情感和行为障碍领域的开放科学

IF 1.7 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Education and Treatment of Children Pub Date : 2019-06-29 DOI:10.35542/osf.io/duvf8
Bryan G. Cook, J. Lloyd, W. Therrien
{"title":"情感和行为障碍领域的开放科学","authors":"Bryan G. Cook, J. Lloyd, W. Therrien","doi":"10.35542/osf.io/duvf8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) present some of the greatest challenges faced by educators, and experience some of the most problematic outcomes. To increase the likelihood that students with EBD will be successful in school and in life, practitioners should implement effective interventions. Trustworthy research is the primary means to identify effective practices. Open science can be used to help verify research findings as trustworthy, as well as improve their accessibility. In this article, we discuss the open science movement and describe five open-science practices (i.e., preregistration, Registered Reports, open data and materials, open access and preprints, and open review) that may help increase the trustworthiness, efficiency, and impact of EBD research. We argue that the implementation of these practices may increase the field's capacity to identify and verify truly effective practices, and facilitate broad accessibility of research for all stakeholders; thereby improving policies and instructional practice for students with EBD.","PeriodicalId":51493,"journal":{"name":"Education and Treatment of Children","volume":"42 1","pages":"579 - 600"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open Science in the Field of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders\",\"authors\":\"Bryan G. Cook, J. Lloyd, W. Therrien\",\"doi\":\"10.35542/osf.io/duvf8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:Students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) present some of the greatest challenges faced by educators, and experience some of the most problematic outcomes. To increase the likelihood that students with EBD will be successful in school and in life, practitioners should implement effective interventions. Trustworthy research is the primary means to identify effective practices. Open science can be used to help verify research findings as trustworthy, as well as improve their accessibility. In this article, we discuss the open science movement and describe five open-science practices (i.e., preregistration, Registered Reports, open data and materials, open access and preprints, and open review) that may help increase the trustworthiness, efficiency, and impact of EBD research. We argue that the implementation of these practices may increase the field's capacity to identify and verify truly effective practices, and facilitate broad accessibility of research for all stakeholders; thereby improving policies and instructional practice for students with EBD.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Education and Treatment of Children\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"579 - 600\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Education and Treatment of Children\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/duvf8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Education and Treatment of Children","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35542/osf.io/duvf8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要:情绪和行为障碍(EBD)学生是教育工作者面临的最大挑战,也是最具问题的结果。为了增加EBD学生在学校和生活中取得成功的可能性,从业者应该实施有效的干预措施。可信的研究是确定有效实践的主要手段。开放科学可以用来帮助验证研究结果是否值得信赖,并提高它们的可访问性。在本文中,我们讨论了开放科学运动,并描述了五种开放科学实践(即,预注册,注册报告,开放数据和材料,开放获取和预印本,以及开放审查),这可能有助于提高EBD研究的可信度,效率和影响。我们认为,这些实践的实施可能会增加该领域识别和验证真正有效实践的能力,并促进所有利益相关者广泛获取研究;从而改善EBD学生的政策和教学实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Open Science in the Field of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders
Abstract:Students with emotional and behavioral disorders (EBD) present some of the greatest challenges faced by educators, and experience some of the most problematic outcomes. To increase the likelihood that students with EBD will be successful in school and in life, practitioners should implement effective interventions. Trustworthy research is the primary means to identify effective practices. Open science can be used to help verify research findings as trustworthy, as well as improve their accessibility. In this article, we discuss the open science movement and describe five open-science practices (i.e., preregistration, Registered Reports, open data and materials, open access and preprints, and open review) that may help increase the trustworthiness, efficiency, and impact of EBD research. We argue that the implementation of these practices may increase the field's capacity to identify and verify truly effective practices, and facilitate broad accessibility of research for all stakeholders; thereby improving policies and instructional practice for students with EBD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Education and Treatment of Children (ETC) is devoted to the dissemination of information concerning the development of services for children and youth who are at risk for or experiencing emotional or behavioral problems. A primary criterion for publication is that the material be of direct value to educators, parents, child care providers, or mental health professionals in improving the effectiveness of their services. Therefore, authors are required to compose their manuscripts in a clear, concise style that will be readily understood by the practitioners who are likely to make use of the information.
期刊最新文献
Mindfulness- and Relationship-Based Interventions: Which Break is Better for Improving Classroom Behavior? Enhancing Ci3T Professional Learning: Initial Lessons Learned from Ci3T Implementers A Systematic Review of Explicit Instruction and Frequency Building Interventions to Teach Students to Write The Daily Report Card and Check-in/Check-out: A Commentary About Two Siloed Interventions Training Behavior Analysts as Strategic Scientists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1