围手术期病例报告指南:麻醉病例报告(ACRE)标准对土耳其语的适应

Q4 Medicine Anestezi Dergisi Pub Date : 2022-04-28 DOI:10.54875/jarss.2022.52386
Murat Izgi, T. Bayir, M. Tümer
{"title":"围手术期病例报告指南:麻醉病例报告(ACRE)标准对土耳其语的适应","authors":"Murat Izgi, T. Bayir, M. Tümer","doi":"10.54875/jarss.2022.52386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study was carried out in order to create the Turkish version of the Anaesthesia Case Report (ACRE) criteria, to increase the quality of perioperative case reports in the field of anaesthesiology and reanimation and to establish a standard in this field. Methods: These criterias were translated into Turkish inde-pendently by authors and then a draft was determined.In order to ensure language equivalence, the adapted checklist was checked by an expert translator and the final version was created by mak-ing necessary corrections. Then, 20 case reports published between 2016 and 2021, indexed in the Turkish Medical Index, were examined by two independent specialists in the field of anaesthesiology and reanimation. Finally, inter-rater agreement was evalu-ated using the Bland-Altman method by calculating the intra-class correlation coefficient (CCT) and agreement percentages. Results: The case report studies analyzed as a result of the evaluations made differed in the reporting frequency of the criteria. Although CCT values varied between 0.484 and 0.905, the agreement between anaesthesiology and reanimation specialists was statistically significant (p<0.05). According to the Bland-Altman chart, agreement was found between the raters. Conclusion: Although ACRE criteria are rarely required for the review of perioperative case reports, there is solid evidence that standardized reporting guidelines improve the reporting quality of studies. It is thought that ACRE will bring a measurable standard status to case reports, and it will be beneficial and guide for researchers who will work in the field of anaesthesiology and reanimation in our country.","PeriodicalId":36000,"journal":{"name":"Anestezi Dergisi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Guide for Reporting Perioperative Cases: Adaptation of Anaesthesia Case Report (ACRE) Criteria into Turkish\",\"authors\":\"Murat Izgi, T. Bayir, M. Tümer\",\"doi\":\"10.54875/jarss.2022.52386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: This study was carried out in order to create the Turkish version of the Anaesthesia Case Report (ACRE) criteria, to increase the quality of perioperative case reports in the field of anaesthesiology and reanimation and to establish a standard in this field. Methods: These criterias were translated into Turkish inde-pendently by authors and then a draft was determined.In order to ensure language equivalence, the adapted checklist was checked by an expert translator and the final version was created by mak-ing necessary corrections. Then, 20 case reports published between 2016 and 2021, indexed in the Turkish Medical Index, were examined by two independent specialists in the field of anaesthesiology and reanimation. Finally, inter-rater agreement was evalu-ated using the Bland-Altman method by calculating the intra-class correlation coefficient (CCT) and agreement percentages. Results: The case report studies analyzed as a result of the evaluations made differed in the reporting frequency of the criteria. Although CCT values varied between 0.484 and 0.905, the agreement between anaesthesiology and reanimation specialists was statistically significant (p<0.05). According to the Bland-Altman chart, agreement was found between the raters. Conclusion: Although ACRE criteria are rarely required for the review of perioperative case reports, there is solid evidence that standardized reporting guidelines improve the reporting quality of studies. It is thought that ACRE will bring a measurable standard status to case reports, and it will be beneficial and guide for researchers who will work in the field of anaesthesiology and reanimation in our country.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anestezi Dergisi\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anestezi Dergisi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54875/jarss.2022.52386\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anestezi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54875/jarss.2022.52386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在制定土耳其版的麻醉学病例报告(ACRE)标准,提高麻醉学和复苏领域围手术期病例报告的质量,并建立该领域的标准。方法:作者将这些标准独立翻译成土耳其语,然后确定草案。为了确保语言的对等性,由一名专业翻译检查了经过调整的检查表,并通过进行必要的更正创建了最终版本。然后,两名麻醉学和复活领域的独立专家对2016年至2021年间发表的20份病例报告进行了检查,这些报告被编入土耳其医学索引。最后,通过计算类内相关系数(CCT)和一致性百分比,使用Bland-Altman方法评估评分者之间的一致性。结果:作为评估结果分析的病例报告研究在标准的报告频率上存在差异。尽管CCT值在0.484和0.905之间变化,但麻醉学专家和复活专家之间的一致性具有统计学意义(p<0.05)。根据Bland-Altman图表,评分者之间存在一致性。结论:尽管围手术期病例报告的审查很少需要ACRE标准,但有确凿证据表明,标准化报告指南可以提高研究的报告质量。认为ACRE将为病例报告带来一个可测量的标准状态,对我国麻醉学和复苏学领域的研究人员将是有益的和指导性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Guide for Reporting Perioperative Cases: Adaptation of Anaesthesia Case Report (ACRE) Criteria into Turkish
Objective: This study was carried out in order to create the Turkish version of the Anaesthesia Case Report (ACRE) criteria, to increase the quality of perioperative case reports in the field of anaesthesiology and reanimation and to establish a standard in this field. Methods: These criterias were translated into Turkish inde-pendently by authors and then a draft was determined.In order to ensure language equivalence, the adapted checklist was checked by an expert translator and the final version was created by mak-ing necessary corrections. Then, 20 case reports published between 2016 and 2021, indexed in the Turkish Medical Index, were examined by two independent specialists in the field of anaesthesiology and reanimation. Finally, inter-rater agreement was evalu-ated using the Bland-Altman method by calculating the intra-class correlation coefficient (CCT) and agreement percentages. Results: The case report studies analyzed as a result of the evaluations made differed in the reporting frequency of the criteria. Although CCT values varied between 0.484 and 0.905, the agreement between anaesthesiology and reanimation specialists was statistically significant (p<0.05). According to the Bland-Altman chart, agreement was found between the raters. Conclusion: Although ACRE criteria are rarely required for the review of perioperative case reports, there is solid evidence that standardized reporting guidelines improve the reporting quality of studies. It is thought that ACRE will bring a measurable standard status to case reports, and it will be beneficial and guide for researchers who will work in the field of anaesthesiology and reanimation in our country.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anestezi Dergisi
Anestezi Dergisi Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊最新文献
Perioperative Hypothermia and Associated Factors: A Prospective Cohort Study Evaluation of the Knowledge, Skills and Practices on Rapid Sequence Intubation of Physicians Working in Anesthesiology and Reanimation Clinics in Turkey: Survey Study Indispensable for Anesthesia and Intensive Care Units: End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide and Capnography: A Bibliometric Analysis during 1980-2022 Inadequancy and Differences about the Attitudes in Pain Control of Cancer Patients: Assessment of Algology Department Acute Hepatic Injury Following Cardiac Surgery: Retrospective Observational Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1