新兴技术是否有助于打赢反腐败斗争?对证据状况的回顾

IF 4.5 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Information Economics and Policy Pub Date : 2021-12-01 DOI:10.1016/j.infoecopol.2021.100950
Isabelle Adam , Mihály Fazekas
{"title":"新兴技术是否有助于打赢反腐败斗争?对证据状况的回顾","authors":"Isabelle Adam ,&nbsp;Mihály Fazekas","doi":"10.1016/j.infoecopol.2021.100950","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Information and Communication Technology (ICT) is often thought of as a uniformly positive tool making governments more transparent, accountable, and less corrupt. However, the evidence on it is mixed and often misunderstood. Hence, this article carries out a systematic stocktaking of ICT tools’ impact on corruption, offering a nuanced and context-dependent assessment. The tools reviewed are digital public services, crowdsourcing platforms, whistleblowing tools, transparency portals, distributed ledger technology, and artificial intelligence. We scrutinise the evidence both on ICTs’ anticorruption effectiveness and misuse for corruption. Drawing on the commonalities across technologies, we find that ICT can support anti-corruption by impacting public scrutiny in numerous ways: enabling reporting on corruption, promoting transparency and accountability, facilitating citizen participation and government-citizen interactions. However, ICT can also provide new corruption opportunities through the dark web, cryptocurrencies, or the misuse of technologies such as centralised databases. The introduction of ICT tools does not automatically translate into anti-corruption outcomes; rather, impact hinges on the matching between ICT tools and the local context, including support for and skills in using technology.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47029,"journal":{"name":"Information Economics and Policy","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 100950"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016762452100038X/pdfft?md5=4e6723507cceccb492daf783d2f10171&pid=1-s2.0-S016762452100038X-main.pdf","citationCount":"47","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are emerging technologies helping win the fight against corruption? A review of the state of evidence\",\"authors\":\"Isabelle Adam ,&nbsp;Mihály Fazekas\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.infoecopol.2021.100950\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Information and Communication Technology (ICT) is often thought of as a uniformly positive tool making governments more transparent, accountable, and less corrupt. However, the evidence on it is mixed and often misunderstood. Hence, this article carries out a systematic stocktaking of ICT tools’ impact on corruption, offering a nuanced and context-dependent assessment. The tools reviewed are digital public services, crowdsourcing platforms, whistleblowing tools, transparency portals, distributed ledger technology, and artificial intelligence. We scrutinise the evidence both on ICTs’ anticorruption effectiveness and misuse for corruption. Drawing on the commonalities across technologies, we find that ICT can support anti-corruption by impacting public scrutiny in numerous ways: enabling reporting on corruption, promoting transparency and accountability, facilitating citizen participation and government-citizen interactions. However, ICT can also provide new corruption opportunities through the dark web, cryptocurrencies, or the misuse of technologies such as centralised databases. The introduction of ICT tools does not automatically translate into anti-corruption outcomes; rather, impact hinges on the matching between ICT tools and the local context, including support for and skills in using technology.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information Economics and Policy\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100950\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016762452100038X/pdfft?md5=4e6723507cceccb492daf783d2f10171&pid=1-s2.0-S016762452100038X-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"47\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information Economics and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016762452100038X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Economics and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016762452100038X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 47

摘要

信息和通信技术(ICT)通常被认为是一种使政府更加透明、负责任和减少腐败的积极工具。然而,关于它的证据是混杂的,而且经常被误解。因此,本文对信息通信技术工具对腐败的影响进行了系统的评估,提供了一种细致入微的、视情况而定的评估。审查的工具包括数字公共服务、众包平台、举报工具、透明度门户、分布式账本技术和人工智能。我们仔细审查了信息通信技术的反腐败有效性和滥用腐败的证据。利用各种技术的共性,我们发现信息通信技术可以通过多种方式影响公共监督来支持反腐败:使举报腐败成为可能,促进透明度和问责制,促进公民参与和政府与公民的互动。然而,信息通信技术也可以通过暗网、加密货币或滥用中央数据库等技术提供新的腐败机会。信息通信技术工具的引入不会自动转化为反腐败成果;相反,影响取决于信息和通信技术工具与当地情况之间的匹配,包括对技术使用的支持和技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are emerging technologies helping win the fight against corruption? A review of the state of evidence

Information and Communication Technology (ICT) is often thought of as a uniformly positive tool making governments more transparent, accountable, and less corrupt. However, the evidence on it is mixed and often misunderstood. Hence, this article carries out a systematic stocktaking of ICT tools’ impact on corruption, offering a nuanced and context-dependent assessment. The tools reviewed are digital public services, crowdsourcing platforms, whistleblowing tools, transparency portals, distributed ledger technology, and artificial intelligence. We scrutinise the evidence both on ICTs’ anticorruption effectiveness and misuse for corruption. Drawing on the commonalities across technologies, we find that ICT can support anti-corruption by impacting public scrutiny in numerous ways: enabling reporting on corruption, promoting transparency and accountability, facilitating citizen participation and government-citizen interactions. However, ICT can also provide new corruption opportunities through the dark web, cryptocurrencies, or the misuse of technologies such as centralised databases. The introduction of ICT tools does not automatically translate into anti-corruption outcomes; rather, impact hinges on the matching between ICT tools and the local context, including support for and skills in using technology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
10.70%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: IEP is an international journal that aims to publish peer-reviewed policy-oriented research about the production, distribution and use of information, including these subjects: the economics of the telecommunications, mass media, and other information industries, the economics of innovation and intellectual property, the role of information in economic development, and the role of information and information technology in the functioning of markets. The purpose of the journal is to provide an interdisciplinary and international forum for theoretical and empirical research that addresses the needs of other researchers, government, and professionals who are involved in the policy-making process. IEP publishes research papers, short contributions, and surveys.
期刊最新文献
Three things about mobile app commissions Digital payment systems in emerging economies: Lessons from Kenya, India, Brazil, and Peru “I don't care about cookies!” data disclosure and time-inconsistent users Algorithms in the marketplace: An empirical analysis of automated pricing in e-commerce Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1