现代民事诉讼中合意原则的实施:欧洲法院友好争端解决程序的做法

{"title":"现代民事诉讼中合意原则的实施:欧洲法院友好争端解决程序的做法","authors":"","doi":"10.33327/ajee-18-6.1-a000124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This article explores the global changes in the orientation of civil procedure from competitive and adversarial towards more cooperative and consensual models. It aims to identify the reflection of mentioned tendencies in the valid legal regulation and practice of modern civil procedure. The consensual tenet in the civil process is analysed from the perspective of civil procedure goals, settlement principle, and case management as an effective tool for implementing the latter in practice. The authors explore the court-related amicable dispute resolution procedures to see the similarities and differences.\nMethods: Research commenced with a review of the existing scientific literature, a brief historical analysis, and a document analysis concerning changes in civil procedure orientation towards less competitive and more cooperation-grounded resolution of civil disputes. This research was followed by the comparative study of court-related amicable dispute resolution procedures with examples in particular legal jurisdictions like Austria, Lithuania, and Ukraine.\nResults and Conclusions: Vital changes in the perception of civil procedure regarding the widely accepted need to foster settlements in civil disputes, and an analysis of the most commonly used procedures as court conciliation and court mediation, were presented in this paper. The authors distinguish and analyse three court-related amicable dispute resolution procedures – conciliation, mediation, and the amicable conciliation process, emphasising their peculiarities and features. This research assists dispute resolution practitioners and researchers interested in better understanding how different court-related amicable dispute resolution procedures can be implemented in legal regulation and practice.","PeriodicalId":40329,"journal":{"name":"Access to Justice in Eastern Europe","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The implementation of consensual tenet in modern civil procedure: A European approach of court-related amicable dispute resolution procedures\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.33327/ajee-18-6.1-a000124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: This article explores the global changes in the orientation of civil procedure from competitive and adversarial towards more cooperative and consensual models. It aims to identify the reflection of mentioned tendencies in the valid legal regulation and practice of modern civil procedure. The consensual tenet in the civil process is analysed from the perspective of civil procedure goals, settlement principle, and case management as an effective tool for implementing the latter in practice. The authors explore the court-related amicable dispute resolution procedures to see the similarities and differences.\\nMethods: Research commenced with a review of the existing scientific literature, a brief historical analysis, and a document analysis concerning changes in civil procedure orientation towards less competitive and more cooperation-grounded resolution of civil disputes. This research was followed by the comparative study of court-related amicable dispute resolution procedures with examples in particular legal jurisdictions like Austria, Lithuania, and Ukraine.\\nResults and Conclusions: Vital changes in the perception of civil procedure regarding the widely accepted need to foster settlements in civil disputes, and an analysis of the most commonly used procedures as court conciliation and court mediation, were presented in this paper. The authors distinguish and analyse three court-related amicable dispute resolution procedures – conciliation, mediation, and the amicable conciliation process, emphasising their peculiarities and features. This research assists dispute resolution practitioners and researchers interested in better understanding how different court-related amicable dispute resolution procedures can be implemented in legal regulation and practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Access to Justice in Eastern Europe\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Access to Justice in Eastern Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33327/ajee-18-6.1-a000124\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Access to Justice in Eastern Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33327/ajee-18-6.1-a000124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:本文探讨了全球民事诉讼取向的变化,从竞争和对抗模式向更多的合作和共识模式。旨在找出上述倾向在现代民事诉讼的有效法律规制和实践中的反映。本文从民事诉讼目标、和解原则以及作为实践中落实和解原则的有效工具的案件管理等方面对民事诉讼中的协商一致原则进行了分析。笔者对法院相关的友好纠纷解决程序进行了探讨,以了解其异同。方法:研究首先回顾了现有的科学文献,进行了简要的历史分析,并对民事诉讼程序的变化进行了文件分析,以减少竞争,更多地以合作为基础解决民事纠纷。这项研究之后,以奥地利、立陶宛和乌克兰等特定司法管辖区为例,对法院相关的友好争议解决程序进行了比较研究。结果和结论:在广泛接受的民事纠纷解决需要方面,民事诉讼程序观念发生了重大变化,并对法院调解和法院调解等最常用程序进行了分析。作者区分和分析了与法院有关的三种友好争议解决程序——调解、调解和友好调解程序,强调了它们的特点和特点。本研究有助于争议解决从业者和有兴趣的研究者更好地理解不同法院相关的友好争议解决程序如何在法律法规和实践中实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The implementation of consensual tenet in modern civil procedure: A European approach of court-related amicable dispute resolution procedures
Background: This article explores the global changes in the orientation of civil procedure from competitive and adversarial towards more cooperative and consensual models. It aims to identify the reflection of mentioned tendencies in the valid legal regulation and practice of modern civil procedure. The consensual tenet in the civil process is analysed from the perspective of civil procedure goals, settlement principle, and case management as an effective tool for implementing the latter in practice. The authors explore the court-related amicable dispute resolution procedures to see the similarities and differences. Methods: Research commenced with a review of the existing scientific literature, a brief historical analysis, and a document analysis concerning changes in civil procedure orientation towards less competitive and more cooperation-grounded resolution of civil disputes. This research was followed by the comparative study of court-related amicable dispute resolution procedures with examples in particular legal jurisdictions like Austria, Lithuania, and Ukraine. Results and Conclusions: Vital changes in the perception of civil procedure regarding the widely accepted need to foster settlements in civil disputes, and an analysis of the most commonly used procedures as court conciliation and court mediation, were presented in this paper. The authors distinguish and analyse three court-related amicable dispute resolution procedures – conciliation, mediation, and the amicable conciliation process, emphasising their peculiarities and features. This research assists dispute resolution practitioners and researchers interested in better understanding how different court-related amicable dispute resolution procedures can be implemented in legal regulation and practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
50.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Challenges of Legal Guarantees for the Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in International Commercial Cases Advancing Sustainable Justice through AI-Based Case Law Analysis The Implementation of Consensual Tenet in Modern Civil Procedure: Comparative Analysis of Court-Connected Settlement Procedures Applied in Austria, Lithuania, and Ukraine Human Trafficking in Western Balkan: Case Study of Kosovo Towards an Effective Legal Protection for Older Persons in the 21st Century: A Comparative Study of International Human Rights Law and Arab Constitutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1