评论:“迷失在文学中”。认同为跨性别者的智障人士:叙述性回顾

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Tizard Learning Disability Review Pub Date : 2021-12-31 DOI:10.1108/tldr-11-2021-0034
Tessa-May Zirnsak
{"title":"评论:“迷失在文学中”。认同为跨性别者的智障人士:叙述性回顾","authors":"Tessa-May Zirnsak","doi":"10.1108/tldr-11-2021-0034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis paper aims to discuss the barriers that people with intellectual disabilities face to come out as transgender in the context of a paucity of research with or about this group.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe commentary and brief overview of trans participation in literature on people with intellectual disabilities presented in this paper is informed by a Queer Theory and Critical disabilities Studies approach.\n\n\nFindings\nResearchers in this area are correct that there is insufficient literature that addressed the experiences of trans people with intellectual disabilities; however, for trans people with intellectual disabilities to be involved in research they must first be safe to self-identify and come out in their communities and services. Existing research suggests that people with intellectual disabilities may face additional barriers to self-identifying as LGTBQ, and that for those who have claimed a trans identity, it is not safe to come out.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThere is a need for researchers and professional and lived experience experts to be engaged in policy and social research with the aim of creating safe spaces and communities for people with intellectual disabilities to explore and affirm their gender.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThere are no published papers that redirect focus from a paucity of research into the experiences of trans people with intellectual disabilities towards addressing why trans people with intellectual disabilities may choose not to come out in a context of hostility towards transgender identity in disabilities services.\n","PeriodicalId":54179,"journal":{"name":"Tizard Learning Disability Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commentary on: “Lost in the literature”. People with intellectual disabilities who identify as trans: a narrative review\",\"authors\":\"Tessa-May Zirnsak\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/tldr-11-2021-0034\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis paper aims to discuss the barriers that people with intellectual disabilities face to come out as transgender in the context of a paucity of research with or about this group.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe commentary and brief overview of trans participation in literature on people with intellectual disabilities presented in this paper is informed by a Queer Theory and Critical disabilities Studies approach.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nResearchers in this area are correct that there is insufficient literature that addressed the experiences of trans people with intellectual disabilities; however, for trans people with intellectual disabilities to be involved in research they must first be safe to self-identify and come out in their communities and services. Existing research suggests that people with intellectual disabilities may face additional barriers to self-identifying as LGTBQ, and that for those who have claimed a trans identity, it is not safe to come out.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nThere is a need for researchers and professional and lived experience experts to be engaged in policy and social research with the aim of creating safe spaces and communities for people with intellectual disabilities to explore and affirm their gender.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThere are no published papers that redirect focus from a paucity of research into the experiences of trans people with intellectual disabilities towards addressing why trans people with intellectual disabilities may choose not to come out in a context of hostility towards transgender identity in disabilities services.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":54179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tizard Learning Disability Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tizard Learning Disability Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/tldr-11-2021-0034\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tizard Learning Disability Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tldr-11-2021-0034","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本文旨在讨论在缺乏对这一群体的研究的情况下,智障人士成为跨性别者所面临的障碍。设计/方法论/方法本文对跨性别参与智障人士文献的评论和简要概述采用了酷儿理论和批判性残疾研究方法。发现这一领域的研究人员是正确的,没有足够的文献来描述智力残疾跨性别者的经历;然而,对于智力残疾的跨性别者来说,要参与研究,他们首先必须安全地自我认同,并在自己的社区和服务中露面。现有研究表明,智障人士在自我认同为LGTBQ方面可能面临额外的障碍,而对于那些声称拥有跨性别身份的人来说,出柜是不安全的。社会影响需要研究人员、专业和生活经验专家参与政策和社会研究,目的是为智障人士创造安全的空间和社区,让他们探索和确认自己的性别。原创性/价值没有发表的论文将焦点从对跨性别智障人士经历的研究不足转移到解决为什么跨性别智残疾人士可能会选择不在残疾服务中对跨性别身份怀有敌意的背景下出柜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Commentary on: “Lost in the literature”. People with intellectual disabilities who identify as trans: a narrative review
Purpose This paper aims to discuss the barriers that people with intellectual disabilities face to come out as transgender in the context of a paucity of research with or about this group. Design/methodology/approach The commentary and brief overview of trans participation in literature on people with intellectual disabilities presented in this paper is informed by a Queer Theory and Critical disabilities Studies approach. Findings Researchers in this area are correct that there is insufficient literature that addressed the experiences of trans people with intellectual disabilities; however, for trans people with intellectual disabilities to be involved in research they must first be safe to self-identify and come out in their communities and services. Existing research suggests that people with intellectual disabilities may face additional barriers to self-identifying as LGTBQ, and that for those who have claimed a trans identity, it is not safe to come out. Social implications There is a need for researchers and professional and lived experience experts to be engaged in policy and social research with the aim of creating safe spaces and communities for people with intellectual disabilities to explore and affirm their gender. Originality/value There are no published papers that redirect focus from a paucity of research into the experiences of trans people with intellectual disabilities towards addressing why trans people with intellectual disabilities may choose not to come out in a context of hostility towards transgender identity in disabilities services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tizard Learning Disability Review
Tizard Learning Disability Review EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
The effects of changing the classroom play environment on the peer interactions of autistic children with an intellectual disability Using the children’s accelerated trauma technique with adults with intellectual disabilities Commentary on “The effects of changing the classroom play environment on the peer interactions of autistic children with an intellectual disability” Frontline managers’ experiences of practice leadership for when supporting autistic adults with complex support needs residing in community housing Commentary on “Stakeholder experiences of deprescribing psychotropic medicines for challenging behaviour in people with intellectual disabilities”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1