大剂量氨甲环酸能在经尿道前列腺电切术中发挥作用吗?一项随机对照试验

IF 1.3 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Arab Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2021-06-03 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1080/2090598X.2021.1932125
Mohamed Samir, Ahmed M Saafan, Rania M Afifi, Ahmed Tawfick
{"title":"大剂量氨甲环酸能在经尿道前列腺电切术中发挥作用吗?一项随机对照试验","authors":"Mohamed Samir, Ahmed M Saafan, Rania M Afifi, Ahmed Tawfick","doi":"10.1080/2090598X.2021.1932125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of high-dose tranexamic acid (TXA) during bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP) in patients with large prostates compared to placebo.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>From February 2018 to May 2020, 204 patients with enlarged prostates of 80-130 g and in need of surgical intervention were randomised into two groups. Patients in Group A underwent B-TURP and received TXA as an intravenous loading dose of 50 mg/kg over 20 min before induction of anaesthesia followed by a maintenance infusion of 5 mg/kg/h until resection was completed. The patients in Group B (placebo) received a saline infusion of a similar volume.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was highly significant drop in haemoglobin in the placebo group at 4- and 24-h postoperatively compared with the TXA group (<i>P</i> < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the blood transfusion rate between the two groups with five patients (5.5%) in the placebo group and four (4.2%) in the TXA group requiring a transfusion (<i>P</i> = 0.74). The procedural time was significantly less in the TXA group vs the control group, at a mean (SD) of 79.93 (22.18) vs 90.91 (21.4) min (<i>P</i> = 0.001). Also, the intraoperative irrigation fluid volume and postoperative irrigation duration were significantly less in the TXA group vs the control group, at a mean (SD) of 19.21 (3.13) vs 23.05 (3.8) L and 14.75 (5.15) vs 18.33 (5.96) h, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.001). Catheterisation and hospital stay durations were comparable between both groups (<i>P</i> = 0.384 and <i>P</i> = 0.388, respectively). No complications were recorded with use of high-dose TXA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-dose TXA was effective in controlling blood loss during B-TURP in patients with large prostates, with no adverse drug reactions.</p>","PeriodicalId":8113,"journal":{"name":"Arab Journal of Urology","volume":"20 1","pages":"24-29"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8881071/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can high-dose tranexamic acid have a role during transurethral resection of the prostate in large prostates? A randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Mohamed Samir, Ahmed M Saafan, Rania M Afifi, Ahmed Tawfick\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2090598X.2021.1932125\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the efficacy and safety of high-dose tranexamic acid (TXA) during bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP) in patients with large prostates compared to placebo.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>From February 2018 to May 2020, 204 patients with enlarged prostates of 80-130 g and in need of surgical intervention were randomised into two groups. Patients in Group A underwent B-TURP and received TXA as an intravenous loading dose of 50 mg/kg over 20 min before induction of anaesthesia followed by a maintenance infusion of 5 mg/kg/h until resection was completed. The patients in Group B (placebo) received a saline infusion of a similar volume.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was highly significant drop in haemoglobin in the placebo group at 4- and 24-h postoperatively compared with the TXA group (<i>P</i> < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the blood transfusion rate between the two groups with five patients (5.5%) in the placebo group and four (4.2%) in the TXA group requiring a transfusion (<i>P</i> = 0.74). The procedural time was significantly less in the TXA group vs the control group, at a mean (SD) of 79.93 (22.18) vs 90.91 (21.4) min (<i>P</i> = 0.001). Also, the intraoperative irrigation fluid volume and postoperative irrigation duration were significantly less in the TXA group vs the control group, at a mean (SD) of 19.21 (3.13) vs 23.05 (3.8) L and 14.75 (5.15) vs 18.33 (5.96) h, respectively (<i>P</i> = 0.001). Catheterisation and hospital stay durations were comparable between both groups (<i>P</i> = 0.384 and <i>P</i> = 0.388, respectively). No complications were recorded with use of high-dose TXA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High-dose TXA was effective in controlling blood loss during B-TURP in patients with large prostates, with no adverse drug reactions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Arab Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"24-29\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8881071/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Arab Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2021.1932125\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2090598X.2021.1932125","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目的与安慰剂相比,评估大剂量氨甲环酸(TXA)在双极经尿道前列腺电切术(B-TURP)治疗大前列腺患者的疗效和安全性。患者和方法从2018年2月至2020年5月,204名前列腺增生80-130 g且需要手术干预的患者被随机分为两组。A组患者接受了B-TURP,并在麻醉诱导前20分钟内接受50 mg/kg的TXA静脉负荷剂量,随后维持5 mg/kg的输注,直到切除完成。B组(安慰剂组)的患者接受了类似体积的生理盐水输注。结果与TXA组比较,安慰剂组术后4、24小时血红蛋白下降显著(P<0.001),两组之间的输血率没有显著差异,安慰剂组有5名患者(5.5%),TXA组有4名患者(4.2%)需要输血(P=0.074)。TXA组的手术时间明显少于对照组,平均(SD)为79.93(22.18)vs 90.91(21.4)min(P=0.001)。此外,TXA组术中冲洗液量和术后冲洗时间明显少于对照组,平均(SD)分别为19.21(3.13)vs 23.05(3.8)L和14.75(5.15)vs 18.33(5.96)h(P=0.001)。使用高剂量TXA无并发症记录。结论大剂量TXA可有效控制前列腺增生患者经尿道前列腺电切术中的出血,无不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can high-dose tranexamic acid have a role during transurethral resection of the prostate in large prostates? A randomised controlled trial.

Objectives: To assess the efficacy and safety of high-dose tranexamic acid (TXA) during bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP) in patients with large prostates compared to placebo.

Patients and methods: From February 2018 to May 2020, 204 patients with enlarged prostates of 80-130 g and in need of surgical intervention were randomised into two groups. Patients in Group A underwent B-TURP and received TXA as an intravenous loading dose of 50 mg/kg over 20 min before induction of anaesthesia followed by a maintenance infusion of 5 mg/kg/h until resection was completed. The patients in Group B (placebo) received a saline infusion of a similar volume.

Results: There was highly significant drop in haemoglobin in the placebo group at 4- and 24-h postoperatively compared with the TXA group (P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the blood transfusion rate between the two groups with five patients (5.5%) in the placebo group and four (4.2%) in the TXA group requiring a transfusion (P = 0.74). The procedural time was significantly less in the TXA group vs the control group, at a mean (SD) of 79.93 (22.18) vs 90.91 (21.4) min (P = 0.001). Also, the intraoperative irrigation fluid volume and postoperative irrigation duration were significantly less in the TXA group vs the control group, at a mean (SD) of 19.21 (3.13) vs 23.05 (3.8) L and 14.75 (5.15) vs 18.33 (5.96) h, respectively (P = 0.001). Catheterisation and hospital stay durations were comparable between both groups (P = 0.384 and P = 0.388, respectively). No complications were recorded with use of high-dose TXA.

Conclusion: High-dose TXA was effective in controlling blood loss during B-TURP in patients with large prostates, with no adverse drug reactions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Arab Journal of Urology
Arab Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: The Arab Journal of Urology is a peer-reviewed journal that strives to provide a high standard of research and clinical material to the widest possible urological community worldwide. The journal encompasses all aspects of urology including: urological oncology, urological reconstructive surgery, urodynamics, female urology, pediatric urology, endourology, transplantation, erectile dysfunction, and urinary infections and inflammations. The journal provides reviews, original articles, editorials, surgical techniques, cases reports and correspondence. Urologists, oncologists, pathologists, radiologists and scientists are invited to submit their contributions to make the Arab Journal of Urology a viable international forum for the practical, timely and state-of-the-art clinical urology and basic urological research.
期刊最新文献
Comparative study of two techniques of laparoscopic burch colposuspension using sutures versus mesh in women with genuine stress urinary incontinence. Assessment of stone ablation rate using the Moses technology modes with different energy and pulse settings: An experimental study Mini-PCNL – a boon for CKD patients with nephrolithiasis Sixth edition of the World Health Organization laboratory manual of semen analysis: Updates and essential take away for busy clinicians Varicocele and male infertility conundrum: Making sense of a never-ending story for the busy clinician
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1