基于两个案例的落叶松球果热提取和热机械提取方法的比较

IF 2 4区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY International Agrophysics Pub Date : 2022-08-02 DOI:10.31545/intagr/150734
Ewa Tulska, M. Aniszewska
{"title":"基于两个案例的落叶松球果热提取和热机械提取方法的比较","authors":"Ewa Tulska, M. Aniszewska","doi":"10.31545/intagr/150734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":". The paper analyzes two seed extraction methods used by Polish silvicultural seed extractories. The analysis involves cone batches as well as individual cones processed in extraction cabinets. During thermal extraction, the cones were dried (10 h), moistened with water (10 min), and dried again (10 h). During thermomechanical extraction, the cones were dried for a much longer time (40 h), and then crushed in a mechanical unit (20 min). The two examined cases of seed extraction were compared in terms of the size, weight, and moisture content of the cones involved, the steps in the extraction process, as well as the quantity and quality of the obtained seeds. Each of the extractories made use of cones of a different provenance, which differed significantly from each other. In order to compare the different seed extraction methods, the same batch of cones collected from one geographic locality should be used. The results of a process analysis show that the thermal method was superior in terms of energy efficiency and duration. The seeds extracted using the two methods were of the highest quality (class I), which indicates that in both cases the extraction process was conducted appropriately and did not cause the quality of the seeds to deteriorate.","PeriodicalId":13959,"journal":{"name":"International Agrophysics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of thermal and thermomechanical methods of seed extraction\\nfrom larch cones based on two case studies\",\"authors\":\"Ewa Tulska, M. Aniszewska\",\"doi\":\"10.31545/intagr/150734\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\". The paper analyzes two seed extraction methods used by Polish silvicultural seed extractories. The analysis involves cone batches as well as individual cones processed in extraction cabinets. During thermal extraction, the cones were dried (10 h), moistened with water (10 min), and dried again (10 h). During thermomechanical extraction, the cones were dried for a much longer time (40 h), and then crushed in a mechanical unit (20 min). The two examined cases of seed extraction were compared in terms of the size, weight, and moisture content of the cones involved, the steps in the extraction process, as well as the quantity and quality of the obtained seeds. Each of the extractories made use of cones of a different provenance, which differed significantly from each other. In order to compare the different seed extraction methods, the same batch of cones collected from one geographic locality should be used. The results of a process analysis show that the thermal method was superior in terms of energy efficiency and duration. The seeds extracted using the two methods were of the highest quality (class I), which indicates that in both cases the extraction process was conducted appropriately and did not cause the quality of the seeds to deteriorate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13959,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Agrophysics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Agrophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31545/intagr/150734\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Agrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31545/intagr/150734","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文分析了波兰造林种子提取物的两种种子提取方法。该分析涉及锥批以及在提取柜中处理的单个锥。在热提取过程中,将锥体干燥(10小时),用水润湿(10分钟),然后再次干燥(10 h)。在热机械提取过程中,将锥体干燥更长的时间(40小时),然后在机械单元中压碎(20分钟)。从所涉及的球果的大小、重量和水分含量、提取过程中的步骤以及获得的种子的数量和质量等方面对两种检查过的种子提取情况进行了比较。每种提取物都使用了不同来源的锥体,这些锥体彼此之间存在显著差异。为了比较不同的种子提取方法,应该使用从一个地理位置收集的同一批球果。过程分析的结果表明,热法在能源效率和持续时间方面是优越的。使用这两种方法提取的种子质量最高(I类),这表明在这两种情况下,提取过程都进行得适当,不会导致种子质量恶化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of thermal and thermomechanical methods of seed extraction from larch cones based on two case studies
. The paper analyzes two seed extraction methods used by Polish silvicultural seed extractories. The analysis involves cone batches as well as individual cones processed in extraction cabinets. During thermal extraction, the cones were dried (10 h), moistened with water (10 min), and dried again (10 h). During thermomechanical extraction, the cones were dried for a much longer time (40 h), and then crushed in a mechanical unit (20 min). The two examined cases of seed extraction were compared in terms of the size, weight, and moisture content of the cones involved, the steps in the extraction process, as well as the quantity and quality of the obtained seeds. Each of the extractories made use of cones of a different provenance, which differed significantly from each other. In order to compare the different seed extraction methods, the same batch of cones collected from one geographic locality should be used. The results of a process analysis show that the thermal method was superior in terms of energy efficiency and duration. The seeds extracted using the two methods were of the highest quality (class I), which indicates that in both cases the extraction process was conducted appropriately and did not cause the quality of the seeds to deteriorate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Agrophysics
International Agrophysics 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
9.10%
发文量
27
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The journal is focused on the soil-plant-atmosphere system. The journal publishes original research and review papers on any subject regarding soil, plant and atmosphere and the interface in between. Manuscripts on postharvest processing and quality of crops are also welcomed. Particularly the journal is focused on the following areas: implications of agricultural land use, soil management and climate change on production of biomass and renewable energy, soil structure, cycling of carbon, water, heat and nutrients, biota, greenhouse gases and environment, soil-plant-atmosphere continuum and ways of its regulation to increase efficiency of water, energy and chemicals in agriculture, postharvest management and processing of agricultural and horticultural products in relation to food quality and safety, mathematical modeling of physical processes affecting environment quality, plant production and postharvest processing, advances in sensors and communication devices to measure and collect information about physical conditions in agricultural and natural environments. Papers accepted in the International Agrophysics should reveal substantial novelty and include thoughtful physical, biological and chemical interpretation and accurate description of the methods used. All manuscripts are initially checked on topic suitability and linguistic quality.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning-based soil aggregation assessment under four scenarios in northwestern Iran Evaluation of the changes in Bekker's parameters and their use in determining the rolling resistance Study of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seed rehydration observed by the Dent generalized model and 1H-NMR relaxometry Investigation of vegetation dynamics with a focus on agricultural land cover and its relation with meteorological parameters based on the remote sensing techniques: a case study of the Gavkhoni watershed Vis/NIR and FTIR spectroscopy supported by machine learning techniques to distinguish pure from impure Iranian rice varieties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1