{"title":"写睫毛膏:对葡萄牙在《古兰经》中的正字法的思考","authors":"Maiune de Oliveira Silva","doi":"10.5216/lep.v23i1.63871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article presents data and analysis about writing in Goiás's ecclesiastical documents, written in the nineteenth century. For this purpose, the material of our study is a manuscript codex between the years 1839-1842, with baptismal certificates of slaves and their progeny and of free people. We observe that ortographic occurrences such as borders of words that represent words phonological and/or morphological, the position of the diacritical mark or the lack of it promotes the formation of diphthongs and monophthongs or represents the form they would occur in speech. As theoretical sources, we will use Higounet (2003); Megale et al. (2007), Fachin (2011 ), and others that talk about this issue.","PeriodicalId":40597,"journal":{"name":"Linguagem-Estudos e Pesquisas","volume":"23 1","pages":"111-131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ESCRITA QUE (DES)MASCARA: CONSIDERAÇÕES SOBRE ORTOGRAFIA PORTUGUESA OITOCENTISTA EM MANUSCRITOS GOIANOS\",\"authors\":\"Maiune de Oliveira Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.5216/lep.v23i1.63871\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article presents data and analysis about writing in Goiás's ecclesiastical documents, written in the nineteenth century. For this purpose, the material of our study is a manuscript codex between the years 1839-1842, with baptismal certificates of slaves and their progeny and of free people. We observe that ortographic occurrences such as borders of words that represent words phonological and/or morphological, the position of the diacritical mark or the lack of it promotes the formation of diphthongs and monophthongs or represents the form they would occur in speech. As theoretical sources, we will use Higounet (2003); Megale et al. (2007), Fachin (2011 ), and others that talk about this issue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguagem-Estudos e Pesquisas\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"111-131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguagem-Estudos e Pesquisas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5216/lep.v23i1.63871\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguagem-Estudos e Pesquisas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5216/lep.v23i1.63871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
这篇文章提供了数据和分析,关于写作在Goiás的教会文件,写在十九世纪。为此,我们研究的材料是1839年至1842年间的手抄本,上面有奴隶及其后代和自由人的洗礼证书。我们观察到,词形上的出现,如代表单词语音和/或形态学的单词的边界,变音标记的位置或缺少变音标记,促进双元音和单元音的形成,或代表它们在讲话中出现的形式。作为理论来源,我们将使用Higounet (2003);Megale et al. (2007), Fachin(2011),以及其他讨论这个问题的人。
ESCRITA QUE (DES)MASCARA: CONSIDERAÇÕES SOBRE ORTOGRAFIA PORTUGUESA OITOCENTISTA EM MANUSCRITOS GOIANOS
This article presents data and analysis about writing in Goiás's ecclesiastical documents, written in the nineteenth century. For this purpose, the material of our study is a manuscript codex between the years 1839-1842, with baptismal certificates of slaves and their progeny and of free people. We observe that ortographic occurrences such as borders of words that represent words phonological and/or morphological, the position of the diacritical mark or the lack of it promotes the formation of diphthongs and monophthongs or represents the form they would occur in speech. As theoretical sources, we will use Higounet (2003); Megale et al. (2007), Fachin (2011 ), and others that talk about this issue.