尼日利亚中部科吉州法达马三世方案地区效率差异分析

Sunday Ojochonu Ali, G. Abu, Peter Iorhor Ater, G. Aye
{"title":"尼日利亚中部科吉州法达马三世方案地区效率差异分析","authors":"Sunday Ojochonu Ali, G. Abu, Peter Iorhor Ater, G. Aye","doi":"10.17306/j.jard.2022.01443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The impact of Fadama III programme on the efficiency levels of farmers in Kogi state, Nigeria was investigated. \nMaterials and methods: Primary data were obtained with a questionnaire administered to 382 respondents selected through a stratified random sampling procedure. The Cobb-Douglas stochastic frontier production and cost functions were employed in the analyses. The resulting efficiency estimates for beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries were compared using the t-test. \nMajor findings: Efficiency analyses indicate that the quantities of Seed, fertilizer and agrochemicals used were the drivers of technical efficiency among both categories of farmers, while costs of land, fertilizer and family labour were the drivers of allocative efficiency. Technical efficiency estimates for both categories of farmers were 0.79 and 0.71 respectively and respective allocative efficiency estimates were 1.22 and 1.44. Mean comparison of the technical efficiency levels indicated a t-estimate of 2.52 (α= 0.0124) in favour of the beneficiaries while a t-estimate of -24.56 (α= 0.000) indicated that beneficiaries were also more allocatively efficient. \nConclusion: The beneficiaries, by acquiring skills and supports from Fadama III, became were more efficient than their non-benefiting counterparts. Continuous training will assist farmers to improve their efficiencies and reduce the noticed deficits.","PeriodicalId":30385,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of efficiency differentials in Fadama III programme areas in Kogi State, Central Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"Sunday Ojochonu Ali, G. Abu, Peter Iorhor Ater, G. Aye\",\"doi\":\"10.17306/j.jard.2022.01443\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: The impact of Fadama III programme on the efficiency levels of farmers in Kogi state, Nigeria was investigated. \\nMaterials and methods: Primary data were obtained with a questionnaire administered to 382 respondents selected through a stratified random sampling procedure. The Cobb-Douglas stochastic frontier production and cost functions were employed in the analyses. The resulting efficiency estimates for beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries were compared using the t-test. \\nMajor findings: Efficiency analyses indicate that the quantities of Seed, fertilizer and agrochemicals used were the drivers of technical efficiency among both categories of farmers, while costs of land, fertilizer and family labour were the drivers of allocative efficiency. Technical efficiency estimates for both categories of farmers were 0.79 and 0.71 respectively and respective allocative efficiency estimates were 1.22 and 1.44. Mean comparison of the technical efficiency levels indicated a t-estimate of 2.52 (α= 0.0124) in favour of the beneficiaries while a t-estimate of -24.56 (α= 0.000) indicated that beneficiaries were also more allocatively efficient. \\nConclusion: The beneficiaries, by acquiring skills and supports from Fadama III, became were more efficient than their non-benefiting counterparts. Continuous training will assist farmers to improve their efficiencies and reduce the noticed deficits.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30385,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17306/j.jard.2022.01443\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agribusiness and Rural Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17306/j.jard.2022.01443","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:调查了Fadama III计划对尼日利亚科吉州农民效率水平的影响。材料和方法:通过分层随机抽样程序对382名受访者进行问卷调查,获得初步数据。分析中采用了Cobb—Douglas随机前沿生产函数和成本函数。使用t检验对受益人和非受益人的效率估计值进行比较。主要发现:效率分析表明,种子、化肥和农用化学品的使用量是这两类农民技术效率的驱动因素,而土地、化肥和家庭劳动力的成本是配置效率的驱动力。这两类农民的技术效率估计值分别为0.79和0.71,分配效率估计值为1.22和1.44。技术效率水平的平均比较表明,有利于受益人的t估计数为2.52(α=0.0124),而-24.56(α=0.000)的t估计值表明受益人的分配效率也更高。结论:受益人通过从法达玛三世那里获得技能和支持,变得比没有受益的同行更有效率。持续的培训将帮助农民提高效率,减少已发现的赤字。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of efficiency differentials in Fadama III programme areas in Kogi State, Central Nigeria
Introduction: The impact of Fadama III programme on the efficiency levels of farmers in Kogi state, Nigeria was investigated. Materials and methods: Primary data were obtained with a questionnaire administered to 382 respondents selected through a stratified random sampling procedure. The Cobb-Douglas stochastic frontier production and cost functions were employed in the analyses. The resulting efficiency estimates for beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries were compared using the t-test. Major findings: Efficiency analyses indicate that the quantities of Seed, fertilizer and agrochemicals used were the drivers of technical efficiency among both categories of farmers, while costs of land, fertilizer and family labour were the drivers of allocative efficiency. Technical efficiency estimates for both categories of farmers were 0.79 and 0.71 respectively and respective allocative efficiency estimates were 1.22 and 1.44. Mean comparison of the technical efficiency levels indicated a t-estimate of 2.52 (α= 0.0124) in favour of the beneficiaries while a t-estimate of -24.56 (α= 0.000) indicated that beneficiaries were also more allocatively efficient. Conclusion: The beneficiaries, by acquiring skills and supports from Fadama III, became were more efficient than their non-benefiting counterparts. Continuous training will assist farmers to improve their efficiencies and reduce the noticed deficits.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
DETERMINANTS OF FARMERS’ DECISION TO CHOICE MARKET OUTLETS: EVIDENCE FROM MILK PRODUCER FARMERS IN ADA’A BERGA DISTRICT ETHIOPIA PEARL MILLET, THE HOPE OF FOOD SECURITY IN MARGINAL ARID TROPICS: IMPLICATIONS FOR DIVERSIFYING LIMITED CROPPING SYSTEMS Shaping intention to pay attention to health claims ANALYSING CONTRIBUTION AND DETERMINANTS OF INDIGENOUS LEAFY VEGETABLES (ILVS) TO HOUSEHOLD INCOME OF RURAL HOUSEHOLDS IN THE EASTERN CAPE PROVINCE, SOUTH AFRICA STRENGTHENING THE COMPETITIVENESS OF THE LENTIL SEED SYSTEM OF NEPAL: A VALUE CHAIN APPROACH
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1