加纳GNSS基线解决方案分析

IF 0.3 Q4 REMOTE SENSING South African Journal of Geomatics Pub Date : 2022-09-09 DOI:10.4314/sajg.v8i1.1
Osman Mohammed Abukari1, Akwasi Acheampong, C. Fosu
{"title":"加纳GNSS基线解决方案分析","authors":"Osman Mohammed Abukari1, Akwasi Acheampong, C. Fosu","doi":"10.4314/sajg.v8i1.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accuracy is highly desired in all geodetic and mapping projects. Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) has many positioning capabilities which can produce the desired accuracies needed for establishing Ground Control Points (GCPs). However accuracy of positioning results from GNSS survey routines are influenced by session duration and baseline length. This study is targeted at determining optimum observation times for specific baseline lengths for GCP fixing and densification in Ghana. The study used four ground stations in Accra, Kumasi, Assin-Fosu and Sunyani. Each station was occupied for a total of four hours on three different days and the data were later split into various time segments to obtain different data sets. Using the Kumasi station as base, each of the baselines was processed three times for each of 3-day 4-hour observation sessions and the mean results accepted as the ‘true’ position values. Repeatability tests were carried out on the computed baselines and the ratios ranged between 1:1,141,100 and 1:4,918,000. All comparisons were based on the true position values. Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and accuracies were computed from the differences. A plot of the RMSE against time showed that accuracy of positions continued to improve but after 50 minutes of observation there was no significant improvement in the accuracy of measured baselines. This study therefore set 50 minutes as the optimum duration for GNSS baselines up to 195km when using geodetic grade GNSS receivers in differential mode to establish GCPs.","PeriodicalId":43854,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Geomatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of GNSS baseline solutions in Ghana\",\"authors\":\"Osman Mohammed Abukari1, Akwasi Acheampong, C. Fosu\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/sajg.v8i1.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Accuracy is highly desired in all geodetic and mapping projects. Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) has many positioning capabilities which can produce the desired accuracies needed for establishing Ground Control Points (GCPs). However accuracy of positioning results from GNSS survey routines are influenced by session duration and baseline length. This study is targeted at determining optimum observation times for specific baseline lengths for GCP fixing and densification in Ghana. The study used four ground stations in Accra, Kumasi, Assin-Fosu and Sunyani. Each station was occupied for a total of four hours on three different days and the data were later split into various time segments to obtain different data sets. Using the Kumasi station as base, each of the baselines was processed three times for each of 3-day 4-hour observation sessions and the mean results accepted as the ‘true’ position values. Repeatability tests were carried out on the computed baselines and the ratios ranged between 1:1,141,100 and 1:4,918,000. All comparisons were based on the true position values. Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and accuracies were computed from the differences. A plot of the RMSE against time showed that accuracy of positions continued to improve but after 50 minutes of observation there was no significant improvement in the accuracy of measured baselines. This study therefore set 50 minutes as the optimum duration for GNSS baselines up to 195km when using geodetic grade GNSS receivers in differential mode to establish GCPs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"South African Journal of Geomatics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"South African Journal of Geomatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/sajg.v8i1.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"REMOTE SENSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Geomatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/sajg.v8i1.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在所有大地测量和测绘项目中,精度都是非常需要的。全球导航卫星系统(GNSS)具有许多定位能力,可以产生建立地面控制点(gcp)所需的所需精度。然而,GNSS测量程序的定位结果的准确性受到会话持续时间和基线长度的影响。本研究旨在确定加纳GCP固定和致密化的特定基线长度的最佳观察时间。这项研究使用了阿克拉、库马西、阿辛-福苏和苏尼亚尼的四个地面站。每个台站在三个不同的日子里总共占用了四个小时,然后将数据分成不同的时间段,以获得不同的数据集。以库马西站为基础,每条基线在每3天4小时的观测时段内处理3次,并接受平均值结果作为“真实”位置值。在计算的基线上进行了重复性测试,比率在1:11 . 141 100和1:4 . 918 000之间。所有的比较都是基于真实的位置值。均方根误差(RMSE)和准确度由差异计算。RMSE随时间变化的图显示,位置的精度继续提高,但在观察50分钟后,测量基线的精度没有显着提高。因此,本研究在差分模式下使用大地级GNSS接收机建立gcp时,将50分钟作为GNSS基线至195km的最佳持续时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Analysis of GNSS baseline solutions in Ghana
Accuracy is highly desired in all geodetic and mapping projects. Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) has many positioning capabilities which can produce the desired accuracies needed for establishing Ground Control Points (GCPs). However accuracy of positioning results from GNSS survey routines are influenced by session duration and baseline length. This study is targeted at determining optimum observation times for specific baseline lengths for GCP fixing and densification in Ghana. The study used four ground stations in Accra, Kumasi, Assin-Fosu and Sunyani. Each station was occupied for a total of four hours on three different days and the data were later split into various time segments to obtain different data sets. Using the Kumasi station as base, each of the baselines was processed three times for each of 3-day 4-hour observation sessions and the mean results accepted as the ‘true’ position values. Repeatability tests were carried out on the computed baselines and the ratios ranged between 1:1,141,100 and 1:4,918,000. All comparisons were based on the true position values. Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and accuracies were computed from the differences. A plot of the RMSE against time showed that accuracy of positions continued to improve but after 50 minutes of observation there was no significant improvement in the accuracy of measured baselines. This study therefore set 50 minutes as the optimum duration for GNSS baselines up to 195km when using geodetic grade GNSS receivers in differential mode to establish GCPs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊最新文献
Classification of 3D Sonar Point Clouds derived Underwater using Machine and Deep Learning (CANUPO and RandLA-Net) Approaches Characterising the evolution of the urban form of zones that accommodate warehousing clusters in the City of Cape Town municipality Error Analysis in Multibeam Hydrographic Survey System Temporal Characterization of Land Use Change and Land-scape Processes in Informal Settlements in the City of Cape Town, South Africa Analysis of thermally-induced displacements of the HartRAO Lunar Laser Ranger optical tube: impact on pointing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1