敏捷还是传统的项目组织:对各地区企业决策标准的定量评估

IF 1.6 Q3 BUSINESS Central European Business Review Pub Date : 2022-05-11 DOI:10.18267/j.cebr.308
Nuria Magdalena Maier, Philipp Emmerich
{"title":"敏捷还是传统的项目组织:对各地区企业决策标准的定量评估","authors":"Nuria Magdalena Maier, Philipp Emmerich","doi":"10.18267/j.cebr.308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The so-called agile approach is increasingly popular in the world of project management as a response to more dynamic and competitive environments. This study follows the question: What are the decisive criteria that result in the use of agile process models in practice? Therefore, a broad range of decision criteria is investigated, representing different reasons for firms to decide in favour or against the usage of agile process models, namely: Time-saving, increased efficiency, availability of qualified personnel, uniform terminology, project comparability and functions as a knowledge base. Most existing research on agile project management is of qualitative nature; this study uses a quantitative approach to assessing 51 firms and nine different industries within the DACH region. The collected data was analysed in a binary logistic regression model. Results reveal that time-saving positively predicts the use of agile process models, while high ratings in function as a knowledge base and project comparability predict the absence of agile process models. Therefore, practitioners are suggested to educate project and portfolio managers in the creation of hybrid environments and integration of agile process models in traditional project portfolios. Implications for Central European audience : The results of this study provide valuable insights into the selection of project management approaches across different industries in the DACH region. industry and x 8 = firm size, are added to the model, with industry designed as a categorical variable with the dimensions IT and “Other”. The analysis was carried out with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS Version 27). The Wald statistics and the p-values are considered to assess whether the suggested causalities result in significant correlations in the model. For this study, a p-value of p < 0.05 is considered significant. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test is applied to determine the overall quality of the model (goodness-of-fit), providing information to what degree the estimated model fits the data sample, dividing the observations into groups and comparing the predicted observations with the actual observations for each group. Based on this comparison, the Chi-square test is then carried out. The result showed significance (p<0.05), indicating that there is a significant deviation between the model and the data. The odds ratio (Exp(ß)) is considered to assess the effect strength of the respective predictor variables. The odds ratio gives the change in the probability of the event Y=1, if one independent variable is increased by one unit, given that all the other variables of the model are held constant. For negative odds ratios, the reciprocal value is calculated.","PeriodicalId":37276,"journal":{"name":"Central European Business Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agile or Traditional Project Organization: A Quantitative Assessment of Decision Criteria among Firms in the Dach Region\",\"authors\":\"Nuria Magdalena Maier, Philipp Emmerich\",\"doi\":\"10.18267/j.cebr.308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The so-called agile approach is increasingly popular in the world of project management as a response to more dynamic and competitive environments. This study follows the question: What are the decisive criteria that result in the use of agile process models in practice? Therefore, a broad range of decision criteria is investigated, representing different reasons for firms to decide in favour or against the usage of agile process models, namely: Time-saving, increased efficiency, availability of qualified personnel, uniform terminology, project comparability and functions as a knowledge base. Most existing research on agile project management is of qualitative nature; this study uses a quantitative approach to assessing 51 firms and nine different industries within the DACH region. The collected data was analysed in a binary logistic regression model. Results reveal that time-saving positively predicts the use of agile process models, while high ratings in function as a knowledge base and project comparability predict the absence of agile process models. Therefore, practitioners are suggested to educate project and portfolio managers in the creation of hybrid environments and integration of agile process models in traditional project portfolios. Implications for Central European audience : The results of this study provide valuable insights into the selection of project management approaches across different industries in the DACH region. industry and x 8 = firm size, are added to the model, with industry designed as a categorical variable with the dimensions IT and “Other”. The analysis was carried out with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS Version 27). The Wald statistics and the p-values are considered to assess whether the suggested causalities result in significant correlations in the model. For this study, a p-value of p < 0.05 is considered significant. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test is applied to determine the overall quality of the model (goodness-of-fit), providing information to what degree the estimated model fits the data sample, dividing the observations into groups and comparing the predicted observations with the actual observations for each group. Based on this comparison, the Chi-square test is then carried out. The result showed significance (p<0.05), indicating that there is a significant deviation between the model and the data. The odds ratio (Exp(ß)) is considered to assess the effect strength of the respective predictor variables. The odds ratio gives the change in the probability of the event Y=1, if one independent variable is increased by one unit, given that all the other variables of the model are held constant. For negative odds ratios, the reciprocal value is calculated.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central European Business Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central European Business Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.308\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Business Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18267/j.cebr.308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

所谓的敏捷方法在项目管理领域越来越流行,作为对更动态和竞争环境的响应。本研究遵循以下问题:在实践中使用敏捷过程模型的决定性标准是什么?因此,研究了广泛的决策标准,代表了公司决定支持或反对使用敏捷过程模型的不同原因,即:节省时间,提高效率,合格人员的可用性,统一的术语,项目可比性和作为知识库的功能。现有的敏捷项目管理研究大多是定性的;本研究采用定量方法对DACH地区的51家公司和9个不同行业进行了评估。收集的数据在二元逻辑回归模型中进行分析。结果表明,时间节约积极地预测了敏捷过程模型的使用,而作为知识库的功能和项目可比性的高评级则预测了敏捷过程模型的缺乏。因此,建议从业人员在创建混合环境和在传统项目组合中集成敏捷过程模型方面对项目和投资组合经理进行培训。对中欧受众的影响:本研究的结果为DACH地区不同行业的项目管理方法选择提供了有价值的见解。将行业和x8 =企业规模添加到模型中,将行业设计为具有IT和“其他”维度的分类变量。分析是用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS 27版)进行的。考虑Wald统计量和p值来评估所建议的因果关系是否导致模型中的显著相关性。在本研究中,p值< 0.05被认为是显著的。Hosmer-Lemeshow检验用于确定模型的整体质量(拟合优度),提供估计模型与数据样本拟合程度的信息,将观测值分成组,并将每组的预测观测值与实际观测值进行比较。基于这种比较,然后进行卡方检验。结果显示显著性(p<0.05),说明模型与数据存在显著偏差。比值比(Exp(ß))被用来评估各自预测变量的影响强度。如果一个自变量增加一个单位,假设模型的所有其他变量保持不变,那么比值比给出了事件Y=1的概率变化。对于负比值比,计算倒数值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Agile or Traditional Project Organization: A Quantitative Assessment of Decision Criteria among Firms in the Dach Region
The so-called agile approach is increasingly popular in the world of project management as a response to more dynamic and competitive environments. This study follows the question: What are the decisive criteria that result in the use of agile process models in practice? Therefore, a broad range of decision criteria is investigated, representing different reasons for firms to decide in favour or against the usage of agile process models, namely: Time-saving, increased efficiency, availability of qualified personnel, uniform terminology, project comparability and functions as a knowledge base. Most existing research on agile project management is of qualitative nature; this study uses a quantitative approach to assessing 51 firms and nine different industries within the DACH region. The collected data was analysed in a binary logistic regression model. Results reveal that time-saving positively predicts the use of agile process models, while high ratings in function as a knowledge base and project comparability predict the absence of agile process models. Therefore, practitioners are suggested to educate project and portfolio managers in the creation of hybrid environments and integration of agile process models in traditional project portfolios. Implications for Central European audience : The results of this study provide valuable insights into the selection of project management approaches across different industries in the DACH region. industry and x 8 = firm size, are added to the model, with industry designed as a categorical variable with the dimensions IT and “Other”. The analysis was carried out with the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS Version 27). The Wald statistics and the p-values are considered to assess whether the suggested causalities result in significant correlations in the model. For this study, a p-value of p < 0.05 is considered significant. The Hosmer-Lemeshow test is applied to determine the overall quality of the model (goodness-of-fit), providing information to what degree the estimated model fits the data sample, dividing the observations into groups and comparing the predicted observations with the actual observations for each group. Based on this comparison, the Chi-square test is then carried out. The result showed significance (p<0.05), indicating that there is a significant deviation between the model and the data. The odds ratio (Exp(ß)) is considered to assess the effect strength of the respective predictor variables. The odds ratio gives the change in the probability of the event Y=1, if one independent variable is increased by one unit, given that all the other variables of the model are held constant. For negative odds ratios, the reciprocal value is calculated.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Central European Business Review
Central European Business Review Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Social Media Word of Mouth and Masstige Purchase Behaviour Do Global Disruptive Events Induce Herding Behaviour during Upward and Downward Market Movements? The Evidence from Nordic and Baltic Stock Markets Data Analysis in Demand Forecasting: A Case Study of Poetry Book Sales in the European Area Identifying Positioning Axes for Building Brand Equity in Cork Fashion Products Dynamic Panel Estimation of the Deaton Paradox
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1