用于人类识别目的的二维和三维人脸图像线性度量的比较分析:一项初步研究

Q3 Dentistry Journal of Orofacial Sciences Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jofs.jofs_289_20
P. Pinto, V. Jacometti, J. Pereira, Marco Silva, R. Silva
{"title":"用于人类识别目的的二维和三维人脸图像线性度量的比较分析:一项初步研究","authors":"P. Pinto, V. Jacometti, J. Pereira, Marco Silva, R. Silva","doi":"10.4103/jofs.jofs_289_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Photo-anthropometry is a method of facial image comparison that consists of taking measurements on images. The objective of this study was to verify if facial measurements obtained from a two-dimensional (2D) image can be applied for the purpose of human identification when compared with measurements obtained from a three-dimensional (3D) image. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional research, a convenience sample was formed by 3D and 2D images of 12 participants. In these images, 35 linear measurements were taken between landmarks. The 2D images were obtained in different angles and norms (left and right sides, and front sides), and the measures were categorized into vertical, lateral, and lip regions. The data were organized in Excel® spreadsheets (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, Washington, USA) and submitted to descriptive statistics. Results: The vertical measurements in lateral norms were more divergent than the measurements of 3D images, whereas the measurements of the lip region showed less differences in all norms. In the lateral norms, vertical measures such as nasion–pogonion were underestimated by 14.35 mm, whereas this same measure was overestimated by 7.20 mm in the frontal norm. In the lip region, the most underestimated measures were crista philtri (left)–cheilion (left) at 5.95 mm and crista philtri (right)–cheilion (right) at 5.45 mm, and the most overestimated was cheilion (right)–cheilion (left) at 4.38 mm, all in the frontal norm. Conclusion: The facial measurements obtained in 2D images can be underestimated or overestimated depending on the angle and norm of each image.","PeriodicalId":16651,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orofacial Sciences","volume":"13 1","pages":"19 - 27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis between Linear Measures from Bidimensional and Three-dimensional Images of the Face for Human Identification Purpose: A Pilot Study\",\"authors\":\"P. Pinto, V. Jacometti, J. Pereira, Marco Silva, R. Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jofs.jofs_289_20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Photo-anthropometry is a method of facial image comparison that consists of taking measurements on images. The objective of this study was to verify if facial measurements obtained from a two-dimensional (2D) image can be applied for the purpose of human identification when compared with measurements obtained from a three-dimensional (3D) image. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional research, a convenience sample was formed by 3D and 2D images of 12 participants. In these images, 35 linear measurements were taken between landmarks. The 2D images were obtained in different angles and norms (left and right sides, and front sides), and the measures were categorized into vertical, lateral, and lip regions. The data were organized in Excel® spreadsheets (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, Washington, USA) and submitted to descriptive statistics. Results: The vertical measurements in lateral norms were more divergent than the measurements of 3D images, whereas the measurements of the lip region showed less differences in all norms. In the lateral norms, vertical measures such as nasion–pogonion were underestimated by 14.35 mm, whereas this same measure was overestimated by 7.20 mm in the frontal norm. In the lip region, the most underestimated measures were crista philtri (left)–cheilion (left) at 5.95 mm and crista philtri (right)–cheilion (right) at 5.45 mm, and the most overestimated was cheilion (right)–cheilion (left) at 4.38 mm, all in the frontal norm. Conclusion: The facial measurements obtained in 2D images can be underestimated or overestimated depending on the angle and norm of each image.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16651,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orofacial Sciences\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"19 - 27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orofacial Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jofs.jofs_289_20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Dentistry\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orofacial Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jofs.jofs_289_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:照片人体测量是一种面部图像比较方法,包括对图像进行测量。本研究的目的是验证与从三维(3D)图像获得的测量结果相比,从二维(2D)图像中获得的面部测量结果是否可以用于人类识别。材料和方法:在这项横断面研究中,12名参与者的3D和2D图像形成了一个方便的样本。在这些图像中,在地标之间进行了35次线性测量。2D图像是在不同的角度和规范(左侧、右侧和前侧)下获得的,测量分为垂直、横向和唇部区域。数据被组织在Excel®电子表格中(微软公司,美国华盛顿州雷德蒙德),并提交给描述性统计数据。结果:侧模的垂直测量结果比3D图像的测量结果更具差异性,而唇部的测量结果在所有规范中的差异较小。在侧位规范中,鼻骨-前角等垂直测量被低估了14.35 毫米,而同样的测量值被高估了7.20 mm。在嘴唇区域,最被低估的测量值是嵴(左)-cheilion(左),为5.95 mm和腓嵴(右)-cheilion(右)5.45 mm,而被高估最多的是cheilion(右)–cheilion 毫米,都在正面标准。结论:根据每张图像的角度和范数,在2D图像中获得的面部测量可能被低估或高估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative Analysis between Linear Measures from Bidimensional and Three-dimensional Images of the Face for Human Identification Purpose: A Pilot Study
Introduction: Photo-anthropometry is a method of facial image comparison that consists of taking measurements on images. The objective of this study was to verify if facial measurements obtained from a two-dimensional (2D) image can be applied for the purpose of human identification when compared with measurements obtained from a three-dimensional (3D) image. Materials and Methods: In this cross-sectional research, a convenience sample was formed by 3D and 2D images of 12 participants. In these images, 35 linear measurements were taken between landmarks. The 2D images were obtained in different angles and norms (left and right sides, and front sides), and the measures were categorized into vertical, lateral, and lip regions. The data were organized in Excel® spreadsheets (Microsoft Corp., Redmond, Washington, USA) and submitted to descriptive statistics. Results: The vertical measurements in lateral norms were more divergent than the measurements of 3D images, whereas the measurements of the lip region showed less differences in all norms. In the lateral norms, vertical measures such as nasion–pogonion were underestimated by 14.35 mm, whereas this same measure was overestimated by 7.20 mm in the frontal norm. In the lip region, the most underestimated measures were crista philtri (left)–cheilion (left) at 5.95 mm and crista philtri (right)–cheilion (right) at 5.45 mm, and the most overestimated was cheilion (right)–cheilion (left) at 4.38 mm, all in the frontal norm. Conclusion: The facial measurements obtained in 2D images can be underestimated or overestimated depending on the angle and norm of each image.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Orofacial Sciences
Journal of Orofacial Sciences Dentistry-Orthodontics
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
31 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Orofacial Sciences is dedicated to noblest profession of Dentistry, and to the young & blossoming intellects of dentistry, with whom the future of dentistry will be cherished better. The prime aim of this journal is to advance the science and art of dentistry. This journal is an educational tool to encourage and share the acquired knowledge with our peers. It also to improves the standards and quality of therauptic methods. This journal assures you to gain knowledge in recent advances and research activities. The journal publishes original scientific papers with special emphasis on research, unusual case reports, editorial, review articles, book reviews & other relevant information in context of high professional standards.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation of Bromelain, A Pineapple Extract as a Bleaching Agent on Human Enamel and Determining its Concentration by Reverse-HPLC Method Comparative evaluation of antibacterial efficacy of chlorhexidine mouthwash and Momordica charantia, Spinacia oleracea mouthwash against Streptococcus mutans, Lactobacillus spp., and Porphyromonas gingivalis − An in vitro study Identification of heterochromatic variations in nonsyndromic cleft lip and palate Effect of light-curing silver diamine fluoride on microtensile bond strength of primary carious dentin restored with glass ionomer cement: In vitro study Conference Proceedings 6th Malaysian International Dental show
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1