英语教学航运课程的有效性评估

IF 2 Q3 BUSINESS Maritime Business Review Pub Date : 2020-06-07 DOI:10.1108/mabr-10-2019-0042
P. Tseng, Nick Pilcher, Kendall Richards
{"title":"英语教学航运课程的有效性评估","authors":"P. Tseng, Nick Pilcher, Kendall Richards","doi":"10.1108/mabr-10-2019-0042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nShipping courses contain much technical and specialist knowledge and present particular challenges for English medium instruction (EMI). This paper aims to investigate both student perceptions of the importance and satisfaction level of EMI in shipping courses in higher education in Taiwan and the perceptions of expert stakeholders through qualitative interviews.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nImportance-performance analysis (IPA) is used to gather data on participants’ perceptions of what is (un)important and (un)satisfactory. Based on past studies, four dimensions with 20 items were developed and 121 effective questionnaires were collected. Further, qualitative interviews with expert stakeholders (n = 9) are undertaken to gather data to contextualize and complement the quantitative student data.\n\n\nFindings\nFindings show students attributed high importance but low satisfaction to items such as course learning objectives and students’ English level, and low importance and high satisfaction to items such as electronic teaching platform and relevance of subject to practice. Factor analysis and cluster analysis were used to divide samples into three groups. Qualitative interview results confirm many of the quantitative findings but also show where some quantitative findings require more attention or investment when delivering EMI programmes.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nQuestionnaire samples focus on university students. Other related field samples (e.g. EMI teachers, shipping teachers, English teachers, etc.) could be surveyed and compared in future studies. Qualitative interviews could also be expanded to other stakeholders such as government policymakers.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe findings of IPA in the shipping courses and the qualitative interviews can be used for both teaching design and implementation in related courses by university lecturers and other stakeholders (e.g. policy and decision-makers). Such approaches can enhance students’ learning motivation and teaching performance.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThis paper provides important guidance and diagnosis for how to introduce English teaching in shipping courses. Related courses can be further applied in higher education to popularize and promote EMI teaching in shipping and related fields.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nEMI has seldom been studied in the context of shipping courses in the past. This paper adopts IPA method and qualitative interviews to complement previous studies and address gaps in recent research. It is expected that the research findings could be adapted and applied in other fields.\n","PeriodicalId":43865,"journal":{"name":"Maritime Business Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/mabr-10-2019-0042","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring the effectiveness of English Medium Instruction Shipping courses\",\"authors\":\"P. Tseng, Nick Pilcher, Kendall Richards\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/mabr-10-2019-0042\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nShipping courses contain much technical and specialist knowledge and present particular challenges for English medium instruction (EMI). This paper aims to investigate both student perceptions of the importance and satisfaction level of EMI in shipping courses in higher education in Taiwan and the perceptions of expert stakeholders through qualitative interviews.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nImportance-performance analysis (IPA) is used to gather data on participants’ perceptions of what is (un)important and (un)satisfactory. Based on past studies, four dimensions with 20 items were developed and 121 effective questionnaires were collected. Further, qualitative interviews with expert stakeholders (n = 9) are undertaken to gather data to contextualize and complement the quantitative student data.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nFindings show students attributed high importance but low satisfaction to items such as course learning objectives and students’ English level, and low importance and high satisfaction to items such as electronic teaching platform and relevance of subject to practice. Factor analysis and cluster analysis were used to divide samples into three groups. Qualitative interview results confirm many of the quantitative findings but also show where some quantitative findings require more attention or investment when delivering EMI programmes.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nQuestionnaire samples focus on university students. Other related field samples (e.g. EMI teachers, shipping teachers, English teachers, etc.) could be surveyed and compared in future studies. Qualitative interviews could also be expanded to other stakeholders such as government policymakers.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe findings of IPA in the shipping courses and the qualitative interviews can be used for both teaching design and implementation in related courses by university lecturers and other stakeholders (e.g. policy and decision-makers). Such approaches can enhance students’ learning motivation and teaching performance.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nThis paper provides important guidance and diagnosis for how to introduce English teaching in shipping courses. Related courses can be further applied in higher education to popularize and promote EMI teaching in shipping and related fields.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nEMI has seldom been studied in the context of shipping courses in the past. This paper adopts IPA method and qualitative interviews to complement previous studies and address gaps in recent research. It is expected that the research findings could be adapted and applied in other fields.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Maritime Business Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/mabr-10-2019-0042\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Maritime Business Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/mabr-10-2019-0042\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maritime Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mabr-10-2019-0042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的航运课程包含许多技术和专业知识,对英语教学(EMI)提出了特殊的挑战。本文旨在通过质性访谈,调查台湾学生对航运课程中EMI重要性和满意度的认知,以及专家利益相关者的认知。设计/方法/方法重要性绩效分析(IPA)用于收集参与者对什么是(不)重要和(不)令人满意的看法的数据。在以往研究的基础上,开发了4个维度,共20个项目,收集了121份有效问卷。此外,还对专家利益相关者(n=9)进行了定性访谈,以收集数据,从而对定量学生数据进行情境化和补充。调查结果显示,学生对课程学习目标和学生英语水平等项目的重视程度较高,但满意度较低,对电子教学平台和学科与实践的相关性等项目的关注程度较低,满意度较高。采用因子分析和聚类分析将样本分为三组。定性访谈结果证实了许多定量调查结果,但也表明了一些定量调查结果在提供EMI节目时需要更多关注或投资。研究局限性/含义问卷样本主要针对大学生。在未来的研究中,可以对其他相关的实地样本(如EMI教师、航运教师、英语教师等)进行调查和比较。定性访谈也可以扩大到其他利益攸关方,如政府决策者。实际含义IPA在航运课程和定性访谈中的发现可用于大学讲师和其他利益相关者(如政策制定者和决策者)在相关课程中的教学设计和实施。这种方法可以提高学生的学习动机和教学成绩。社会含义本文对如何在航运课程中引入英语教学提供了重要的指导和诊断。相关课程可进一步应用于高等教育,普及和推广航运及相关领域的EMI教学。创意/价值EMI在过去很少在航运课程的背景下进行研究。本文采用IPA方法和定性访谈来补充以往的研究,并填补最近研究中的空白。预计这些研究结果可以被改编并应用于其他领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Measuring the effectiveness of English Medium Instruction Shipping courses
Purpose Shipping courses contain much technical and specialist knowledge and present particular challenges for English medium instruction (EMI). This paper aims to investigate both student perceptions of the importance and satisfaction level of EMI in shipping courses in higher education in Taiwan and the perceptions of expert stakeholders through qualitative interviews. Design/methodology/approach Importance-performance analysis (IPA) is used to gather data on participants’ perceptions of what is (un)important and (un)satisfactory. Based on past studies, four dimensions with 20 items were developed and 121 effective questionnaires were collected. Further, qualitative interviews with expert stakeholders (n = 9) are undertaken to gather data to contextualize and complement the quantitative student data. Findings Findings show students attributed high importance but low satisfaction to items such as course learning objectives and students’ English level, and low importance and high satisfaction to items such as electronic teaching platform and relevance of subject to practice. Factor analysis and cluster analysis were used to divide samples into three groups. Qualitative interview results confirm many of the quantitative findings but also show where some quantitative findings require more attention or investment when delivering EMI programmes. Research limitations/implications Questionnaire samples focus on university students. Other related field samples (e.g. EMI teachers, shipping teachers, English teachers, etc.) could be surveyed and compared in future studies. Qualitative interviews could also be expanded to other stakeholders such as government policymakers. Practical implications The findings of IPA in the shipping courses and the qualitative interviews can be used for both teaching design and implementation in related courses by university lecturers and other stakeholders (e.g. policy and decision-makers). Such approaches can enhance students’ learning motivation and teaching performance. Social implications This paper provides important guidance and diagnosis for how to introduce English teaching in shipping courses. Related courses can be further applied in higher education to popularize and promote EMI teaching in shipping and related fields. Originality/value EMI has seldom been studied in the context of shipping courses in the past. This paper adopts IPA method and qualitative interviews to complement previous studies and address gaps in recent research. It is expected that the research findings could be adapted and applied in other fields.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Predictive modelling in the shipping industry: analysis from supply and demand sides Electric tugboat deployment in maritime transportation: detailed analysis of advantages and disadvantages Discovering supply chain operation towards sustainability using machine learning and DES techniques: a case study in Vietnam seafood Maritime logistics and digital transformation with big data: review and research trend Assessing risk dimensions in dry port projects: prioritization, interdependence and heterogeneity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1