维持北澳大利亚地区增长的区域人口和经济挑战

IF 1.7 Q2 GEOGRAPHY Regional Studies Regional Science Pub Date : 2022-06-17 DOI:10.1080/21681376.2022.2082316
A. Taylor, James Thurmer, Dávid Karácsonyi
{"title":"维持北澳大利亚地区增长的区域人口和经济挑战","authors":"A. Taylor, James Thurmer, Dávid Karácsonyi","doi":"10.1080/21681376.2022.2082316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Stimulating economic and population growth in northern Australia has been a long-term pursuit for the Australian Government, where the north has historically been the focus for centrally derived regional development policies. Most refer to untapping the purportedly vast opportunities of the resources and tourism sectors, and growth in the Asian middle-class in Australia’s proximate north. In 2015 the Australian government detailed an ambitious policy for ‘developing the north’ during the period 2015–60. This includes targets to dramatically grow the population and a list of five industries with ‘bright growth prospects’. However, regional develpment literature underscores there have been many impediments to generating sustained growth in northern regions of developed countries. This study is the first to evaluate baseline conditions and progress towards the aims and targets in the Australian regional growth policy. We develop key analytical indicators and provide analysis by 11 subregions within Northern Australia to ascertain the extent and implications of indicator diversity. The results highlight challenges for the policy’s aims as well as regional differences in the compositions of economies and populations. In demonstrating the incorrect and implied assertion of regional homogeneity, and by demonstrating that some targets were destined to fail from inception, we underscore the importance of knowledge about localized demographic and economic conditions in policy formulation. This brings into play the important question of whether high-growth policies for northern regions is desired by the longer term resident population, and most particularly the relatively large population of Indigenous northern residents.","PeriodicalId":46370,"journal":{"name":"Regional Studies Regional Science","volume":"9 1","pages":"425 - 445"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regional demographic and economic challenges for sustaining growth in Northern Australia\",\"authors\":\"A. Taylor, James Thurmer, Dávid Karácsonyi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21681376.2022.2082316\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Stimulating economic and population growth in northern Australia has been a long-term pursuit for the Australian Government, where the north has historically been the focus for centrally derived regional development policies. Most refer to untapping the purportedly vast opportunities of the resources and tourism sectors, and growth in the Asian middle-class in Australia’s proximate north. In 2015 the Australian government detailed an ambitious policy for ‘developing the north’ during the period 2015–60. This includes targets to dramatically grow the population and a list of five industries with ‘bright growth prospects’. However, regional develpment literature underscores there have been many impediments to generating sustained growth in northern regions of developed countries. This study is the first to evaluate baseline conditions and progress towards the aims and targets in the Australian regional growth policy. We develop key analytical indicators and provide analysis by 11 subregions within Northern Australia to ascertain the extent and implications of indicator diversity. The results highlight challenges for the policy’s aims as well as regional differences in the compositions of economies and populations. In demonstrating the incorrect and implied assertion of regional homogeneity, and by demonstrating that some targets were destined to fail from inception, we underscore the importance of knowledge about localized demographic and economic conditions in policy formulation. This brings into play the important question of whether high-growth policies for northern regions is desired by the longer term resident population, and most particularly the relatively large population of Indigenous northern residents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Regional Studies Regional Science\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"425 - 445\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Regional Studies Regional Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2022.2082316\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Studies Regional Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21681376.2022.2082316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

刺激澳大利亚北部的经济和人口增长一直是澳大利亚政府的长期追求,历史上北部一直是中央衍生的区域发展政策的重点。大多数人指的是开发据称巨大的资源和旅游业机会,以及澳大利亚北部邻近地区亚洲中产阶级的增长。2015年,澳大利亚政府详细制定了一项雄心勃勃的政策,在2015 - 60年期间“发展北方”。其中包括大幅增加人口的目标,以及列出“发展前景光明”的五大行业。然而,区域发展文献强调,在发达国家北部地区实现持续增长存在许多障碍。这项研究是第一个评估基线条件和进展朝着澳大利亚区域增长政策的目标和目标。我们制定了关键的分析指标,并对北澳大利亚的11个次区域进行了分析,以确定指标多样性的程度和影响。研究结果凸显了该政策目标面临的挑战,以及经济和人口构成的地区差异。通过证明不正确和隐含的区域同质性主张,并通过证明一些目标从一开始就注定要失败,我们强调了在制定政策时了解当地人口和经济状况的重要性。这就产生了一个重要的问题,即长期居住人口,特别是相对庞大的北方土著居民,是否希望对北方地区实行高增长政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Regional demographic and economic challenges for sustaining growth in Northern Australia
ABSTRACT Stimulating economic and population growth in northern Australia has been a long-term pursuit for the Australian Government, where the north has historically been the focus for centrally derived regional development policies. Most refer to untapping the purportedly vast opportunities of the resources and tourism sectors, and growth in the Asian middle-class in Australia’s proximate north. In 2015 the Australian government detailed an ambitious policy for ‘developing the north’ during the period 2015–60. This includes targets to dramatically grow the population and a list of five industries with ‘bright growth prospects’. However, regional develpment literature underscores there have been many impediments to generating sustained growth in northern regions of developed countries. This study is the first to evaluate baseline conditions and progress towards the aims and targets in the Australian regional growth policy. We develop key analytical indicators and provide analysis by 11 subregions within Northern Australia to ascertain the extent and implications of indicator diversity. The results highlight challenges for the policy’s aims as well as regional differences in the compositions of economies and populations. In demonstrating the incorrect and implied assertion of regional homogeneity, and by demonstrating that some targets were destined to fail from inception, we underscore the importance of knowledge about localized demographic and economic conditions in policy formulation. This brings into play the important question of whether high-growth policies for northern regions is desired by the longer term resident population, and most particularly the relatively large population of Indigenous northern residents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
15.80%
发文量
49
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Regional Studies, Regional Science is an interdisciplinary open access journal from the Regional Studies Association, first published in 2014. We particularly welcome submissions from authors working on regional issues in geography, economics, planning, and political science. The journal features a streamlined peer-review process and quick turnaround times from submission to acceptance. Authors will normally receive a decision on their manuscript within 60 days of submission.
期刊最新文献
Social vulnerability and local economic outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic The diffusion of digital skills across EU regions: structural drivers and polarisation dynamics The geographical dimension of income inequality in Greece: evolution and the ‘turning point’ after the economic crisis Italian cultural and creative industries following the Great Recession: an exploration of the local determinants of growth Inter-temporal co-evolution of divergent economic activities and spatial economic resilience embedded in informal institutions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1