关于“植物营养物质的变异性降低了昆虫食草动物的表现”的评论

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Rethinking Ecology Pub Date : 2019-05-10 DOI:10.3897/RETHINKINGECOLOGY.4.32252
Apostolos‐Manuel Koussoroplis, Toni Klauschies, S. Pincebourde, D. Giron, A. Wacker
{"title":"关于“植物营养物质的变异性降低了昆虫食草动物的表现”的评论","authors":"Apostolos‐Manuel Koussoroplis, Toni Klauschies, S. Pincebourde, D. Giron, A. Wacker","doi":"10.3897/RETHINKINGECOLOGY.4.32252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In their recent contribution, Wetzel et al. [Wetzel et al. (2016) Variability in plant nutrients reduces insect herbivore performance. Nature 539: 425-427] predict that variance in the plant nutrient level reduces herbivore performance via the nonlinear averaging effect (named Jensen’s effect by the authors) while variance in the defense level does not. We argue that the study likely underestimates the potential of plant defenses’ variance to cause Jensen’s effects for two reasons. First, this conclusion is based on the finding that the average Jensen’s effect of various defense traits on various herbivores is zero which does not imply that the Jensen’s effect of specific defense traits on specific herbivores is null, just that the effects balance each other globally. Second, the study neglects the nonlinearity effects that may arise from the synergy between nutritive and defense traits or between co-occurring defenses on herbivore performance. Covariance between interacting plant defense traits, or between plant nutritive and defense traits, can affect performance differently than would nutritive or single plant defense variance alone. Overlooking the interactive effects of plant traits and the traits’ covariance could impair the assessment of the true role of plant trait variability on herbivore populations in natural settings.","PeriodicalId":36503,"journal":{"name":"Rethinking Ecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comment on “Variability in plant nutrients reduces insect herbivore performance”\",\"authors\":\"Apostolos‐Manuel Koussoroplis, Toni Klauschies, S. Pincebourde, D. Giron, A. Wacker\",\"doi\":\"10.3897/RETHINKINGECOLOGY.4.32252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In their recent contribution, Wetzel et al. [Wetzel et al. (2016) Variability in plant nutrients reduces insect herbivore performance. Nature 539: 425-427] predict that variance in the plant nutrient level reduces herbivore performance via the nonlinear averaging effect (named Jensen’s effect by the authors) while variance in the defense level does not. We argue that the study likely underestimates the potential of plant defenses’ variance to cause Jensen’s effects for two reasons. First, this conclusion is based on the finding that the average Jensen’s effect of various defense traits on various herbivores is zero which does not imply that the Jensen’s effect of specific defense traits on specific herbivores is null, just that the effects balance each other globally. Second, the study neglects the nonlinearity effects that may arise from the synergy between nutritive and defense traits or between co-occurring defenses on herbivore performance. Covariance between interacting plant defense traits, or between plant nutritive and defense traits, can affect performance differently than would nutritive or single plant defense variance alone. Overlooking the interactive effects of plant traits and the traits’ covariance could impair the assessment of the true role of plant trait variability on herbivore populations in natural settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Rethinking Ecology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Rethinking Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3897/RETHINKINGECOLOGY.4.32252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rethinking Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/RETHINKINGECOLOGY.4.32252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

Wetzel et al.(2016)植物养分的变化会降低昆虫的食草性表现。[Nature 539: 425-427]预测植物营养水平的变化通过非线性平均效应(作者称之为Jensen效应)降低了食草动物的表现,而防御水平的变化则不会。我们认为,这项研究可能低估了植物防御变异导致詹森效应的潜力,原因有两个。首先,该结论是基于各种防御性状对各种食草动物的平均Jensen效应为零,这并不意味着特定防御性状对特定食草动物的Jensen效应为零,只是在全局上相互平衡。其次,该研究忽略了营养性状和防御性状之间的协同作用或共同发生的防御性状之间对食草动物生产性能的非线性影响。相互作用的植物防御性状之间或植物营养性状与防御性状之间的协方差对生产性能的影响不同于营养性状或单一植物防御性状之间的协方差。忽视植物性状和性状协方差之间的相互作用,可能会影响对植物性状变异在自然环境下对草食动物种群的真正作用的评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comment on “Variability in plant nutrients reduces insect herbivore performance”
In their recent contribution, Wetzel et al. [Wetzel et al. (2016) Variability in plant nutrients reduces insect herbivore performance. Nature 539: 425-427] predict that variance in the plant nutrient level reduces herbivore performance via the nonlinear averaging effect (named Jensen’s effect by the authors) while variance in the defense level does not. We argue that the study likely underestimates the potential of plant defenses’ variance to cause Jensen’s effects for two reasons. First, this conclusion is based on the finding that the average Jensen’s effect of various defense traits on various herbivores is zero which does not imply that the Jensen’s effect of specific defense traits on specific herbivores is null, just that the effects balance each other globally. Second, the study neglects the nonlinearity effects that may arise from the synergy between nutritive and defense traits or between co-occurring defenses on herbivore performance. Covariance between interacting plant defense traits, or between plant nutritive and defense traits, can affect performance differently than would nutritive or single plant defense variance alone. Overlooking the interactive effects of plant traits and the traits’ covariance could impair the assessment of the true role of plant trait variability on herbivore populations in natural settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Rethinking Ecology
Rethinking Ecology Environmental Science-Ecology
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Failure to respond to a coral disease epizootic in Florida: causes and consequences Opportunities to improve the future of South Australia’s terrestrial biodiversity Impact of artificial light at night on the foraging behaviour of the European Hamster: consequences for the introduction of this species in suburban areas Poor implementation of non-invasive sampling in wildlife genetics studies Hypothesizing novel mating behaviours in the squaretail grouper based on direct behavioural observations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1