农村地区对当地供应冲击的经济反应:来自被占领西岸的证据*

IF 0.9 Q4 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Middle East Development Journal Pub Date : 2018-01-02 DOI:10.1080/17938120.2018.1446235
Belal N. Fallah
{"title":"农村地区对当地供应冲击的经济反应:来自被占领西岸的证据*","authors":"Belal N. Fallah","doi":"10.1080/17938120.2018.1446235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT As the Second Intifada broke out at the end of 2000, Israel severely restricted entry for Palestinians to its labor market, forcing a great section of commuters to return to their local labor markets. This paper examines the economic effect of the return commuting on non-commuters in rural areas of the Occupied West Bank. Utilizing place-of-work, repeated cross-section data, the results show that returned commuting has negative repercussions. Specifically, wages decrease for workers with the same skill type (low skilled). The results also provide evidence that favors the crowd-out effect hypothesis. The estimated probability of unemployment increases for non-commuters with disproportionate effect for job seekers relative to those reportedly employed. Consistent with this result, increases in return commuting prolong unemployment duration for the low skilled. The outcome of this paper helps understand how rural labor markets may respond to labor supply shocks.","PeriodicalId":43862,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Development Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17938120.2018.1446235","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The economic response of rural areas to local supply shock: evidence from the Occupied West Bank*\",\"authors\":\"Belal N. Fallah\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17938120.2018.1446235\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT As the Second Intifada broke out at the end of 2000, Israel severely restricted entry for Palestinians to its labor market, forcing a great section of commuters to return to their local labor markets. This paper examines the economic effect of the return commuting on non-commuters in rural areas of the Occupied West Bank. Utilizing place-of-work, repeated cross-section data, the results show that returned commuting has negative repercussions. Specifically, wages decrease for workers with the same skill type (low skilled). The results also provide evidence that favors the crowd-out effect hypothesis. The estimated probability of unemployment increases for non-commuters with disproportionate effect for job seekers relative to those reportedly employed. Consistent with this result, increases in return commuting prolong unemployment duration for the low skilled. The outcome of this paper helps understand how rural labor markets may respond to labor supply shocks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Middle East Development Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17938120.2018.1446235\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Middle East Development Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17938120.2018.1446235\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17938120.2018.1446235","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要随着2000年底第二次起义的爆发,以色列严格限制巴勒斯坦人进入其劳动力市场,迫使大量通勤者返回当地劳动力市场。本文研究了被占领西岸农村地区通勤对非通勤者的经济影响。利用工作地点、重复的横断面数据,结果表明,返程通勤具有负面影响。具体而言,具有相同技能类型(低技能)的工人的工资下降。研究结果也提供了支持排挤效应假说的证据。据估计,非通勤者的失业率增加,对求职者的影响与据报道的就业者不成比例。与这一结果一致的是,往返通勤的增加延长了低技能人群的失业时间。本文的结果有助于理解农村劳动力市场如何应对劳动力供应冲击。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The economic response of rural areas to local supply shock: evidence from the Occupied West Bank*
ABSTRACT As the Second Intifada broke out at the end of 2000, Israel severely restricted entry for Palestinians to its labor market, forcing a great section of commuters to return to their local labor markets. This paper examines the economic effect of the return commuting on non-commuters in rural areas of the Occupied West Bank. Utilizing place-of-work, repeated cross-section data, the results show that returned commuting has negative repercussions. Specifically, wages decrease for workers with the same skill type (low skilled). The results also provide evidence that favors the crowd-out effect hypothesis. The estimated probability of unemployment increases for non-commuters with disproportionate effect for job seekers relative to those reportedly employed. Consistent with this result, increases in return commuting prolong unemployment duration for the low skilled. The outcome of this paper helps understand how rural labor markets may respond to labor supply shocks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Middle East Development Journal
Middle East Development Journal DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
20.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Labor market transitions in Egypt post-Arab Spring Are asset quality weaknesses holding back bank lending? Evidence from MENA region How sanctions work. Iran and the impact of economic warfare Do non-natives catch-up with the natives in terms of earnings in Jordan? New evidence from a distributional analysis Capital flight and the real exchange rate: evidence from resource scarce MENA countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1