从歌德的《普罗米修斯》和《木卫三》看主体性和哲学概念化

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN Publications of the English Goethe Society Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/09593683.2022.2027733
C. S. Muenzer
{"title":"从歌德的《普罗米修斯》和《木卫三》看主体性和哲学概念化","authors":"C. S. Muenzer","doi":"10.1080/09593683.2022.2027733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Guided by the process philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead and the transcendental materialism of Gilles Deleuze, this reading of Goethe’s ‘Prometheus’ and ‘Ganymed’ constructs the hymns’ defining polarity with reference to the ‘subjective aims’ of their ‘conceptual personae’. While each mythological figure is driven by a primordial ‘feeling’ along its separate path of ‘satisfaction’, the sum of their grasping moves, or physical and mental ‘prehensions’, constitutes a field of conceptualization that is post-theological and protophilosophical. The problematic Promethean ‘I’, according to this interpretive framing, undergoes a transformative reconfiguration in ‘Ganymed’ through the strategic deployment of the lexemes fassen and fangen, so that its counterpart in subject formation ultimately becomes a Whiteheadian ‘superject’.","PeriodicalId":40789,"journal":{"name":"Publications of the English Goethe Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Whiteheadian Take on Subjectivity and Philosophical Conceptualization in Goethe’s ‘Prometheus’ and ‘Ganymed’\",\"authors\":\"C. S. Muenzer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09593683.2022.2027733\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Guided by the process philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead and the transcendental materialism of Gilles Deleuze, this reading of Goethe’s ‘Prometheus’ and ‘Ganymed’ constructs the hymns’ defining polarity with reference to the ‘subjective aims’ of their ‘conceptual personae’. While each mythological figure is driven by a primordial ‘feeling’ along its separate path of ‘satisfaction’, the sum of their grasping moves, or physical and mental ‘prehensions’, constitutes a field of conceptualization that is post-theological and protophilosophical. The problematic Promethean ‘I’, according to this interpretive framing, undergoes a transformative reconfiguration in ‘Ganymed’ through the strategic deployment of the lexemes fassen and fangen, so that its counterpart in subject formation ultimately becomes a Whiteheadian ‘superject’.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40789,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Publications of the English Goethe Society\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Publications of the English Goethe Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593683.2022.2027733\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Publications of the English Goethe Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09593683.2022.2027733","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要在阿尔弗雷德·诺斯·怀特黑德的过程哲学和吉勒·德勒兹的先验唯物主义的指导下,阅读歌德的《普罗米修斯》和《木卫三》,参照其“概念人物”的“主观目的”,构建了赞美诗的“定义极性”。虽然每个神话人物都是由一种原始的“感觉”沿着其独立的“满足”路径驱动的,但他们的抓握动作,或身体和心理的“抓握”的总和,构成了一个后神学和原哲学的概念化领域。根据这一解释框架,有问题的普罗米修斯“I”在《木卫三》中通过词汇fassen和fangen的战略部署进行了变革性的重新配置,从而使其在主体形成中的对应物最终成为怀特黑德式的“超级对象”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Whiteheadian Take on Subjectivity and Philosophical Conceptualization in Goethe’s ‘Prometheus’ and ‘Ganymed’
ABSTRACT Guided by the process philosophy of Alfred North Whitehead and the transcendental materialism of Gilles Deleuze, this reading of Goethe’s ‘Prometheus’ and ‘Ganymed’ constructs the hymns’ defining polarity with reference to the ‘subjective aims’ of their ‘conceptual personae’. While each mythological figure is driven by a primordial ‘feeling’ along its separate path of ‘satisfaction’, the sum of their grasping moves, or physical and mental ‘prehensions’, constitutes a field of conceptualization that is post-theological and protophilosophical. The problematic Promethean ‘I’, according to this interpretive framing, undergoes a transformative reconfiguration in ‘Ganymed’ through the strategic deployment of the lexemes fassen and fangen, so that its counterpart in subject formation ultimately becomes a Whiteheadian ‘superject’.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Publications of the English Goethe Society
Publications of the English Goethe Society LITERATURE, GERMAN, DUTCH, SCANDINAVIAN-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
The Battle of the Statues in Berlin, 1859–71: Reflections on the Public Image and Standing of the German Classical Authors The Whirlwind of the Biosphere: On Vernadsky’s Goethean Cosmos – An Introduction to Vernadsky’s Goethe Essay Vladimir Vernadsky’s ‘Thoughts and Observations on Goethe as a Naturalist’: Its Prehistory and Reception Thoughts and Observations on Goethe as a Naturalist* ‘Gestaltenlehre ist Verwandlungslehre’: Zur ‘genetischen Methode’ als einem interdisziplinären Schlüsselkonzept Goethes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1