刑法体系中的一般预防义务

Q4 Social Sciences Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica Pub Date : 2022-06-02 DOI:10.14712/23366478.2022.26
Anežka Janoušková
{"title":"刑法体系中的一般预防义务","authors":"Anežka Janoušková","doi":"10.14712/23366478.2022.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper at hand deals with role and function of the general prevention duty in tort law as introduced by the Czech Civil Code in 2014. The general prevention duty has been taken over from the former Civil Code with some minor legislative amendments. On the other hand, basic rules for tort liability have changed significantly. As opposed to the previous general tort law provision, the new tort law was modelled upon the German concept of liability. However, German tort law does not explicitly provide for a general prevention duty. As the paper points out, this creates a unique combination of rules that need to be examined and discussed thoroughly. The paper at hand strives to be part of the discussion and tackle the issue of whether the traditional understanding of the general prevention duty needs to be reassessed and if so, how. It poses major questions, which arise due to the aforementioned changes. It further evaluates existing opinions on the matter and elaborates on possible solutions to the problem.","PeriodicalId":52921,"journal":{"name":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generální prevenční povinnost v systému deliktního práva\",\"authors\":\"Anežka Janoušková\",\"doi\":\"10.14712/23366478.2022.26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper at hand deals with role and function of the general prevention duty in tort law as introduced by the Czech Civil Code in 2014. The general prevention duty has been taken over from the former Civil Code with some minor legislative amendments. On the other hand, basic rules for tort liability have changed significantly. As opposed to the previous general tort law provision, the new tort law was modelled upon the German concept of liability. However, German tort law does not explicitly provide for a general prevention duty. As the paper points out, this creates a unique combination of rules that need to be examined and discussed thoroughly. The paper at hand strives to be part of the discussion and tackle the issue of whether the traditional understanding of the general prevention duty needs to be reassessed and if so, how. It poses major questions, which arise due to the aforementioned changes. It further evaluates existing opinions on the matter and elaborates on possible solutions to the problem.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2022.26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Universitatis Carolinae Iuridica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23366478.2022.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文论述了《捷克民法典》于2014年引入的一般预防义务在侵权法中的作用和作用。一般预防义务已从前《民法典》中接管,并进行了一些小的立法修订。另一方面,侵权责任的基本规则发生了重大变化。与以前的一般侵权法条款不同,新的侵权法是以德国的责任概念为蓝本的。然而,德国侵权法并没有明确规定一般的预防义务。正如论文所指出的,这创造了一个独特的规则组合,需要彻底检查和讨论。手头的文件努力成为讨论的一部分,并解决是否需要重新评估对一般预防义务的传统理解,如果需要,如何重新评估的问题。它提出了由于上述变化而产生的重大问题。它进一步评估了对该问题的现有意见,并阐述了解决该问题的可能办法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Generální prevenční povinnost v systému deliktního práva
The paper at hand deals with role and function of the general prevention duty in tort law as introduced by the Czech Civil Code in 2014. The general prevention duty has been taken over from the former Civil Code with some minor legislative amendments. On the other hand, basic rules for tort liability have changed significantly. As opposed to the previous general tort law provision, the new tort law was modelled upon the German concept of liability. However, German tort law does not explicitly provide for a general prevention duty. As the paper points out, this creates a unique combination of rules that need to be examined and discussed thoroughly. The paper at hand strives to be part of the discussion and tackle the issue of whether the traditional understanding of the general prevention duty needs to be reassessed and if so, how. It poses major questions, which arise due to the aforementioned changes. It further evaluates existing opinions on the matter and elaborates on possible solutions to the problem.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Z vědeckého života: zpráva z mezinárodní vědecké konference Opravné systémy a opravné prostředky v trestním řízení Koncept kontradiktornosti v trestním řízení Problematické aspekty základních zásad v návrhu rekodifikace trestního procesu Využitelnost dohody o vině a trestu a prohlášení viny v jednotlivých stadiích trestního řízení Zajištění informací a věcí v návrhu nového trestního řádu
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1