批评性报道:媒体如何批评最高法院——来自以色列的证据

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q1 LAW Law & Policy Pub Date : 2021-01-21 DOI:10.1111/lapo.12160
Bryna Bogoch, Yifat Holzman-Gazit
{"title":"批评性报道:媒体如何批评最高法院——来自以色列的证据","authors":"Bryna Bogoch,&nbsp;Yifat Holzman-Gazit","doi":"10.1111/lapo.12160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper examines media criticism of the Israeli Supreme Court from 2002 to 2011 in two newspapers. We analyze the nature and patterns of press criticism in different contexts by 1) distinguishing between diffuse and specific criticism and 2) by analyzing criticism separately from political framing and the tone of the article. We find that the increase in diffuse criticism and political framing over time was often balanced with counter-criticism, resulting in a neutral or even positive tone toward the Court. This complex picture enables a more sophisticated understanding of the nature and implications of criticism of supreme courts in the press.</p>","PeriodicalId":47050,"journal":{"name":"Law & Policy","volume":"43 1","pages":"51-72"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/lapo.12160","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical coverage: How the media criticize supreme courts—Evidence from Israel\",\"authors\":\"Bryna Bogoch,&nbsp;Yifat Holzman-Gazit\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/lapo.12160\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This paper examines media criticism of the Israeli Supreme Court from 2002 to 2011 in two newspapers. We analyze the nature and patterns of press criticism in different contexts by 1) distinguishing between diffuse and specific criticism and 2) by analyzing criticism separately from political framing and the tone of the article. We find that the increase in diffuse criticism and political framing over time was often balanced with counter-criticism, resulting in a neutral or even positive tone toward the Court. This complex picture enables a more sophisticated understanding of the nature and implications of criticism of supreme courts in the press.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47050,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Law & Policy\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"51-72\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/lapo.12160\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Law & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lapo.12160\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lapo.12160","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了2002年至2011年两家报纸对以色列最高法院的媒体批评。我们分析了不同背景下新闻批评的性质和模式:1)区分漫射批评和具体批评;2)将批评与政治框架和文章基调分开分析。我们发现,随着时间的推移,扩散批评和政治框架的增加往往与反批评相平衡,导致对法院的中立甚至积极的语气。这种复杂的情况使我们对新闻界对最高法院的批评的性质和影响有了更复杂的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Critical coverage: How the media criticize supreme courts—Evidence from Israel

This paper examines media criticism of the Israeli Supreme Court from 2002 to 2011 in two newspapers. We analyze the nature and patterns of press criticism in different contexts by 1) distinguishing between diffuse and specific criticism and 2) by analyzing criticism separately from political framing and the tone of the article. We find that the increase in diffuse criticism and political framing over time was often balanced with counter-criticism, resulting in a neutral or even positive tone toward the Court. This complex picture enables a more sophisticated understanding of the nature and implications of criticism of supreme courts in the press.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
15.40%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: International and interdisciplinary in scope, Law & Policy embraces varied research methodologies that interrogate law, governance, and public policy worldwide. Law & Policy makes a vital contribution to the current dialogue on contemporary policy by publishing innovative, peer-reviewed articles on such critical topics as • government and self-regulation • health • environment • family • gender • taxation and finance • legal decision-making • criminal justice • human rights
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Does racial impact statement reform reduce Black–White disparities in imprisonment: Mixed methods evidence from Minnesota Stewards, defenders, progenitors, and collaborators: Courts in the age of democratic decline Judicial transformation in a competitive authoritarian regime: Evidence from the Turkish case Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1