重新审视政治时代的健康信息:COVID - 19大流行的政治化及其对疫苗犹豫的有害影响

IF 2.5 3区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS Journal of Consumer Affairs Pub Date : 2023-07-28 DOI:10.1111/joca.12553
Ioannis Kareklas, Devipsita Bhattacharya, Darrel D. Muehling, Victoria Kisekka
{"title":"重新审视政治时代的健康信息:COVID - 19大流行的政治化及其对疫苗犹豫的有害影响","authors":"Ioannis Kareklas,&nbsp;Devipsita Bhattacharya,&nbsp;Darrel D. Muehling,&nbsp;Victoria Kisekka","doi":"10.1111/joca.12553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Our work investigates the extent to which the politicization of health science may have impacted consumers' vaccine hesitancy during the COVID-19 pandemic. This inter-disciplinary, multi-method manuscript reports the results of three empirical investigations designed to examine how the consumers' political leanings and the sources they rely on for information might influence their decisions to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. We explore how radically opposing viewpoints regarding the pandemic may have eroded public trust in government institutions and health science during the months leading up to the 2020 U.S. presidential election. In addition, we examine how consumers with opposing political leanings may be differentially influenced by promotional messages that represent the two dominant contrasting viewpoints regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. Importantly, we find that low vaccine-hesitant Trump voters can be successfully targeted for pro-vaccination interventions using highly credible spokespeople, perceived to have high levels of expertise and trustworthiness.</p>","PeriodicalId":47976,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Consumer Affairs","volume":"57 3","pages":"1120-1150"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reexamining health messages in the political age: The politicization of the COVID-19 pandemic and its detrimental effects on vaccine hesitancy\",\"authors\":\"Ioannis Kareklas,&nbsp;Devipsita Bhattacharya,&nbsp;Darrel D. Muehling,&nbsp;Victoria Kisekka\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/joca.12553\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Our work investigates the extent to which the politicization of health science may have impacted consumers' vaccine hesitancy during the COVID-19 pandemic. This inter-disciplinary, multi-method manuscript reports the results of three empirical investigations designed to examine how the consumers' political leanings and the sources they rely on for information might influence their decisions to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. We explore how radically opposing viewpoints regarding the pandemic may have eroded public trust in government institutions and health science during the months leading up to the 2020 U.S. presidential election. In addition, we examine how consumers with opposing political leanings may be differentially influenced by promotional messages that represent the two dominant contrasting viewpoints regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. Importantly, we find that low vaccine-hesitant Trump voters can be successfully targeted for pro-vaccination interventions using highly credible spokespeople, perceived to have high levels of expertise and trustworthiness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Consumer Affairs\",\"volume\":\"57 3\",\"pages\":\"1120-1150\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Consumer Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joca.12553\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Consumer Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joca.12553","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们的工作调查了在COVID-19大流行期间,卫生科学的政治化可能在多大程度上影响了消费者对疫苗的犹豫。这篇跨学科、多方法的论文报告了三项实证调查的结果,旨在研究消费者的政治倾向和他们依赖的信息来源如何影响他们接受COVID-19疫苗的决定。我们探讨了在2020年美国大选之前的几个月里,关于疫情的截然相反的观点是如何侵蚀了公众对政府机构和卫生科学的信任的总统选举。此外,我们还研究了政治倾向相反的消费者如何受到代表关于COVID-19大流行的两种主要对立观点的宣传信息的不同影响。重要的是,我们发现低疫苗犹豫的特朗普选民可以成功地针对使用高度可信的发言人进行支持疫苗接种的干预措施,这些发言人被认为具有高水平的专业知识和可信度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Reexamining health messages in the political age: The politicization of the COVID-19 pandemic and its detrimental effects on vaccine hesitancy

Our work investigates the extent to which the politicization of health science may have impacted consumers' vaccine hesitancy during the COVID-19 pandemic. This inter-disciplinary, multi-method manuscript reports the results of three empirical investigations designed to examine how the consumers' political leanings and the sources they rely on for information might influence their decisions to receive a COVID-19 vaccine. We explore how radically opposing viewpoints regarding the pandemic may have eroded public trust in government institutions and health science during the months leading up to the 2020 U.S. presidential election. In addition, we examine how consumers with opposing political leanings may be differentially influenced by promotional messages that represent the two dominant contrasting viewpoints regarding the COVID-19 pandemic. Importantly, we find that low vaccine-hesitant Trump voters can be successfully targeted for pro-vaccination interventions using highly credible spokespeople, perceived to have high levels of expertise and trustworthiness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
17.90%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: The ISI impact score of Journal of Consumer Affairs now places it among the leading business journals and one of the top handful of marketing- related publications. The immediacy index score, showing how swiftly the published studies are cited or applied in other publications, places JCA seventh of those same 77 journals. More importantly, in these difficult economic times, JCA is the leading journal whose focus for over four decades has been on the interests of consumers in the marketplace. With the journal"s origins in the consumer movement and consumer protection concerns, the focus for papers in terms of both research questions and implications must involve the consumer"s interest and topics must be addressed from the consumers point of view.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information The effect size and nonlinearity of the relationship between cannabis consumption and consumer self‐perceived mental health: A study based on eight national surveys in Canada How information processing style and vaccine pace development messaging influence vaccine acceptance: A mixed methods exploration In Memoriam: Monroe P. Friedman How different religiosity facets affect materialism, hedonistic shopping values, and compulsive buying: Toward mediation‐moderation effects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1