导师模式:对实习环境下特殊教育职前教师的启示或约束?

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Teacher Development Pub Date : 2022-08-08 DOI:10.1080/13664530.2022.2105939
Elizabeth A. Cutrer-Párraga, Kendra M. Hall-Kenyon, E. Miller, Morgan Christensen, Jessi Collins, Emily W. Reed, Tyler Beer
{"title":"导师模式:对实习环境下特殊教育职前教师的启示或约束?","authors":"Elizabeth A. Cutrer-Párraga, Kendra M. Hall-Kenyon, E. Miller, Morgan Christensen, Jessi Collins, Emily W. Reed, Tyler Beer","doi":"10.1080/13664530.2022.2105939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Special education (SPED) teacher preparation programs are intended to help preservice teachers (PSTs) learn and adopt effective teaching practices to serve students with special needs. To help SPED-PSTs learn needed skills, SPED mentor teachers (MTs) must employ high-leverage practices (HLPs) such as performance feedback, conferencing, and modeling. Although most teacher preparation programs utilize modeling in preparing PSTs, little is known about how SPED-MTs use this mentoring tool. An interpretative phenomenological analysis was conducted to explore how SPED-MTs engaged PSTs in modeling practices during a practicum experience. Data from semi-structured interviews were analyzed to describe SPED-PST and SPED-MT attitudes, experiences, and use of modeling over the course of a special education practicum, focusing on MTs’ modeling strategies and PSTs’ subsequent behaviors. The relative impacts of simple and cognitive modeling on the PST-MT relationship were compared. SPED-MTs’ modeling foci were compared to recommended HLPs. This preliminary study provides recommendations for SPED-MTs’ use of modeling with SPED-PSTs.","PeriodicalId":46208,"journal":{"name":"Teacher Development","volume":"26 1","pages":"587 - 605"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mentor teachers modeling: affordance or constraint for special education pre-service teachers in the practicum setting?\",\"authors\":\"Elizabeth A. Cutrer-Párraga, Kendra M. Hall-Kenyon, E. Miller, Morgan Christensen, Jessi Collins, Emily W. Reed, Tyler Beer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13664530.2022.2105939\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Special education (SPED) teacher preparation programs are intended to help preservice teachers (PSTs) learn and adopt effective teaching practices to serve students with special needs. To help SPED-PSTs learn needed skills, SPED mentor teachers (MTs) must employ high-leverage practices (HLPs) such as performance feedback, conferencing, and modeling. Although most teacher preparation programs utilize modeling in preparing PSTs, little is known about how SPED-MTs use this mentoring tool. An interpretative phenomenological analysis was conducted to explore how SPED-MTs engaged PSTs in modeling practices during a practicum experience. Data from semi-structured interviews were analyzed to describe SPED-PST and SPED-MT attitudes, experiences, and use of modeling over the course of a special education practicum, focusing on MTs’ modeling strategies and PSTs’ subsequent behaviors. The relative impacts of simple and cognitive modeling on the PST-MT relationship were compared. SPED-MTs’ modeling foci were compared to recommended HLPs. This preliminary study provides recommendations for SPED-MTs’ use of modeling with SPED-PSTs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46208,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teacher Development\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"587 - 605\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teacher Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2022.2105939\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teacher Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2022.2105939","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

特殊教育(SPED)教师培训项目旨在帮助职前教师学习并采用有效的教学实践来服务有特殊需求的学生。为了帮助SPED- pst学习所需的技能,SPED导师教师(mt)必须采用高杠杆实践(hlp),例如绩效反馈、会议和建模。尽管大多数教师培训项目都利用建模来准备pst,但人们对speed - mt如何使用这种指导工具知之甚少。一项解释性现象学分析被用于探索在实习经历中,speed - mts如何让PSTs参与建模实践。我们分析了半结构化访谈的数据,以描述特殊教育实习过程中speed - pst和speed - mt的态度、经验和建模的使用,重点关注mt的建模策略和pst的后续行为。比较简单模型和认知模型对PST-MT关系的相对影响。将speed - mt的建模病灶与推荐的hlp进行比较。这项初步研究为speed - mts使用speed - psts建模提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mentor teachers modeling: affordance or constraint for special education pre-service teachers in the practicum setting?
ABSTRACT Special education (SPED) teacher preparation programs are intended to help preservice teachers (PSTs) learn and adopt effective teaching practices to serve students with special needs. To help SPED-PSTs learn needed skills, SPED mentor teachers (MTs) must employ high-leverage practices (HLPs) such as performance feedback, conferencing, and modeling. Although most teacher preparation programs utilize modeling in preparing PSTs, little is known about how SPED-MTs use this mentoring tool. An interpretative phenomenological analysis was conducted to explore how SPED-MTs engaged PSTs in modeling practices during a practicum experience. Data from semi-structured interviews were analyzed to describe SPED-PST and SPED-MT attitudes, experiences, and use of modeling over the course of a special education practicum, focusing on MTs’ modeling strategies and PSTs’ subsequent behaviors. The relative impacts of simple and cognitive modeling on the PST-MT relationship were compared. SPED-MTs’ modeling foci were compared to recommended HLPs. This preliminary study provides recommendations for SPED-MTs’ use of modeling with SPED-PSTs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Teacher Development
Teacher Development EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
33
期刊介绍: Teacher Development is a fully refereed international journal publishing articles on all aspects of teachers" professional development. It acts as a forum for critical and reflective attention to practice in teacher development and aims thereby to contribute to the quality of professional development. The journal takes a "whole-career" view of teacher development, and work from both international and inter-professional perspectives is welcome. Articles may deal with teacher development in varying political and professional contexts, and may be in a variety of styles, in keeping with the diversity of activity in professional development.
期刊最新文献
Teacher-tailored student evaluation of teaching as a formative lens for reflection on teaching: academics’ perspectives Navigating formative assessment as professional development in digital contexts: insights from teachers’ experiences Nature-based teacher education as beyond ‘getting outside:’ relational attunement, attending to the un-noticed, and ethical responsibility Exploring the varying agendas of principals, teachers, and a university related to mentorship Guided attention strategies for developing teacher sight
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1