根据可持续发展目标绘制和评估印度最高法院关于可持续发展的判例:从Vellore公民福利论坛到Hanuman Laxman Aroskar

IF 0.3 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law Pub Date : 2023-05-12 DOI:10.4337/apjel.2022.02.04
Florian Müller
{"title":"根据可持续发展目标绘制和评估印度最高法院关于可持续发展的判例:从Vellore公民福利论坛到Hanuman Laxman Aroskar","authors":"Florian Müller","doi":"10.4337/apjel.2022.02.04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2015 adoption of Agenda 2030 with its 17 Sustainable Development Goals represents a new approach to promoting sustainable development. This article examines the potential openness of the Supreme Court of India to utilize Agenda 2030 rhetoric by looking at the Court’s case law. For this purpose, landmark cases that advanced the Court’s understanding of sustainable development are analyzed in order to identify different angles of interpretation. Against this background, this article argues that the Court’s 2019 ruling in Hanuman Laxman Aroskar v Union of India marks a critical step towards SDG implementation in a domestic context. In light of this recent development, the Court’s jurisprudence on sustainable development is then critically evaluated. The article concludes with an outlook on potential future paths of integrating the SDGs into the Court’s case law.","PeriodicalId":41125,"journal":{"name":"Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mapping and assessing the Supreme Court of India’s jurisprudence on sustainable development in light of the SDGs: from Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum to Hanuman Laxman Aroskar\",\"authors\":\"Florian Müller\",\"doi\":\"10.4337/apjel.2022.02.04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The 2015 adoption of Agenda 2030 with its 17 Sustainable Development Goals represents a new approach to promoting sustainable development. This article examines the potential openness of the Supreme Court of India to utilize Agenda 2030 rhetoric by looking at the Court’s case law. For this purpose, landmark cases that advanced the Court’s understanding of sustainable development are analyzed in order to identify different angles of interpretation. Against this background, this article argues that the Court’s 2019 ruling in Hanuman Laxman Aroskar v Union of India marks a critical step towards SDG implementation in a domestic context. In light of this recent development, the Court’s jurisprudence on sustainable development is then critically evaluated. The article concludes with an outlook on potential future paths of integrating the SDGs into the Court’s case law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41125,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4337/apjel.2022.02.04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4337/apjel.2022.02.04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2015年通过的《2030年议程》包含17个可持续发展目标,为促进可持续发展提出了新思路。本文通过观察法院的判例法,探讨了印度最高法院在利用2030年议程修辞方面的潜在开放性。为此,本文分析了促进法院对可持续发展理解的具有里程碑意义的案例,以确定不同的解释角度。在此背景下,本文认为,法院2019年在Hanuman Laxman Aroskar诉印度联邦案中作出的裁决标志着在国内背景下实现可持续发展目标的关键一步。鉴于这一最近的发展,法院在可持续发展方面的判例将受到严格的评价。文章最后展望了将可持续发展目标纳入法院判例法的潜在未来路径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mapping and assessing the Supreme Court of India’s jurisprudence on sustainable development in light of the SDGs: from Vellore Citizens Welfare Forum to Hanuman Laxman Aroskar
The 2015 adoption of Agenda 2030 with its 17 Sustainable Development Goals represents a new approach to promoting sustainable development. This article examines the potential openness of the Supreme Court of India to utilize Agenda 2030 rhetoric by looking at the Court’s case law. For this purpose, landmark cases that advanced the Court’s understanding of sustainable development are analyzed in order to identify different angles of interpretation. Against this background, this article argues that the Court’s 2019 ruling in Hanuman Laxman Aroskar v Union of India marks a critical step towards SDG implementation in a domestic context. In light of this recent development, the Court’s jurisprudence on sustainable development is then critically evaluated. The article concludes with an outlook on potential future paths of integrating the SDGs into the Court’s case law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law (APJEL) is published in two issues each year by the Australian Centre for Climate and Environmental Law (ACCEL). To subscribe please complete the Subscription form and return to ACCEL.
期刊最新文献
Protection of internally displaced people in South Asia: the role the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) could play in implementing a convention similar to the Kampala Convention Achieving corporate environmental responsibility through emerging sustainability laws Environmental activism by the Philippine Supreme Court: initiatives and impediments Taking stock of REDD+: a consideration of the experiences of Fiji and Ghana Mainstreaming gender in transboundary water governance: a South Asian perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1