种姓、社会资本和劳动力市场中介的不稳定性:印度达利特劳动力承包商的案例

IF 4.9 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT Organization Studies Pub Date : 2023-05-04 DOI:10.1177/01708406231175319
V. Soundararajan, Garima Sharma, Hari Bapuji
{"title":"种姓、社会资本和劳动力市场中介的不稳定性:印度达利特劳动力承包商的案例","authors":"V. Soundararajan, Garima Sharma, Hari Bapuji","doi":"10.1177/01708406231175319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Research on precarity predominantly adopts a monolithic view of labour market intermediaries and ignores the differential distribution of precarity based on social group membership. This omission not only hinders a nuanced understanding of precarity but also prevents our ability to address inequalities. To address this, we examined the influence of caste on differential experiences of precarity among labour contractors in the garment industry in Tamil Nadu, India. We find that unequal distribution of social capital along caste lines leads to Dalit labour contractors experiencing greater precarity than their upper caste counterparts and also being stuck in such precarity. Specifically, caste-based dynamics of social capital threaten the survival of Dalit labour contractors by distorting their economic wellbeing and destabilising their leadership, and hinder their upward occupational mobility by confining their spatial mobility, limiting resourceful connections, and thwarting growth opportunities. Our study shines new light on how societal inequalities differentially distribute precarity among actors in the same occupation and underscores the intersectional nature of occupational precarity as well as the contextual nature of social capital.","PeriodicalId":48423,"journal":{"name":"Organization Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Caste, Social Capital and Precarity of Labour Market Intermediaries: The case of Dalit labour contractors in India\",\"authors\":\"V. Soundararajan, Garima Sharma, Hari Bapuji\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/01708406231175319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Research on precarity predominantly adopts a monolithic view of labour market intermediaries and ignores the differential distribution of precarity based on social group membership. This omission not only hinders a nuanced understanding of precarity but also prevents our ability to address inequalities. To address this, we examined the influence of caste on differential experiences of precarity among labour contractors in the garment industry in Tamil Nadu, India. We find that unequal distribution of social capital along caste lines leads to Dalit labour contractors experiencing greater precarity than their upper caste counterparts and also being stuck in such precarity. Specifically, caste-based dynamics of social capital threaten the survival of Dalit labour contractors by distorting their economic wellbeing and destabilising their leadership, and hinder their upward occupational mobility by confining their spatial mobility, limiting resourceful connections, and thwarting growth opportunities. Our study shines new light on how societal inequalities differentially distribute precarity among actors in the same occupation and underscores the intersectional nature of occupational precarity as well as the contextual nature of social capital.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48423,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Organization Studies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Organization Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406231175319\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Organization Studies","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/01708406231175319","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对不稳定性的研究主要采用劳动力市场中介的单一观点,而忽略了基于社会群体成员身份的不稳定性的差异分布。这种遗漏不仅阻碍了对不稳定性的细致理解,而且妨碍了我们解决不平等问题的能力。为了解决这个问题,我们研究了种姓对印度泰米尔纳德邦服装行业劳务承包商不稳定的不同经历的影响。我们发现,社会资本沿种姓线的不平等分配导致达利特劳动力承包商比高种姓同行经历更大的不稳定性,并且也陷入这种不稳定性。具体来说,基于种姓的社会资本动态通过扭曲达利特劳动力承包商的经济福利和破坏其领导地位来威胁他们的生存,并通过限制他们的空间流动性、限制资源联系和阻碍增长机会来阻碍他们向上的职业流动。我们的研究揭示了社会不平等如何在同一职业的行动者之间差异地分配不稳定性,并强调了职业不稳定性的交叉性质以及社会资本的背景性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Caste, Social Capital and Precarity of Labour Market Intermediaries: The case of Dalit labour contractors in India
Research on precarity predominantly adopts a monolithic view of labour market intermediaries and ignores the differential distribution of precarity based on social group membership. This omission not only hinders a nuanced understanding of precarity but also prevents our ability to address inequalities. To address this, we examined the influence of caste on differential experiences of precarity among labour contractors in the garment industry in Tamil Nadu, India. We find that unequal distribution of social capital along caste lines leads to Dalit labour contractors experiencing greater precarity than their upper caste counterparts and also being stuck in such precarity. Specifically, caste-based dynamics of social capital threaten the survival of Dalit labour contractors by distorting their economic wellbeing and destabilising their leadership, and hinder their upward occupational mobility by confining their spatial mobility, limiting resourceful connections, and thwarting growth opportunities. Our study shines new light on how societal inequalities differentially distribute precarity among actors in the same occupation and underscores the intersectional nature of occupational precarity as well as the contextual nature of social capital.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Organization Studies
Organization Studies MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: Organisation Studies (OS) aims to promote the understanding of organizations, organizing and the organized, and the social relevance of that understanding. It encourages the interplay between theorizing and empirical research, in the belief that they should be mutually informative. It is a multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal which is open to contributions of high quality, from any perspective relevant to the field and from any country. Organization Studies is, in particular, a supranational journal which gives special attention to national and cultural similarities and differences worldwide. This is reflected by its international editorial board and publisher and its collaboration with EGOS, the European Group for Organizational Studies. OS publishes papers that fully or partly draw on empirical data to make their contribution to organization theory and practice. Thus, OS welcomes work that in any form draws on empirical work to make strong theoretical and empirical contributions. If your paper is not drawing on empirical data in any form, we advise you to submit your work to Organization Theory – another journal under the auspices of the European Group for Organizational Studies (EGOS) – instead.
期刊最新文献
Media Review: The Untapped Power of Discovery Embodied Shame and Organization Studies Media Review: Extrapolations - A View from OS4F Media Review: The Value of Reputation Media Review: Reorganizing the world –Postcolonial Transitions and Navigating Nationalism in global business history
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1