当你什么都没说的时候:从警察局嫌疑人的沉默中推断

IF 0.7 2区 社会学 Q2 LAW International Journal of Evidence & Proof Pub Date : 2022-06-10 DOI:10.1177/13657127221104649
Y. Daly, C. Dowd, Aimee Muirhead
{"title":"当你什么都没说的时候:从警察局嫌疑人的沉默中推断","authors":"Y. Daly, C. Dowd, Aimee Muirhead","doi":"10.1177/13657127221104649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Drawing on qualitative research with criminal justice professionals, this article explores the practical operation of provisions allowing for inferences to be drawn from silence at the point of police questioning in Ireland. The article examines (1) pre-interview disclosure and the timing of the invocation of inferences within the detention period; (2) the manner in which suspects are informed about the possible consequences of any failure to answer questions or mention certain facts; and, (3) the value and impact of inferences at trial. Findings include the need to reconsider the late disclosure approach adopted to police interrogation in Ireland, while maintaining separate inference interviews; difficulties with the current ‘ordinary language’ examples used to explain inference provisions to suspects; and, a notable distinction between the use of inferences in particular courts in the Irish criminal process.","PeriodicalId":54168,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Evidence & Proof","volume":"26 1","pages":"249 - 270"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When you say nothing at all: Invoking inferences from suspect silence in the police station\",\"authors\":\"Y. Daly, C. Dowd, Aimee Muirhead\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/13657127221104649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Drawing on qualitative research with criminal justice professionals, this article explores the practical operation of provisions allowing for inferences to be drawn from silence at the point of police questioning in Ireland. The article examines (1) pre-interview disclosure and the timing of the invocation of inferences within the detention period; (2) the manner in which suspects are informed about the possible consequences of any failure to answer questions or mention certain facts; and, (3) the value and impact of inferences at trial. Findings include the need to reconsider the late disclosure approach adopted to police interrogation in Ireland, while maintaining separate inference interviews; difficulties with the current ‘ordinary language’ examples used to explain inference provisions to suspects; and, a notable distinction between the use of inferences in particular courts in the Irish criminal process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54168,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Evidence & Proof\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"249 - 270\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Evidence & Proof\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/13657127221104649\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Evidence & Proof","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13657127221104649","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

根据对刑事司法专业人员的定性研究,本文探讨了允许在爱尔兰警方询问时从沉默中得出推论的条款的实际操作。这篇文章探讨了(1)面谈前的披露和在拘留期内援引推论的时间;(2) 向嫌疑人告知未回答问题或未提及某些事实可能造成的后果的方式;以及(3)推论在审判中的价值和影响。调查结果包括需要重新考虑爱尔兰警方审讯采用的迟披露方法,同时保持单独的推理访谈;目前用于向嫌疑人解释推理条款的“普通语言”示例存在困难;以及,在爱尔兰刑事诉讼中,在特定法院使用推论之间的显著区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
When you say nothing at all: Invoking inferences from suspect silence in the police station
Drawing on qualitative research with criminal justice professionals, this article explores the practical operation of provisions allowing for inferences to be drawn from silence at the point of police questioning in Ireland. The article examines (1) pre-interview disclosure and the timing of the invocation of inferences within the detention period; (2) the manner in which suspects are informed about the possible consequences of any failure to answer questions or mention certain facts; and, (3) the value and impact of inferences at trial. Findings include the need to reconsider the late disclosure approach adopted to police interrogation in Ireland, while maintaining separate inference interviews; difficulties with the current ‘ordinary language’ examples used to explain inference provisions to suspects; and, a notable distinction between the use of inferences in particular courts in the Irish criminal process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
15
期刊最新文献
Preponderance, proportionality, stepwise liability Stepwise liability: Between the preponderance rule and proportional liability The skewing effect of outcome evidence The economic case for conviction multiplicity What matters for assessing insider witnesses? Results of an experimental vignette study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1