科学理论对会计学院发展的适应性评价

N. Semenyshena, N. Khorunzhak, I. Sadovska
{"title":"科学理论对会计学院发展的适应性评价","authors":"N. Semenyshena, N. Khorunzhak, I. Sadovska","doi":"10.13165/ie-20-14-1-07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study is devoted to the development of theoretical foundations and the formalization of the method for assessing the adaptability of existing scientific concepts for the purposes of developing accounting, and is based on an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of scientific concepts when applied to research on accounting and the development of its theory. The article uses empirical analysis for assessment of the feasibility of applying a specific scientific concept, formalized in accordance with reasonable criteria. These criteria include: grouping based on the presence of common features; analyzing the principles of compliance with the principles of the concept of accounting; and empirical assessment of the impact of the concept on the methodology of accounting through predicting the negative consequences of its application. Research results indicate that the application of various scientific concepts and theories in the development of accounting does not always contribute to the solution of accounting problems and tasks. In order to minimize the risks of choosing a false basis for scientific research in the field of accounting, a method for evaluating the effectiveness of the concepts of scientific change has been proposed. The novelty of the proposed approach is that, unlike the existing ones, it allows the mathematical identification of the concept’s adaptability and is based on digital values. Thanks to its use, an informed choice of the most effective concept for researching and solving accounting problems is ensured, which makes it possible to avoid choosing a false basis of scientific research.","PeriodicalId":37115,"journal":{"name":"Intellectual Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EVALUATION OF THE ADAPTABILITY OF SCIENTIFIC THEORIES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ACCOUNTING INSTITUTE\",\"authors\":\"N. Semenyshena, N. Khorunzhak, I. Sadovska\",\"doi\":\"10.13165/ie-20-14-1-07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study is devoted to the development of theoretical foundations and the formalization of the method for assessing the adaptability of existing scientific concepts for the purposes of developing accounting, and is based on an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of scientific concepts when applied to research on accounting and the development of its theory. The article uses empirical analysis for assessment of the feasibility of applying a specific scientific concept, formalized in accordance with reasonable criteria. These criteria include: grouping based on the presence of common features; analyzing the principles of compliance with the principles of the concept of accounting; and empirical assessment of the impact of the concept on the methodology of accounting through predicting the negative consequences of its application. Research results indicate that the application of various scientific concepts and theories in the development of accounting does not always contribute to the solution of accounting problems and tasks. In order to minimize the risks of choosing a false basis for scientific research in the field of accounting, a method for evaluating the effectiveness of the concepts of scientific change has been proposed. The novelty of the proposed approach is that, unlike the existing ones, it allows the mathematical identification of the concept’s adaptability and is based on digital values. Thanks to its use, an informed choice of the most effective concept for researching and solving accounting problems is ensured, which makes it possible to avoid choosing a false basis of scientific research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37115,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intellectual Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intellectual Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13165/ie-20-14-1-07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intellectual Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13165/ie-20-14-1-07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

本研究致力于理论基础的发展和评估现有科学概念对发展会计的适应性的方法的形式化,并基于对科学概念应用于会计研究及其理论发展的优缺点的分析。本文使用实证分析来评估应用特定科学概念的可行性,该概念按照合理的标准形式化。这些标准包括:根据共同特征的存在进行分组;分析了遵循会计原则的概念;通过预测这一概念应用的负面后果,实证评估这一概念对会计方法的影响。研究结果表明,各种科学概念和理论在会计发展中的应用并不总是有助于解决会计问题和任务。为了最大限度地减少在会计领域为科学研究选择虚假依据的风险,提出了一种评估科学变革概念有效性的方法。所提出的方法的新颖性在于,与现有方法不同,它允许对概念的适应性进行数学识别,并基于数字值。由于它的使用,确保了在知情的情况下选择研究和解决会计问题的最有效的概念,从而有可能避免选择虚假的科学研究基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EVALUATION OF THE ADAPTABILITY OF SCIENTIFIC THEORIES FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF ACCOUNTING INSTITUTE
This study is devoted to the development of theoretical foundations and the formalization of the method for assessing the adaptability of existing scientific concepts for the purposes of developing accounting, and is based on an analysis of the advantages and disadvantages of scientific concepts when applied to research on accounting and the development of its theory. The article uses empirical analysis for assessment of the feasibility of applying a specific scientific concept, formalized in accordance with reasonable criteria. These criteria include: grouping based on the presence of common features; analyzing the principles of compliance with the principles of the concept of accounting; and empirical assessment of the impact of the concept on the methodology of accounting through predicting the negative consequences of its application. Research results indicate that the application of various scientific concepts and theories in the development of accounting does not always contribute to the solution of accounting problems and tasks. In order to minimize the risks of choosing a false basis for scientific research in the field of accounting, a method for evaluating the effectiveness of the concepts of scientific change has been proposed. The novelty of the proposed approach is that, unlike the existing ones, it allows the mathematical identification of the concept’s adaptability and is based on digital values. Thanks to its use, an informed choice of the most effective concept for researching and solving accounting problems is ensured, which makes it possible to avoid choosing a false basis of scientific research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intellectual Economics
Intellectual Economics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The impacts of leader-member exchange, psychological capital, and job crafting on innovative behavior: Evidence from the public sector ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OF SERVICE COMPANIES BULGARIAN MUNICIPALITIES: KEY PLAYERS IN THE PROCESS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF EU FUNDS AT THE NATIONAL LEVEL OPTIMIZATION OF THE MENU FOR INSTITUTIONS OF RESTAURANT INDUSTRY BASED ON MATHEMATICAL MODELLING METHODS COMPETITION IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT IN THE FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION: ANALYSIS OF AN EXAMPLE OF UKRAINE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1