2019年市政当局要求的医疗证明监管框架分析

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, LEGAL Medecine & Droit Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.1016/j.meddro.2022.01.002
Mehdi Aber , Yannick Ruelle
{"title":"2019年市政当局要求的医疗证明监管框架分析","authors":"Mehdi Aber ,&nbsp;Yannick Ruelle","doi":"10.1016/j.meddro.2022.01.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Medical certificates have a regular place in general medicine consultation. Since 2011, the french law has highlighted the absence of regulatory support of certain certificates, in particular of public services. The objective of this study was to find out which regulatory texts were based on the medical certificates required by a municipal administration, 8 years after the 2011 rationalization circular?</p></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><p>Qualitative study by observation and critical analysis of certificates by literature reviews according to the main PRISMA quality criteria (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes). The first step consisted of the exhaustive collection of the medical certificates provided by the municipality, for the citizens or the employees of the city. The origin of one of the municipal services was the only criterion for inclusion. The second stage consisted in analyzing the certificates according to the law by using databases classified depending on their level, taking their regulatory value into account as a priority. The research equations were constructed with an inductive process as the certificates were collected.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty-two certificates were collected and analyzed. Twenty-seven had regulatory support, two of which (not concerned in general medicine) complied with its content. No regulatory support was found for the 15 other certificates. The regulatory vagueness around sports accidents, or even the abuse of authority, are explanations for these certificates without existing or respected regulatory support.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The general practitioner is put in a difficult and ambivalent position. A major institutional commitment should be considered for the rationalization of medical certificates, in particular through medical education, health education for users and law enforcement.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":41275,"journal":{"name":"Medecine & Droit","volume":"2022 173","pages":"Pages 21-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyse du cadre réglementaire des certificats médicaux demandés par une municipalité en 2019\",\"authors\":\"Mehdi Aber ,&nbsp;Yannick Ruelle\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.meddro.2022.01.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Medical certificates have a regular place in general medicine consultation. Since 2011, the french law has highlighted the absence of regulatory support of certain certificates, in particular of public services. The objective of this study was to find out which regulatory texts were based on the medical certificates required by a municipal administration, 8 years after the 2011 rationalization circular?</p></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><p>Qualitative study by observation and critical analysis of certificates by literature reviews according to the main PRISMA quality criteria (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes). The first step consisted of the exhaustive collection of the medical certificates provided by the municipality, for the citizens or the employees of the city. The origin of one of the municipal services was the only criterion for inclusion. The second stage consisted in analyzing the certificates according to the law by using databases classified depending on their level, taking their regulatory value into account as a priority. The research equations were constructed with an inductive process as the certificates were collected.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty-two certificates were collected and analyzed. Twenty-seven had regulatory support, two of which (not concerned in general medicine) complied with its content. No regulatory support was found for the 15 other certificates. The regulatory vagueness around sports accidents, or even the abuse of authority, are explanations for these certificates without existing or respected regulatory support.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The general practitioner is put in a difficult and ambivalent position. A major institutional commitment should be considered for the rationalization of medical certificates, in particular through medical education, health education for users and law enforcement.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":41275,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medecine & Droit\",\"volume\":\"2022 173\",\"pages\":\"Pages 21-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medecine & Droit\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1246739122000185\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, LEGAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medecine & Droit","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1246739122000185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医学证明在普通医学咨询中占有固定的地位。自2011年以来,法国法律一直强调缺乏对某些证书的监管支持,特别是公共服务证书。本研究的目的是找出哪些监管文本是基于2011年合理化通知8年后市政管理部门要求的医疗证明?材料和方法根据PRISMA主要质量标准(系统评价和元分析的首选报告项目)对文献综述证书进行观察和批判性分析的定性研究。第一步是详尽收集市政当局为该市公民或雇员提供的医疗证明。其中一项市政服务的来源是列入的唯一标准。第二阶段是利用按级别分类的数据库依法分析证书,优先考虑其监管价值。在收集证据的同时,用归纳的方法构造了研究方程。结果共收集和分析了42份证书。27个得到了监管部门的支持,其中两个(与普通医学无关)符合其内容。其他15个证书没有得到监管部门的支持。围绕体育事故的监管模糊,甚至滥用权力,都是对这些证书的解释,没有现有的或受尊重的监管支持。结论全科医生处于困境和矛盾的境地。应考虑作出重大的机构承诺,使医疗证明合理化,特别是通过医学教育、对使用者的健康教育和执法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analyse du cadre réglementaire des certificats médicaux demandés par une municipalité en 2019

Medical certificates have a regular place in general medicine consultation. Since 2011, the french law has highlighted the absence of regulatory support of certain certificates, in particular of public services. The objective of this study was to find out which regulatory texts were based on the medical certificates required by a municipal administration, 8 years after the 2011 rationalization circular?

Material and method

Qualitative study by observation and critical analysis of certificates by literature reviews according to the main PRISMA quality criteria (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes). The first step consisted of the exhaustive collection of the medical certificates provided by the municipality, for the citizens or the employees of the city. The origin of one of the municipal services was the only criterion for inclusion. The second stage consisted in analyzing the certificates according to the law by using databases classified depending on their level, taking their regulatory value into account as a priority. The research equations were constructed with an inductive process as the certificates were collected.

Results

Forty-two certificates were collected and analyzed. Twenty-seven had regulatory support, two of which (not concerned in general medicine) complied with its content. No regulatory support was found for the 15 other certificates. The regulatory vagueness around sports accidents, or even the abuse of authority, are explanations for these certificates without existing or respected regulatory support.

Conclusion

The general practitioner is put in a difficult and ambivalent position. A major institutional commitment should be considered for the rationalization of medical certificates, in particular through medical education, health education for users and law enforcement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medecine & Droit
Medecine & Droit MEDICINE, LEGAL-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Scientific Committee of the journal Médecine et Droit includes professors of medicine, professors of law, magistrates, lawyers, court medical experts, and specialists in compensation for physical injury. Médecine et Droit provides: • rigorous and clear support for informative and educational matter • a tool for reflection and actualisation of knowledge • an essential link between doctors and lawyers. Médecine et Droit informs: • doctors on different aspects of law and regulations encountered in their profession • lawyers on the specific problems of the medical profession and important bio-ethical issues
期刊最新文献
Contents Contents Parcours de soins rénové, e-santé et maillage officinal : une réponse complexe à la pénurie de médecins Le concept de race : serpent de mer de la pratique médicale La loi du 10 mai 2024 contre les dérives sectaires : application dans le domaine de la santé : séparer le bon grain scientifique de l’ivraie charlatanesque
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1