印刷品不均匀性评价方法的比较研究及其与人类视觉系统的相关性

IF 2 4区 工程技术 Q3 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED Coloration Technology Pub Date : 2023-06-14 DOI:10.1111/cote.12708
Ivana Jurič, Sunčica Zdravković, Nemanja Kašiković, Sandra Dedijer, Magdolna Pal, Živko Pavlović, Igor Karlovits
{"title":"印刷品不均匀性评价方法的比较研究及其与人类视觉系统的相关性","authors":"Ivana Jurič,&nbsp;Sunčica Zdravković,&nbsp;Nemanja Kašiković,&nbsp;Sandra Dedijer,&nbsp;Magdolna Pal,&nbsp;Živko Pavlović,&nbsp;Igor Karlovits","doi":"10.1111/cote.12708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Print nonuniformity is the variation of optical density (reflection) on the print and can occur in several different types that can be classified into two basic groups: random and systematic variations. This article examines two types from each group of variations that are most commonly found in digital printing systems: blotches and streaks, where amplitude and size were varied. Three most commonly used methods for measuring the print nonuniformity were used: Grey Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM), ISO 13660 and Integration (also Improved Integration) method. The results obtained by measuring were compared with a visual assessment to find the link between objective and subjective analysis and to define and determine which method/parameter is the best for the measurement of which type of print (non)uniformity. The obtained results indicate the possibility of selecting the measurement parameter, but that the choice of the parameter depends on the type of nonuniformity. It is concluded that in the case of the GLCM method, the entropy and energy parameters are strongly related to the visual assessment for all three sets of samples. These parameters can be used regardless of the type of nonuniformity. The ISO G parameter can be used to measure both graininess and mottling, while the ISO M parameter is only suitable for measuring mottling. Integration method could be used to measure systematic error. On the basis of conclusions of the research, it is possible to propose the development of an industrially applicable solution for measuring print nonuniformity of digitally printed samples.</p>","PeriodicalId":10502,"journal":{"name":"Coloration Technology","volume":"140 2","pages":"239-251"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of different methods for the assessment of print nonuniformity and their correlation with the human visual system\",\"authors\":\"Ivana Jurič,&nbsp;Sunčica Zdravković,&nbsp;Nemanja Kašiković,&nbsp;Sandra Dedijer,&nbsp;Magdolna Pal,&nbsp;Živko Pavlović,&nbsp;Igor Karlovits\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cote.12708\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Print nonuniformity is the variation of optical density (reflection) on the print and can occur in several different types that can be classified into two basic groups: random and systematic variations. This article examines two types from each group of variations that are most commonly found in digital printing systems: blotches and streaks, where amplitude and size were varied. Three most commonly used methods for measuring the print nonuniformity were used: Grey Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM), ISO 13660 and Integration (also Improved Integration) method. The results obtained by measuring were compared with a visual assessment to find the link between objective and subjective analysis and to define and determine which method/parameter is the best for the measurement of which type of print (non)uniformity. The obtained results indicate the possibility of selecting the measurement parameter, but that the choice of the parameter depends on the type of nonuniformity. It is concluded that in the case of the GLCM method, the entropy and energy parameters are strongly related to the visual assessment for all three sets of samples. These parameters can be used regardless of the type of nonuniformity. The ISO G parameter can be used to measure both graininess and mottling, while the ISO M parameter is only suitable for measuring mottling. Integration method could be used to measure systematic error. On the basis of conclusions of the research, it is possible to propose the development of an industrially applicable solution for measuring print nonuniformity of digitally printed samples.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Coloration Technology\",\"volume\":\"140 2\",\"pages\":\"239-251\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Coloration Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cote.12708\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Coloration Technology","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cote.12708","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

印刷品的不均匀性是指印刷品上光学密度(反射)的变化,可分为几种不同的类型:随机变化和系统变化。本文探讨了数字印刷系统中最常见的两类变化:斑点和条纹,其中斑点和条纹的振幅和大小都是不同的。本文采用了三种最常用的方法来测量印刷品的不均匀性:灰度共现矩阵 (GLCM)、ISO 13660 和积分法(也称改进积分法)。将测量结果与目测评估结果进行比较,以找出客观分析与主观分析之间的联系,并定义和确定哪种方法/参数最适合测量哪种类型的印刷品(不)均匀性。结果表明,可以选择测量参数,但参数的选择取决于不均匀性的类型。结论是,就 GLCM 方法而言,熵参数和能量参数与所有三组样本的视觉评估密切相关。这些参数可用于任何类型的不均匀性。ISO G 参数可用于测量纹理和斑驳,而 ISO M 参数仅适用于测量斑驳。积分法可用于测量系统误差。在研究结论的基础上,我们可以提出一种适用于工业的解决方案,用于测量数字印刷样品的印刷不均匀性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative study of different methods for the assessment of print nonuniformity and their correlation with the human visual system

Print nonuniformity is the variation of optical density (reflection) on the print and can occur in several different types that can be classified into two basic groups: random and systematic variations. This article examines two types from each group of variations that are most commonly found in digital printing systems: blotches and streaks, where amplitude and size were varied. Three most commonly used methods for measuring the print nonuniformity were used: Grey Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM), ISO 13660 and Integration (also Improved Integration) method. The results obtained by measuring were compared with a visual assessment to find the link between objective and subjective analysis and to define and determine which method/parameter is the best for the measurement of which type of print (non)uniformity. The obtained results indicate the possibility of selecting the measurement parameter, but that the choice of the parameter depends on the type of nonuniformity. It is concluded that in the case of the GLCM method, the entropy and energy parameters are strongly related to the visual assessment for all three sets of samples. These parameters can be used regardless of the type of nonuniformity. The ISO G parameter can be used to measure both graininess and mottling, while the ISO M parameter is only suitable for measuring mottling. Integration method could be used to measure systematic error. On the basis of conclusions of the research, it is possible to propose the development of an industrially applicable solution for measuring print nonuniformity of digitally printed samples.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Coloration Technology
Coloration Technology 工程技术-材料科学:纺织
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
67
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The primary mission of Coloration Technology is to promote innovation and fundamental understanding in the science and technology of coloured materials by providing a medium for communication of peer-reviewed research papers of the highest quality. It is internationally recognised as a vehicle for the publication of theoretical and technological papers on the subjects allied to all aspects of coloration. Regular sections in the journal include reviews, original research and reports, feature articles, short communications and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Investigation of the application angle and mode parameters on colour fading obtained in laser process Effect of chromophore type on efficiency of reactive dye removal using polyamidoamine dendrimer Preparation and characterisation of pH‐responsive indicator ink for pork freshness monitoring
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1