{"title":"汽车事故中的最终意图和自觉内疚:阿根廷刑法的观点","authors":"C. Pérez","doi":"10.17981/JURIDCUC.13.1.2017.10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Legal doctrine and case law doctrine about the difference between fraud and conscious guilt are not undisputed. In some situations, like traffic accidents, the difference is difficult to establish. This paper will focus on the analysis of this theme and try to give an answer from the contemporary criminal theory and, thus, study if there is a solution to this current problem and examine if these conducts are intentional or negligent types.","PeriodicalId":40796,"journal":{"name":"Juridicas CUC","volume":"13 1","pages":"213-232"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"El dolo eventual y la culpa consciente en los accidentes automovilísticos: la perspectiva desde el derecho penal argentino\",\"authors\":\"C. Pérez\",\"doi\":\"10.17981/JURIDCUC.13.1.2017.10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Legal doctrine and case law doctrine about the difference between fraud and conscious guilt are not undisputed. In some situations, like traffic accidents, the difference is difficult to establish. This paper will focus on the analysis of this theme and try to give an answer from the contemporary criminal theory and, thus, study if there is a solution to this current problem and examine if these conducts are intentional or negligent types.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40796,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Juridicas CUC\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"213-232\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Juridicas CUC\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17981/JURIDCUC.13.1.2017.10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridicas CUC","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17981/JURIDCUC.13.1.2017.10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
El dolo eventual y la culpa consciente en los accidentes automovilísticos: la perspectiva desde el derecho penal argentino
Legal doctrine and case law doctrine about the difference between fraud and conscious guilt are not undisputed. In some situations, like traffic accidents, the difference is difficult to establish. This paper will focus on the analysis of this theme and try to give an answer from the contemporary criminal theory and, thus, study if there is a solution to this current problem and examine if these conducts are intentional or negligent types.