估计PLS-SEM和PLSc-SEM的调节效应:相互作用项生成*数据处理

Jan-Michael Becker, C. Ringle, M. Sarstedt
{"title":"估计PLS-SEM和PLSc-SEM的调节效应:相互作用项生成*数据处理","authors":"Jan-Michael Becker, C. Ringle, M. Sarstedt","doi":"10.47263/jasem.2(2)01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"When estimating moderating effects in partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLSSEM), researchers can choose from a variety of approaches to model the influence of a moderator on a relationship between two constructs by generating different interaction terms. While prior research has evaluated the efficacy of these approaches in the context of PLS-SEM, the impact of different data treatment options on their performance in the context of standard PLS-SEM and consistent PLS-SEM (PLSc-SEM) is as yet unexplored. Our simulation study addresses these limitations and explores if the choice of approach and data treatment option has a pronounced impact on the methods’ parameter recovery. An empirical application substantiates these findings. Based on our results, we offer recommendations for researchers wishing to estimate moderating effects by means of PLS-SEM and PLSc-SEM.","PeriodicalId":33617,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"141","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ESTIMATING MODERATING EFFECTS IN PLS-SEM AND PLSc-SEM: INTERACTION TERM GENERATION*DATA TREATMENT\",\"authors\":\"Jan-Michael Becker, C. Ringle, M. Sarstedt\",\"doi\":\"10.47263/jasem.2(2)01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"When estimating moderating effects in partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLSSEM), researchers can choose from a variety of approaches to model the influence of a moderator on a relationship between two constructs by generating different interaction terms. While prior research has evaluated the efficacy of these approaches in the context of PLS-SEM, the impact of different data treatment options on their performance in the context of standard PLS-SEM and consistent PLS-SEM (PLSc-SEM) is as yet unexplored. Our simulation study addresses these limitations and explores if the choice of approach and data treatment option has a pronounced impact on the methods’ parameter recovery. An empirical application substantiates these findings. Based on our results, we offer recommendations for researchers wishing to estimate moderating effects by means of PLS-SEM and PLSc-SEM.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"141\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47263/jasem.2(2)01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Decision Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47263/jasem.2(2)01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Decision Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 141

摘要

在偏最小二乘结构方程模型(PLSSEM)中估计调节效应时,研究人员可以选择多种方法,通过生成不同的相互作用项来模拟调节因子对两个构念之间关系的影响。虽然之前的研究已经评估了这些方法在PLS-SEM背景下的有效性,但不同的数据处理选项对其在标准PLS-SEM和一致PLS-SEM (PLS-SEM)背景下的性能的影响尚未被探索。我们的模拟研究解决了这些局限性,并探讨了方法和数据处理选项的选择是否对方法的参数恢复有显著影响。一个实证应用证实了这些发现。基于我们的结果,我们为希望通过PLS-SEM和PLS-SEM估计调节效应的研究人员提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ESTIMATING MODERATING EFFECTS IN PLS-SEM AND PLSc-SEM: INTERACTION TERM GENERATION*DATA TREATMENT
When estimating moderating effects in partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLSSEM), researchers can choose from a variety of approaches to model the influence of a moderator on a relationship between two constructs by generating different interaction terms. While prior research has evaluated the efficacy of these approaches in the context of PLS-SEM, the impact of different data treatment options on their performance in the context of standard PLS-SEM and consistent PLS-SEM (PLSc-SEM) is as yet unexplored. Our simulation study addresses these limitations and explores if the choice of approach and data treatment option has a pronounced impact on the methods’ parameter recovery. An empirical application substantiates these findings. Based on our results, we offer recommendations for researchers wishing to estimate moderating effects by means of PLS-SEM and PLSc-SEM.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling
Journal of Applied Structural Equation Modeling Business, Management and Accounting-Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
ANTECEDENTS OF PERCEIVED USEFULNESS OF NEGATIVE REVIEWS AND PURCHASE INTENTION BASED ON THE SEM AND FSQCA APPROACHES MODELING THE EFFECT OF HIGHER-ORDER THINKING SKILLS AND TECHNOLOGICAL PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE ON STUDENTS’ DIGITAL LITERACY INSTITUTIONAL PRESSURES AND GREEN INNOVATION: A CASE OF CHINESE CHEMICAL COMPANIES COMPLEX ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR OF INVESTORS TO MARKET DYNAMICS: A PLS-SEM ANALYSIS ADDRESSING COMMON METHOD BIAS, OPERATIONALIZATION, SAMPLING, AND DATA COLLECTION ISSUES IN QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH: REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1