解决平等而不关注种族和种族主义的困境

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH EDUCATIONAL FORUM Pub Date : 2021-11-19 DOI:10.1080/00131725.2022.1997524
Michael O'neill
{"title":"解决平等而不关注种族和种族主义的困境","authors":"Michael O'neill","doi":"10.1080/00131725.2022.1997524","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper provides an analysis of one state’s Response to Intervention (RTI) model, bringing to light two predicaments that plague efforts to address disproportionality and support learning: 1) That RTI may continue to perpetuate disproportionality, both in the model’s tiers of support as well as in the placement of students in special education, and 2) That RTI relies on quality instruction but provides little leverage to intervene on that instruction.","PeriodicalId":46482,"journal":{"name":"EDUCATIONAL FORUM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Predicaments of Addressing Equity without Attending to Race and Racism\",\"authors\":\"Michael O'neill\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00131725.2022.1997524\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper provides an analysis of one state’s Response to Intervention (RTI) model, bringing to light two predicaments that plague efforts to address disproportionality and support learning: 1) That RTI may continue to perpetuate disproportionality, both in the model’s tiers of support as well as in the placement of students in special education, and 2) That RTI relies on quality instruction but provides little leverage to intervene on that instruction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EDUCATIONAL FORUM\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EDUCATIONAL FORUM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2022.1997524\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDUCATIONAL FORUM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00131725.2022.1997524","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了一个州的干预反应(RTI)模型,揭示了困扰解决歧化和支持学习努力的两个困境:1)在模型的支持层次和特殊教育学生的安置方面,RTI可能会继续使歧化现象长期存在;2)RTI依赖于高质量的教学,但对教学的干预作用很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Predicaments of Addressing Equity without Attending to Race and Racism
Abstract This paper provides an analysis of one state’s Response to Intervention (RTI) model, bringing to light two predicaments that plague efforts to address disproportionality and support learning: 1) That RTI may continue to perpetuate disproportionality, both in the model’s tiers of support as well as in the placement of students in special education, and 2) That RTI relies on quality instruction but provides little leverage to intervene on that instruction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EDUCATIONAL FORUM
EDUCATIONAL FORUM EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
Editorial Statement Cultivating Supportive School Environments during and after Shared Trauma Institutional Structures as Mediators for Diversifying State Education Policymaking Bodies Co-Teaching from an Interdisciplinary Perspective: A Self-Study of Negotiating an Integrated Curriculum Examining the Situative Progression of Teachers’ Novice-To-Expert Development in Education Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1