多元民主中的官僚主义研究

Alexander Bolton, Sharece Thrower
{"title":"多元民主中的官僚主义研究","authors":"Alexander Bolton, Sharece Thrower","doi":"10.1080/07343469.2022.2139020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The federal bureaucracy is well-studied, with developed research agendas on topics related to its policy decisions, performance, and interactions with the broader political system. Yet issues of diversity, equity, and inclusiveness remain relatively understudied by political scientists in this area. In this essay, we provide a blueprint for incorporating these topics into the study of the bureaucracy in political science. We first review the current state of the literature, highlighting two key issues: (1) capacity and performance and (2) political influence. In doing so, we discuss how exploring issues of diversity and equity might shed light on several unresolved questions in these areas and open potential avenues for future research. Overall, we believe that engaging with varied dimensions of diversity is fundamental for enriching the literature on the administrative state and for understanding the efficacy of our democracy in advancing the interests of marginalized groups.","PeriodicalId":41473,"journal":{"name":"Congress & The Presidency-A Journal of Capital Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Studying Bureaucracy in a Diverse Democracy\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Bolton, Sharece Thrower\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07343469.2022.2139020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The federal bureaucracy is well-studied, with developed research agendas on topics related to its policy decisions, performance, and interactions with the broader political system. Yet issues of diversity, equity, and inclusiveness remain relatively understudied by political scientists in this area. In this essay, we provide a blueprint for incorporating these topics into the study of the bureaucracy in political science. We first review the current state of the literature, highlighting two key issues: (1) capacity and performance and (2) political influence. In doing so, we discuss how exploring issues of diversity and equity might shed light on several unresolved questions in these areas and open potential avenues for future research. Overall, we believe that engaging with varied dimensions of diversity is fundamental for enriching the literature on the administrative state and for understanding the efficacy of our democracy in advancing the interests of marginalized groups.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41473,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Congress & The Presidency-A Journal of Capital Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Congress & The Presidency-A Journal of Capital Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07343469.2022.2139020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Congress & The Presidency-A Journal of Capital Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07343469.2022.2139020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要对联邦官僚机构进行了深入研究,制定了与其政策决策、绩效以及与更广泛的政治体系互动相关的研究议程。然而,这一领域的政治科学家对多样性、公平性和包容性问题的研究相对不足。在这篇文章中,我们为将这些主题纳入政治学中的官僚主义研究提供了一个蓝图。我们首先回顾了文献的现状,强调了两个关键问题:(1)能力和表现;(2)政治影响力。在这样做的过程中,我们讨论了探索多样性和公平问题如何揭示这些领域中几个尚未解决的问题,并为未来的研究开辟潜在的途径。总的来说,我们认为,参与多样性的各个层面对于丰富关于行政国家的文献和理解我们的民主在促进边缘化群体利益方面的效力至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Studying Bureaucracy in a Diverse Democracy
Abstract The federal bureaucracy is well-studied, with developed research agendas on topics related to its policy decisions, performance, and interactions with the broader political system. Yet issues of diversity, equity, and inclusiveness remain relatively understudied by political scientists in this area. In this essay, we provide a blueprint for incorporating these topics into the study of the bureaucracy in political science. We first review the current state of the literature, highlighting two key issues: (1) capacity and performance and (2) political influence. In doing so, we discuss how exploring issues of diversity and equity might shed light on several unresolved questions in these areas and open potential avenues for future research. Overall, we believe that engaging with varied dimensions of diversity is fundamental for enriching the literature on the administrative state and for understanding the efficacy of our democracy in advancing the interests of marginalized groups.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Wallach, Philip A. Why Congress Wallach, Philip A. Why Congress . New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2023. 336 pages. $29.95 (hardcover). Peake, Jeffrey S. Dysfunctional Diplomacy: The Politics of International Agreements in an Era of Partisan Polarization Bird, R. Kenton, and John C. Pierce. Tom Foley: The Man in the MiddleBird, R. Kenton, and John C. Pierce. Tom Foley: The Man in the Middle . Lawrence, KS: University Press of Kansas, 2023. 256 pages. $32.95 (hardcover). Kornberg, Maya L. Inside Congressional Committees: Function and Dysfunction in the Legislative Process Herrnson, Paul S., Colton C. Campbell, and David A. Dulio, Eds. Under the Iron Dome: Congress from the Inside
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1