印尼10家最大银行盈利能力和营销的数据包络分析

Jmv Mulyadi
{"title":"印尼10家最大银行盈利能力和营销的数据包络分析","authors":"Jmv Mulyadi","doi":"10.14414/TIAR.V9I2.1817","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The higher competition in banking industry has pushed the banks to increase efficiency both their profitability and marketing. This study aims to assess the efficiency of the 10 largest banks in Indonesia both in terms of profitability and marketing period 2017-2018 using the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method. The results show that from 2017 to 2018, there were 7 banks that consistently obtained good profitability levels. The average bank profitability performance decreased from 2017 to 2018. From the marketing side, with the first input approach, during 2017-2018 there were only 6 banks that consistently obtained good levels of efficiency, while with the second input approach, there were only 5 banks that consistently achieved good efficiency. The average bank marketing performance declined from 2017 to 2018 using the first and second approaches. In general, bank performance in marketing is still below the bank performance in profitability. The implication is that in using DEA, it must be wise in selecting the input variables because they will produce different values.","PeriodicalId":33908,"journal":{"name":"Indonesian Accounting Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data envelopment analysis for profitability and marketing in the 10 largest banks in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Jmv Mulyadi\",\"doi\":\"10.14414/TIAR.V9I2.1817\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The higher competition in banking industry has pushed the banks to increase efficiency both their profitability and marketing. This study aims to assess the efficiency of the 10 largest banks in Indonesia both in terms of profitability and marketing period 2017-2018 using the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method. The results show that from 2017 to 2018, there were 7 banks that consistently obtained good profitability levels. The average bank profitability performance decreased from 2017 to 2018. From the marketing side, with the first input approach, during 2017-2018 there were only 6 banks that consistently obtained good levels of efficiency, while with the second input approach, there were only 5 banks that consistently achieved good efficiency. The average bank marketing performance declined from 2017 to 2018 using the first and second approaches. In general, bank performance in marketing is still below the bank performance in profitability. The implication is that in using DEA, it must be wise in selecting the input variables because they will produce different values.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33908,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indonesian Accounting Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indonesian Accounting Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14414/TIAR.V9I2.1817\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indonesian Accounting Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14414/TIAR.V9I2.1817","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

银行业竞争加剧,促使银行提高盈利能力和营销效率。本研究旨在使用数据包络分析(DEA)方法评估印度尼西亚10家最大银行在2017-2018年盈利能力和营销期间的效率。结果显示,2017年至2018年,有7家银行持续获得良好的盈利水平。2017年至2018年,银行的平均盈利能力表现有所下降。从营销方面来看,在第一种投入方式下,2017-2018年期间,只有6家银行始终获得良好的效率,而在第二种投入方式中,只有5家银行始终达到良好的效率。使用第一种和第二种方法,2017年至2018年,银行的平均营销业绩有所下降。总的来说,银行在营销方面的表现仍低于银行在盈利方面的表现。这意味着,在使用DEA时,选择输入变量必须是明智的,因为它们会产生不同的值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Data envelopment analysis for profitability and marketing in the 10 largest banks in Indonesia
The higher competition in banking industry has pushed the banks to increase efficiency both their profitability and marketing. This study aims to assess the efficiency of the 10 largest banks in Indonesia both in terms of profitability and marketing period 2017-2018 using the Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) method. The results show that from 2017 to 2018, there were 7 banks that consistently obtained good profitability levels. The average bank profitability performance decreased from 2017 to 2018. From the marketing side, with the first input approach, during 2017-2018 there were only 6 banks that consistently obtained good levels of efficiency, while with the second input approach, there were only 5 banks that consistently achieved good efficiency. The average bank marketing performance declined from 2017 to 2018 using the first and second approaches. In general, bank performance in marketing is still below the bank performance in profitability. The implication is that in using DEA, it must be wise in selecting the input variables because they will produce different values.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Back Matter The Indonesian Accounting Review Vol 13 No 1 Front Matter The Indonesian Accounting Review Vol 13 No 1 Accountability of village fund management during the covid-19 pandemic (Study on village government in Dayun District, Siak Regency) New accounting ideology as the efforts of preventing the fraudulent financial reporting Strategies affecting sustainable financial performance (A case study on southeast asian companies)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1