josephine Hidalgo, A. Pallisera-Lloveras, S. Serra-Pla, J. Badia-Closa, A. Garcia-Nalda, S. Navarro-Soto","doi":"10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08341-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION\nDespite the publication of the Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS), attitudes to urinary catheter (UC) management vary widely in colorectal surgery. Objective - The aim of the present study is to define current practices in UC management in colorectal surgery.\n\n\nMETHODS\nCross-sectional observational study carried out in March-April 2019, based on the responses to a survey administered to public hospitals in Catalonia. Respondents were asked about their observance of ERAS programs, the percentage of laparoscopic procedures performed, and the time of UC withdrawal in surgery of the colon and rectum.\n\n\nRESULTS\nForty-three of 45 hospitals contacted eventually responded (95.6%). As two hospitals reported that they did not perform colorectal surgery, the study is based on the results from 41 centers. Thirty-five (85.4%) reported following ERAS programs; 30 (73.2%) have Coloproctology units, and 39 (95.1%) perform more than 70% of colorectal surgeries by laparoscopy. In colon surgery, 27 (65.9%) remove the UC at 24 h, and 12 (29.3%) on day 2 or day 3. In rectal surgery, 17 (58.6%) remove the UC on day 2-3.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nManagement of UC in colon and rectal surgery varies widely. There is clearly room for improvement in UC management, but needs to be thoroughly assessed in randomized multicenter studies.","PeriodicalId":18714,"journal":{"name":"Minerva chirurgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urinary catheter in colorectal surgery. Current practices and improvements in order to allow prompt removal: a cross-sectional study.\",\"authors\":\"X. Serra‐Aracil, Arturo Domínguez, L. Mora-López, Josephine Hidalgo, A. Pallisera-Lloveras, S. Serra-Pla, J. Badia-Closa, A. Garcia-Nalda, S. Navarro-Soto\",\"doi\":\"10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08341-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION\\nDespite the publication of the Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS), attitudes to urinary catheter (UC) management vary widely in colorectal surgery. Objective - The aim of the present study is to define current practices in UC management in colorectal surgery.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nCross-sectional observational study carried out in March-April 2019, based on the responses to a survey administered to public hospitals in Catalonia. Respondents were asked about their observance of ERAS programs, the percentage of laparoscopic procedures performed, and the time of UC withdrawal in surgery of the colon and rectum.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nForty-three of 45 hospitals contacted eventually responded (95.6%). As two hospitals reported that they did not perform colorectal surgery, the study is based on the results from 41 centers. Thirty-five (85.4%) reported following ERAS programs; 30 (73.2%) have Coloproctology units, and 39 (95.1%) perform more than 70% of colorectal surgeries by laparoscopy. In colon surgery, 27 (65.9%) remove the UC at 24 h, and 12 (29.3%) on day 2 or day 3. In rectal surgery, 17 (58.6%) remove the UC on day 2-3.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nManagement of UC in colon and rectal surgery varies widely. There is clearly room for improvement in UC management, but needs to be thoroughly assessed in randomized multicenter studies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minerva chirurgica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minerva chirurgica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08341-8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva chirurgica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.20.08341-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

引言尽管发表了《术后增强恢复指南》(ERAS),但在结直肠手术中,对导尿管(UC)管理的态度差异很大。目的:本研究的目的是确定目前在结直肠手术中UC管理的实践。方法2019年3月至4月进行的横断面观察性研究,基于对加泰罗尼亚公立医院调查的回应。受访者被问及他们对ERAS程序的遵守情况、腹腔镜手术的百分比以及结肠和直肠手术中UC退出的时间。结果在联系的45家医院中,有三家最终做出了回应(95.6%)。由于两家医院报告称他们没有进行结直肠手术,该研究基于41个中心的结果。35人(85.4%)报告了以下ERAS项目;30例(73.2%)有结肠直肠科,39例(95.1%)通过腹腔镜进行70%以上的结肠直肠手术。在结肠手术中,27例(65.9%)在24小时内切除UC,12例(29.3%)在第2天或第3天切除UC。在直肠手术中,有17例(58.6%)在第2-3天切除了UC。结论结肠和直肠手术中UC的治疗差异很大。UC的管理显然还有改进的空间,但需要在随机多中心研究中进行彻底评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Urinary catheter in colorectal surgery. Current practices and improvements in order to allow prompt removal: a cross-sectional study.
INTRODUCTION Despite the publication of the Guidelines for Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS), attitudes to urinary catheter (UC) management vary widely in colorectal surgery. Objective - The aim of the present study is to define current practices in UC management in colorectal surgery. METHODS Cross-sectional observational study carried out in March-April 2019, based on the responses to a survey administered to public hospitals in Catalonia. Respondents were asked about their observance of ERAS programs, the percentage of laparoscopic procedures performed, and the time of UC withdrawal in surgery of the colon and rectum. RESULTS Forty-three of 45 hospitals contacted eventually responded (95.6%). As two hospitals reported that they did not perform colorectal surgery, the study is based on the results from 41 centers. Thirty-five (85.4%) reported following ERAS programs; 30 (73.2%) have Coloproctology units, and 39 (95.1%) perform more than 70% of colorectal surgeries by laparoscopy. In colon surgery, 27 (65.9%) remove the UC at 24 h, and 12 (29.3%) on day 2 or day 3. In rectal surgery, 17 (58.6%) remove the UC on day 2-3. CONCLUSIONS Management of UC in colon and rectal surgery varies widely. There is clearly room for improvement in UC management, but needs to be thoroughly assessed in randomized multicenter studies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva chirurgica
Minerva chirurgica 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Chirurgica publishes scientific papers on surgery. Manuscripts may be submitted in the form of editorials, original articles, review articles, case reports, special articles, letters to the Editor and guidelines. The journal aims to provide its readers with papers of the highest quality and impact through a process of careful peer review and editorial work.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of clinical efficacy of suture-fixation mucopexy in the treatment of prolapsed hemorrhoid. Bottom-up suprapubic approach for robotic right colectomy: technical aspects and preliminary outcomes. Orthotopic liver transplantation for patients with end-stage alcohol-related liver disease and severe acute alcohol-related hepatitis: a concise review. Risk of anastomotic bleeding after left colectomy with preservation of inferior mesenteric artery for diverticular disease: preliminary results. Management of intra- and post-operative complications during TEM/TAMIS procedures. A systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1