面向大众的非法文学:虚幻与真实的读者

4区 文学 Q4 Arts and Humanities RUSSIAN STUDIES IN LITERATURE Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.1080/10611975.2020.2147380
J. Safronova
{"title":"面向大众的非法文学:虚幻与真实的读者","authors":"J. Safronova","doi":"10.1080/10611975.2020.2147380","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article is devoted to the illegal literature for the masses published in the 1870s by members of the populist movement known as the Narodniki. Here, we examine this literature as a product of imagination: guided by their own conceptions of the masses, the authors of illegal brochures wrote for readers they imagined to be incapable of comprehending serious scholarly writing and needing socialist ideas to be specially adapted for them. Such preconceptions of the mass reader existed within the context of a debate about literature for the masses involving not just liberal members of the intelligentsia, but also their ideological opponents, including government officials. The article’s second half examines how actual rather than the imagined readers reacted to the socialist literature that had been specially tailored to them. Unless there was a member of the intelligentsia to explain the meaning of these publications, they were unlikely to serve their purpose: they were handed over to children, priests, or rural authorities, or simply used to roll tobacco.","PeriodicalId":55621,"journal":{"name":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN LITERATURE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Illegal Literature for the Masses: The Imaginary and Real Reader\",\"authors\":\"J. Safronova\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10611975.2020.2147380\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This article is devoted to the illegal literature for the masses published in the 1870s by members of the populist movement known as the Narodniki. Here, we examine this literature as a product of imagination: guided by their own conceptions of the masses, the authors of illegal brochures wrote for readers they imagined to be incapable of comprehending serious scholarly writing and needing socialist ideas to be specially adapted for them. Such preconceptions of the mass reader existed within the context of a debate about literature for the masses involving not just liberal members of the intelligentsia, but also their ideological opponents, including government officials. The article’s second half examines how actual rather than the imagined readers reacted to the socialist literature that had been specially tailored to them. Unless there was a member of the intelligentsia to explain the meaning of these publications, they were unlikely to serve their purpose: they were handed over to children, priests, or rural authorities, or simply used to roll tobacco.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN LITERATURE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611975.2020.2147380\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSSIAN STUDIES IN LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10611975.2020.2147380","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章专门讨论19世纪70年代由民粹主义运动的民粹派成员出版的非法大众文学。在这里,我们把这些文献作为想象的产物来研究:在他们自己对大众的概念的指导下,非法小册子的作者为他们想象的无法理解严肃学术写作的读者写作,需要专门为他们改编社会主义思想。这种对大众读者的先入之见存在于一场关于大众文学的辩论中,这场辩论不仅涉及知识分子中的自由派成员,还涉及他们在意识形态上的对手,包括政府官员。文章的后半部分考察了实际的而不是想象中的读者对专门为他们量身定制的社会主义文学的反应。除非有知识分子来解释这些出版物的意义,否则它们不太可能达到它们的目的:它们被交给儿童、牧师或农村当局,或者只是用来卷烟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Illegal Literature for the Masses: The Imaginary and Real Reader
ABSTRACT This article is devoted to the illegal literature for the masses published in the 1870s by members of the populist movement known as the Narodniki. Here, we examine this literature as a product of imagination: guided by their own conceptions of the masses, the authors of illegal brochures wrote for readers they imagined to be incapable of comprehending serious scholarly writing and needing socialist ideas to be specially adapted for them. Such preconceptions of the mass reader existed within the context of a debate about literature for the masses involving not just liberal members of the intelligentsia, but also their ideological opponents, including government officials. The article’s second half examines how actual rather than the imagined readers reacted to the socialist literature that had been specially tailored to them. Unless there was a member of the intelligentsia to explain the meaning of these publications, they were unlikely to serve their purpose: they were handed over to children, priests, or rural authorities, or simply used to roll tobacco.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
RUSSIAN STUDIES IN LITERATURE
RUSSIAN STUDIES IN LITERATURE LITERATURE, SLAVIC-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Russian Studies in Literature publishes high-quality, annotated translations of Russian literary criticism and scholarship on contemporary works and popular cultural topics as well as the classics. Selections are drawn from the leading literary periodicals including Literaturnaia gazeta (Literary Gazette), Novoe literaturnoe obozrenie (New Literary Review), Oktiabr (October), Voprosy literatury (Problems of Literature), and Znamia (Banner). An editorial introduction to every issue provides context and insight that will be helpful for English-language readers.
期刊最新文献
Krylov and Many Others: The Genesis and Meaning of Russia’s First Literary Jubilee The Politics of Polyphony: Dangerous Modernity and the Structure of the Novel in Dostoevsky and Bakhtin Illegal Literature for the Masses: The Imaginary and Real Reader “The Truth Had Been Twisted and Contorted”: Toward a Pragmatics of F. M. Dostoevsky’s The Landlady Jakobson’s Hypothesis, Gleb / Ivanovich, and Perversion: G. Uspenskii’s Madness and His Short Story “Straightened”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1