有意义的群体文化:使用多层次评估的多维测量的发展

Seerat Fatima, M. Hassan
{"title":"有意义的群体文化:使用多层次评估的多维测量的发展","authors":"Seerat Fatima, M. Hassan","doi":"10.1108/jamr-07-2022-0150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThere is a growing array of literature that supports various implications of positive organizational psychology on workplace outcomes such as the positive work cultures. However, lack of appropriate measuring instruments is halting the progress in this field. Laid down in this article are the conceptual and empirical perspective regarding a positive group culture, i.e. meaningful group culture (MGC) and elaboration of what MGC is and how to measure it. For this study, the MGC is defined as a culture of humane orientation and explained through five dimensions: ideology infused, caring for employees, pro diversity, helping and employee-centric organization identification. The purpose of this paper is to address this issue.Design/methodology/approachTo further elucidate, development and validation of the MGC instrument was carried out in three phases. In the very first phase, content and face validity was assessed by experts. Following it, the second phase construct validity was undertaken through exploratory factor analysis of the results from the use of the instrument on a sample of 540 professionals. To end with, in the third phase, multilevel confirmatory analysis was conducted on an organizational sample of 397 individuals and 106 groups.FindingsThe results of the Multilevel Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MCFA) provided further evidence of confirmation that the extraction of five factors was appropriate, and reliability analysis showed the MGC to be both valid and reliable. Consequently, the applications of the tool to Human Resource Development (HRD) professionals are suggested.Research limitations/implicationsTo broaden the coverage and enhance generalizability, the study focused on multi-sector convenient based sample.Practical implicationsHRD professionals can use it as a diagnostic tool for deeper exploration into systematic and organizational issues. The use of it can provide a window for addressing the developmental needs within the organizations.Originality/valueThis study is possibly one of the first to develop a psychometrically valid scale to measure higher order measure of a work group culture through multilevel assessment of the model.","PeriodicalId":46158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advances in Management Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meaningful group culture: development of a multidimensional measure using multilevel assessment\",\"authors\":\"Seerat Fatima, M. Hassan\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jamr-07-2022-0150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThere is a growing array of literature that supports various implications of positive organizational psychology on workplace outcomes such as the positive work cultures. However, lack of appropriate measuring instruments is halting the progress in this field. Laid down in this article are the conceptual and empirical perspective regarding a positive group culture, i.e. meaningful group culture (MGC) and elaboration of what MGC is and how to measure it. For this study, the MGC is defined as a culture of humane orientation and explained through five dimensions: ideology infused, caring for employees, pro diversity, helping and employee-centric organization identification. The purpose of this paper is to address this issue.Design/methodology/approachTo further elucidate, development and validation of the MGC instrument was carried out in three phases. In the very first phase, content and face validity was assessed by experts. Following it, the second phase construct validity was undertaken through exploratory factor analysis of the results from the use of the instrument on a sample of 540 professionals. To end with, in the third phase, multilevel confirmatory analysis was conducted on an organizational sample of 397 individuals and 106 groups.FindingsThe results of the Multilevel Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MCFA) provided further evidence of confirmation that the extraction of five factors was appropriate, and reliability analysis showed the MGC to be both valid and reliable. Consequently, the applications of the tool to Human Resource Development (HRD) professionals are suggested.Research limitations/implicationsTo broaden the coverage and enhance generalizability, the study focused on multi-sector convenient based sample.Practical implicationsHRD professionals can use it as a diagnostic tool for deeper exploration into systematic and organizational issues. The use of it can provide a window for addressing the developmental needs within the organizations.Originality/valueThis study is possibly one of the first to develop a psychometrically valid scale to measure higher order measure of a work group culture through multilevel assessment of the model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Advances in Management Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Advances in Management Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jamr-07-2022-0150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advances in Management Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jamr-07-2022-0150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的文献支持积极组织心理学对工作场所结果(如积极的工作文化)的各种影响。然而,由于缺乏适当的测量工具,这一领域的进展受到阻碍。本文从概念和实证的角度阐述了积极的群体文化,即有意义的群体文化(MGC),并阐述了MGC是什么以及如何衡量它。本研究将MGC定义为一种以人为本的文化,并从意识形态注入、关心员工、支持多样性、帮助和以员工为中心的组织认同五个维度进行解释。本文的目的就是要解决这个问题。为了进一步阐明,MGC仪器的开发和验证分三个阶段进行。在第一阶段,由专家评估内容效度和面部效度。随后,通过对540名专业人员使用该工具的结果进行探索性因子分析,进行了第二阶段的结构效度。最后,在第三阶段,对397名个人和106个群体的组织样本进行了多层次验证性分析。结果:多层验证性因子分析(MCFA)的结果进一步证实了五个因子的提取是合适的,信度分析表明MGC是有效和可靠的。因此,建议将该工具应用于人力资源开发(HRD)专业人员。研究局限/启示为了扩大研究范围,提高研究的普遍性,本研究主要采用基于多部门的便捷样本。shrd专业人员可以将其作为一种诊断工具,对系统和组织问题进行更深入的探索。它的使用可以为解决组织内部的发展需求提供一个窗口。原创性/价值本研究可能是第一个开发出一种心理测量学上有效的量表,通过对模型的多层次评估来测量团队文化的高阶测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Meaningful group culture: development of a multidimensional measure using multilevel assessment
PurposeThere is a growing array of literature that supports various implications of positive organizational psychology on workplace outcomes such as the positive work cultures. However, lack of appropriate measuring instruments is halting the progress in this field. Laid down in this article are the conceptual and empirical perspective regarding a positive group culture, i.e. meaningful group culture (MGC) and elaboration of what MGC is and how to measure it. For this study, the MGC is defined as a culture of humane orientation and explained through five dimensions: ideology infused, caring for employees, pro diversity, helping and employee-centric organization identification. The purpose of this paper is to address this issue.Design/methodology/approachTo further elucidate, development and validation of the MGC instrument was carried out in three phases. In the very first phase, content and face validity was assessed by experts. Following it, the second phase construct validity was undertaken through exploratory factor analysis of the results from the use of the instrument on a sample of 540 professionals. To end with, in the third phase, multilevel confirmatory analysis was conducted on an organizational sample of 397 individuals and 106 groups.FindingsThe results of the Multilevel Confirmatory Factor Analysis (MCFA) provided further evidence of confirmation that the extraction of five factors was appropriate, and reliability analysis showed the MGC to be both valid and reliable. Consequently, the applications of the tool to Human Resource Development (HRD) professionals are suggested.Research limitations/implicationsTo broaden the coverage and enhance generalizability, the study focused on multi-sector convenient based sample.Practical implicationsHRD professionals can use it as a diagnostic tool for deeper exploration into systematic and organizational issues. The use of it can provide a window for addressing the developmental needs within the organizations.Originality/valueThis study is possibly one of the first to develop a psychometrically valid scale to measure higher order measure of a work group culture through multilevel assessment of the model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
The type of supplier involvement in new product development in the automotive industry: metaheuristic-based K-means clustering and analytic hierarchical process methods Resilience of developing economies to external shocks: empirical evidence from CEMAC countries Unbraiding the effect of policy benefits on subjective well-being: the mediating role of work-related well-being Development and psychometric validation of a scale for sources of resistance to change in higher education institutions Assessment of bus fleet service quality: a graph theoretical approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1