{"title":"新西兰奥特亚传统生态知识与环境人文关系方法","authors":"Scott D. Hess","doi":"10.1353/srm.2023.0003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This essay contrasts the objective approach to environment by European explorers and settlers in Aotearoa New Zealand with the relational orientation of indigenous Māori people. European material \"improvement,\" scientific study, and aesthetic appreciation cohered around a shared ideology of objectivity as part of the larger Romantic-era expansion of imperial capitalism. This subject–object separation contrasts with the relational paradigm of Traditional Ecological Knowledge, in which acts of knowing (re)situate humans within their environments in order to maintain and restore relations. The essay argues for a relational approach to the environmental humanities analogous to the relationality of Traditional Ecological Knowledge.","PeriodicalId":44848,"journal":{"name":"STUDIES IN ROMANTICISM","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Aotearoa New Zealand, Traditional Ecological Knowledge, and a Relational Method for the Environmental Humanities\",\"authors\":\"Scott D. Hess\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/srm.2023.0003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This essay contrasts the objective approach to environment by European explorers and settlers in Aotearoa New Zealand with the relational orientation of indigenous Māori people. European material \\\"improvement,\\\" scientific study, and aesthetic appreciation cohered around a shared ideology of objectivity as part of the larger Romantic-era expansion of imperial capitalism. This subject–object separation contrasts with the relational paradigm of Traditional Ecological Knowledge, in which acts of knowing (re)situate humans within their environments in order to maintain and restore relations. The essay argues for a relational approach to the environmental humanities analogous to the relationality of Traditional Ecological Knowledge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"STUDIES IN ROMANTICISM\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"STUDIES IN ROMANTICISM\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/srm.2023.0003\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"STUDIES IN ROMANTICISM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/srm.2023.0003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Aotearoa New Zealand, Traditional Ecological Knowledge, and a Relational Method for the Environmental Humanities
Abstract:This essay contrasts the objective approach to environment by European explorers and settlers in Aotearoa New Zealand with the relational orientation of indigenous Māori people. European material "improvement," scientific study, and aesthetic appreciation cohered around a shared ideology of objectivity as part of the larger Romantic-era expansion of imperial capitalism. This subject–object separation contrasts with the relational paradigm of Traditional Ecological Knowledge, in which acts of knowing (re)situate humans within their environments in order to maintain and restore relations. The essay argues for a relational approach to the environmental humanities analogous to the relationality of Traditional Ecological Knowledge.
期刊介绍：
Studies in Romanticism was founded in 1961 by David Bonnell Green at a time when it was still possible to wonder whether "romanticism" was a term worth theorizing (as Morse Peckham deliberated in the first essay of the first number). It seemed that it was, and, ever since, SiR (as it is known to abbreviation) has flourished under a fine succession of editors: Edwin Silverman, W. H. Stevenson, Charles Stone III, Michael Cooke, Morton Palet, and (continuously since 1978) David Wagenknecht. There are other fine journals in which scholars of romanticism feel it necessary to appear - and over the years there are a few important scholars of the period who have not been represented there by important work.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
