开放式创新与西班牙初创企业与现有企业的比较

IF 0.5 Q4 BUSINESS UCJC Business and Society Review Pub Date : 2017-07-31 DOI:10.3232/UBR.2017.V14.N3.01

Elena M. Gimenez-Fernandez, Karin Beukel

{"title":"开放式创新与西班牙初创企业与现有企业的比较","authors":"Elena M. Gimenez-Fernandez, Karin Beukel","doi":"10.3232/UBR.2017.V14.N3.01","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study compares the open innovation strategy between startups and incumbent firms over a period of ten years (2004-2013). Using a sample of startups and incumbent Spanish firms, we find that they differ considerably, and that this has implications for management. Incumbent firms and startups differ in terms of their use of external cooperation activities as a source of innovation. The lack of financial and human resources of startups leads them to open their borders more than incumbent firms, and startups benefit from being flexible, as they have yet to implement routines. This boosts startups’ innovation performance.","PeriodicalId":40416,"journal":{"name":"UCJC Business and Society Review","volume":"1 1","pages":"18-33"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Open innovation and the comparison between startups and incumbent firms in Spain\",\"authors\":\"Elena M. Gimenez-Fernandez, Karin Beukel\",\"doi\":\"10.3232/UBR.2017.V14.N3.01\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study compares the open innovation strategy between startups and incumbent firms over a period of ten years (2004-2013). Using a sample of startups and incumbent Spanish firms, we find that they differ considerably, and that this has implications for management. Incumbent firms and startups differ in terms of their use of external cooperation activities as a source of innovation. The lack of financial and human resources of startups leads them to open their borders more than incumbent firms, and startups benefit from being flexible, as they have yet to implement routines. This boosts startups’ innovation performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UCJC Business and Society Review\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"18-33\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UCJC Business and Society Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3232/UBR.2017.V14.N3.01\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UCJC Business and Society Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3232/UBR.2017.V14.N3.01","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 11

摘要

本研究比较了2004-2013年十年间初创企业和老牌企业的开放式创新战略。通过对西班牙初创公司和现有公司的样本分析，我们发现它们存在很大差异，这对管理产生了影响。现有企业和初创企业在利用外部合作活动作为创新来源方面有所不同。由于缺乏资金和人力资源，初创公司比老牌公司更容易开放自己的边界，而初创公司也受益于灵活性，因为它们还没有执行常规。这提高了创业公司的创新绩效。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Open innovation and the comparison between startups and incumbent firms in Spain

This study compares the open innovation strategy between startups and incumbent firms over a period of ten years (2004-2013). Using a sample of startups and incumbent Spanish firms, we find that they differ considerably, and that this has implications for management. Incumbent firms and startups differ in terms of their use of external cooperation activities as a source of innovation. The lack of financial and human resources of startups leads them to open their borders more than incumbent firms, and startups benefit from being flexible, as they have yet to implement routines. This boosts startups’ innovation performance.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

UCJC Business and Society Review BUSINESS-

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

10 weeks

期刊介绍： UCJC Business & Society Review (UCJC BSR - ISSN 2659-3270) (formerly known as Universia Business Review) peer-reviewed and published quarterly, is committed to publishing scholarly empirical and theoretical research articles that have from an interdisciplinary approach a high impact on understanding the intersections of business, economy and society. UCJC BSR invites scholars and practitioners from every single domain in Social Sciences to share their analyses and perspectives to solve current, relevant and complex problems of our Societies and Economies such as Digital Transformation, Entrepreneurial Innovation Waves, Climate Change, Labor Migrations or Urban Concentrations among many others.