对“森林生态系统破坏非法起诉”的科学批评

R. G. Garrido
{"title":"对“森林生态系统破坏非法起诉”的科学批评","authors":"R. G. Garrido","doi":"10.22197/rbdpp.v8i2.745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This scientific criticism was based on what was proposed in the article “Unlawful prosecution regarding forest ecosystem destruction,” aiming to expand its discussion, especially from a comparison between the Polish and the Brazilian reality. For this purpose, exploratory, documentary, and bibliographic research was carried out, allowing the recognition that the similarities in the prosecution of environmental crimes bring both countries closer together than they are further apart despite clear distinctions of environmental reality and criminal procedural diversity, especially concerning evidence.","PeriodicalId":41933,"journal":{"name":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scientific criticism of “Unlawful prosecution regarding forest ecosystem destruction\",\"authors\":\"R. G. Garrido\",\"doi\":\"10.22197/rbdpp.v8i2.745\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This scientific criticism was based on what was proposed in the article “Unlawful prosecution regarding forest ecosystem destruction,” aiming to expand its discussion, especially from a comparison between the Polish and the Brazilian reality. For this purpose, exploratory, documentary, and bibliographic research was carried out, allowing the recognition that the similarities in the prosecution of environmental crimes bring both countries closer together than they are further apart despite clear distinctions of environmental reality and criminal procedural diversity, especially concerning evidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41933,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v8i2.745\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v8i2.745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这一科学批评是基于文章“关于森林生态系统破坏的非法起诉”中提出的内容,旨在扩大讨论范围,特别是通过对波兰和巴西现实的比较。为此目的,进行了探索性研究、文献研究和书目研究,认识到环境犯罪起诉方面的相似之处使两国联系更紧密,而不是彼此疏远,尽管环境现实和刑事诉讼程序的多样性,特别是在证据方面存在明显差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Scientific criticism of “Unlawful prosecution regarding forest ecosystem destruction
This scientific criticism was based on what was proposed in the article “Unlawful prosecution regarding forest ecosystem destruction,” aiming to expand its discussion, especially from a comparison between the Polish and the Brazilian reality. For this purpose, exploratory, documentary, and bibliographic research was carried out, allowing the recognition that the similarities in the prosecution of environmental crimes bring both countries closer together than they are further apart despite clear distinctions of environmental reality and criminal procedural diversity, especially concerning evidence.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
66.70%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Legalidade “versus” jurisdicionalidade na execução penal? Ônus financeiro da monitoração eletrônica em decisões do TRF-4 Deciding not to decide Intersecções entre o Eficientismo Processual Penal e o Neoliberalismo Desnaturalización del doble conforme y desbordamiento de carga procesal en el Perú a propósito de la Ley N° 31592, ley que modifica la condena del absuelto Balancing Self-Incrimination and Public Safety: A Comparative Analysis of Compelled Smartphone Unlocking in Brazilian and U.S. Legal Systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1