g的小帮手——VOTAT和NOTAT调解了智力和解决复杂问题之间的关系

IF 3.3 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Intelligence Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.intell.2022.101685
Christin Lotz , Ronny Scherer , Samuel Greiff , Jörn R. Sparfeldt
{"title":"g的小帮手——VOTAT和NOTAT调解了智力和解决复杂问题之间的关系","authors":"Christin Lotz ,&nbsp;Ronny Scherer ,&nbsp;Samuel Greiff ,&nbsp;Jörn R. Sparfeldt","doi":"10.1016/j.intell.2022.101685","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Intelligence and complex problem solving (CPS) correlate closely, but little is known about the mechanism that translates intelligence into successful CPS. Therefore, this study considered the strategic exploration behaviors VOTAT (vary-one-thing-at-a-time) and NOTAT (vary no-thing-at-a-time) as possible mediators. A sample of 495 high-school students worked on nine CPS tasks, six of which with solely direct effects and three with direct and eigendynamic effects. We expected substantial mediation effects if the applied strategic behaviors were optimal to identify the particular underlying effect types (i.e., direct effects: VOTAT; direct and eigendynamic effects: VOTAT and NOTAT). The model for tasks with only direct effects revealed VOTAT and NOTAT to be substantial mediators: Whereas VOTAT showed substantial positive relations to intelligence and CPS performance, NOTAT unexpectedly showed substantial negative relations. Both VOTAT and NOTAT resulted in significant indirect mediation effects. The model for tasks with direct and eigendynamic effects showed substantial positive relations of VOTAT and NOTAT to intelligence and CPS-performance and resulted in significant and positive indirect mediation effects. Moreover, the indirect effects differed between VOTAT and NOTAT and across the two facets of CPS performance. Overall, strategic exploration behaviors are relevant for explaining the <em>g</em>-CPS-relation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13862,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence","volume":"95 ","pages":"Article 101685"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"g's little helpers – VOTAT and NOTAT mediate the relation between intelligence and complex problem solving\",\"authors\":\"Christin Lotz ,&nbsp;Ronny Scherer ,&nbsp;Samuel Greiff ,&nbsp;Jörn R. Sparfeldt\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.intell.2022.101685\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Intelligence and complex problem solving (CPS) correlate closely, but little is known about the mechanism that translates intelligence into successful CPS. Therefore, this study considered the strategic exploration behaviors VOTAT (vary-one-thing-at-a-time) and NOTAT (vary no-thing-at-a-time) as possible mediators. A sample of 495 high-school students worked on nine CPS tasks, six of which with solely direct effects and three with direct and eigendynamic effects. We expected substantial mediation effects if the applied strategic behaviors were optimal to identify the particular underlying effect types (i.e., direct effects: VOTAT; direct and eigendynamic effects: VOTAT and NOTAT). The model for tasks with only direct effects revealed VOTAT and NOTAT to be substantial mediators: Whereas VOTAT showed substantial positive relations to intelligence and CPS performance, NOTAT unexpectedly showed substantial negative relations. Both VOTAT and NOTAT resulted in significant indirect mediation effects. The model for tasks with direct and eigendynamic effects showed substantial positive relations of VOTAT and NOTAT to intelligence and CPS-performance and resulted in significant and positive indirect mediation effects. Moreover, the indirect effects differed between VOTAT and NOTAT and across the two facets of CPS performance. Overall, strategic exploration behaviors are relevant for explaining the <em>g</em>-CPS-relation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intelligence\",\"volume\":\"95 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101685\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intelligence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289622000666\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0160289622000666","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

智力与复杂问题解决能力(CPS)密切相关,但人们对将智力转化为成功的CPS的机制知之甚少。因此,本研究认为战略探索行为VOTAT (change -one-thing-at- time)和NOTAT (vary no-thing-at- time)可能是中介。495名高中生完成了9项CPS任务,其中6项只有直接效应,3项有直接效应和特征动力效应。如果应用的战略行为是最优的,我们预计会有实质性的中介效应,以确定特定的潜在效应类型(即直接效应:VOTAT;直接和本征动力效应:VOTAT和NOTAT)。只有直接影响的任务模型显示,VOTAT和NOTAT是实质性的中介:尽管VOTAT对智力和CPS表现表现出实质性的正相关,但NOTAT出人意料地表现出实质性的负相关。VOTAT和NOTAT均产生了显著的间接中介效应。在具有直接效应和特征动力效应的任务模型中,VOTAT和NOTAT对智力和cps绩效存在显著的正相关关系,并产生显著的正间接中介效应。此外,间接影响在VOTAT和NOTAT之间以及在CPS绩效的两个方面有所不同。总体而言,战略探索行为与解释g- cps关系相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
g's little helpers – VOTAT and NOTAT mediate the relation between intelligence and complex problem solving

Intelligence and complex problem solving (CPS) correlate closely, but little is known about the mechanism that translates intelligence into successful CPS. Therefore, this study considered the strategic exploration behaviors VOTAT (vary-one-thing-at-a-time) and NOTAT (vary no-thing-at-a-time) as possible mediators. A sample of 495 high-school students worked on nine CPS tasks, six of which with solely direct effects and three with direct and eigendynamic effects. We expected substantial mediation effects if the applied strategic behaviors were optimal to identify the particular underlying effect types (i.e., direct effects: VOTAT; direct and eigendynamic effects: VOTAT and NOTAT). The model for tasks with only direct effects revealed VOTAT and NOTAT to be substantial mediators: Whereas VOTAT showed substantial positive relations to intelligence and CPS performance, NOTAT unexpectedly showed substantial negative relations. Both VOTAT and NOTAT resulted in significant indirect mediation effects. The model for tasks with direct and eigendynamic effects showed substantial positive relations of VOTAT and NOTAT to intelligence and CPS-performance and resulted in significant and positive indirect mediation effects. Moreover, the indirect effects differed between VOTAT and NOTAT and across the two facets of CPS performance. Overall, strategic exploration behaviors are relevant for explaining the g-CPS-relation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intelligence
Intelligence PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
64
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: This unique journal in psychology is devoted to publishing original research and theoretical studies and review papers that substantially contribute to the understanding of intelligence. It provides a new source of significant papers in psychometrics, tests and measurement, and all other empirical and theoretical studies in intelligence and mental retardation.
期刊最新文献
Reconsidering the search for alternatives to general mental ability tests Putting the Flynn effect under the microscope: Item-level patterns in NLSYC PIAT-math scores, 1986–2004 Editorial Board The AI attribution gap: Encouraging transparent acknowledgment in the age of AI Does test preparation mediate the effect of parents' level of educational attainment on medical school admission test performance?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1