金融危机后中介机构在信托重建中的作用以及对“计算信托”存在的鼓励意义

IF 1.9 Q3 MANAGEMENT Journal of Trust Research Pub Date : 2018-01-02 DOI:10.1080/21515581.2018.1476870
Petra Ritzer-Angerer
{"title":"金融危机后中介机构在信托重建中的作用以及对“计算信托”存在的鼓励意义","authors":"Petra Ritzer-Angerer","doi":"10.1080/21515581.2018.1476870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The collapse of Lehman Brothers seriously damaged trust in financial institutions and markets: The financial markets’ crisis became a trust crisis, with its decline affecting general confidence in banks, bankers and financial markets. Accordingly, it has become necessary to undertake research into the investment decision, looking specifically at trust and how it can be rebuilt. There is strong evidence for trust's importance in investment decisions and the investment advisory industry generally, with banks’ advice to investors playing an important role within the overall decision-making process. When investment decisions ultimately turn out to be wrong, trust in advisors clearly becomes seriously damaged. This article explains why trust in financial markets is closely connected with trust in intermediaries: The model of intermediaries in trust developed by James S. Coleman is transferred to bankers offering their customers investment advice, confirming the requirement for trust in investment. Further insights concern the question of why trust is damaged when investment decisions turn out badly and in overcoming the financial crisis, why intermediaries are crucial components in the trust repair process. Ultimately, a financial crisis which becomes a serious trust crisis implies that, contrary to assumptions in standard neoclassical models, the irrelevance of trust can no longer be defended. Furthermore, this means that ‘calculative trust’ does actually exist.","PeriodicalId":44602,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trust Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21515581.2018.1476870","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of intermediaries within trust rebuilding after financial crisis and encouraging implications for the existence of ‘calculative trust’\",\"authors\":\"Petra Ritzer-Angerer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21515581.2018.1476870\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The collapse of Lehman Brothers seriously damaged trust in financial institutions and markets: The financial markets’ crisis became a trust crisis, with its decline affecting general confidence in banks, bankers and financial markets. Accordingly, it has become necessary to undertake research into the investment decision, looking specifically at trust and how it can be rebuilt. There is strong evidence for trust's importance in investment decisions and the investment advisory industry generally, with banks’ advice to investors playing an important role within the overall decision-making process. When investment decisions ultimately turn out to be wrong, trust in advisors clearly becomes seriously damaged. This article explains why trust in financial markets is closely connected with trust in intermediaries: The model of intermediaries in trust developed by James S. Coleman is transferred to bankers offering their customers investment advice, confirming the requirement for trust in investment. Further insights concern the question of why trust is damaged when investment decisions turn out badly and in overcoming the financial crisis, why intermediaries are crucial components in the trust repair process. Ultimately, a financial crisis which becomes a serious trust crisis implies that, contrary to assumptions in standard neoclassical models, the irrelevance of trust can no longer be defended. Furthermore, this means that ‘calculative trust’ does actually exist.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44602,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Trust Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21515581.2018.1476870\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Trust Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2018.1476870\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trust Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2018.1476870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

雷曼兄弟的倒闭严重损害了人们对金融机构和市场的信任:金融市场危机演变为信任危机,信任危机的下降影响了人们对银行、银行家和金融市场的普遍信心。因此,有必要对投资决策进行研究,具体着眼于信任以及如何重建信任。有强有力的证据表明信托在投资决策和投资咨询行业的重要性,银行对投资者的建议在整个决策过程中发挥着重要作用。当投资决策最终被证明是错误的时候,对顾问的信任显然会受到严重损害。本文解释了为什么金融市场的信任与中介机构的信任密切相关:James S. Coleman发展的信托中介机构模型被转移到银行家向客户提供投资建议的过程中,确认了投资信任的要求。进一步的见解涉及以下问题:为什么当投资决策结果不佳时,信任会受到损害;在克服金融危机的过程中,为什么中介机构是信任修复过程中的关键组成部分。最终,一场演变为严重信任危机的金融危机意味着,与标准新古典主义模型的假设相反,信任的无关性无法再得到辩护。此外,这意味着“计算信任”确实存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The role of intermediaries within trust rebuilding after financial crisis and encouraging implications for the existence of ‘calculative trust’
The collapse of Lehman Brothers seriously damaged trust in financial institutions and markets: The financial markets’ crisis became a trust crisis, with its decline affecting general confidence in banks, bankers and financial markets. Accordingly, it has become necessary to undertake research into the investment decision, looking specifically at trust and how it can be rebuilt. There is strong evidence for trust's importance in investment decisions and the investment advisory industry generally, with banks’ advice to investors playing an important role within the overall decision-making process. When investment decisions ultimately turn out to be wrong, trust in advisors clearly becomes seriously damaged. This article explains why trust in financial markets is closely connected with trust in intermediaries: The model of intermediaries in trust developed by James S. Coleman is transferred to bankers offering their customers investment advice, confirming the requirement for trust in investment. Further insights concern the question of why trust is damaged when investment decisions turn out badly and in overcoming the financial crisis, why intermediaries are crucial components in the trust repair process. Ultimately, a financial crisis which becomes a serious trust crisis implies that, contrary to assumptions in standard neoclassical models, the irrelevance of trust can no longer be defended. Furthermore, this means that ‘calculative trust’ does actually exist.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
42.90%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: As an inter-disciplinary and cross-cultural journal dedicated to advancing a cross-level, context-rich, process-oriented, and practice-relevant journal, JTR provides a focal point for an open dialogue and debate between diverse researchers, thus enhancing the understanding of trust in general and trust-related management in particular, especially in its organizational and social context in the broadest sense. Through both theoretical development and empirical investigation, JTR seeks to open the "black-box" of trust in various contexts.
期刊最新文献
Social trust during the pandemic: Longitudinal evidence from three waves of the Swiss household panel study Integrating focal vulnerability into trust research Capturing the conversation of trust research On the intricate relationship between data and theory, and the potential gain afforded by capturing very low levels of media trust: Commentary on Mangold (2024) Is security still the chiefest enemy? The challenges and contradictions in European confidence- and security-building in the Cold War
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1