3X3篮球进攻的发生率和成功率:按首发动作和年龄/性别分类的比较

IF 0.2 Q4 SPORT SCIENCES Kinesiologia Slovenica Pub Date : 2023-07-27 DOI:10.52165/kinsi.29.2.40-49
Haruhiko Madarame
{"title":"3X3篮球进攻的发生率和成功率:按首发动作和年龄/性别分类的比较","authors":"Haruhiko Madarame","doi":"10.52165/kinsi.29.2.40-49","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study compared offensive plays’ incidence and success rates in 3x3 basketball by starting actions and age/sex categories (senior men, senior women, under-18 men, and under-18 women). One hundred and ninety-one games from the FIBA 3x3 Under-18 World Cup 2019 and the FIBA 3x3 World Cup 2019 were analyzed. Offensive plays were classified into three types according to their starting actions: check-ball offensive plays (CBOP), transition offensive plays (TOP), or offensive rebound offensive plays (OROP). Offensive plays resulting in a successful field goal or an earned free throw were considered successful. Pearson’s chi-squared test was used to compare the success rates of offensive plays between starting actions and between categories. The Benjamini-Hochberg method was applied to ensure a significance level of 0.05. Cohen’s w was calculated as an effect size for the chi-squared test. TOP occurred with the highest frequency (55.1-57.5% of the totals) in all four categories, followed by CBOP (28.1-31.2%) and OROP (11.9-14.7%). The success rates of OROP (39.2-49.2%) were significantly higher (p < 0.05, w = 0.07-0.14) than those of TOP (28.5-36.4%) and CBOP (32.1-35.0%) in all categories. Improving the success rate of TOP is crucial to increase the chance of winning a game because TOP accounts for more than half of the total offensive plays. While the incidence of OROP was the lowest among the three offensive plays, the success rate of OROP was higher than that of TOP and CBOP, indicating the importance of acquiring offensive rebounds in 3x3 basketball.","PeriodicalId":43206,"journal":{"name":"Kinesiologia Slovenica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"INCIDENCE AND SUCCESS RATES OF OFFENSIVE PLAYS IN 3X3 BASKETBALL: COMPARISONS BY STARTING ACTIONS AND AGE/SEX CATEGORIES\",\"authors\":\"Haruhiko Madarame\",\"doi\":\"10.52165/kinsi.29.2.40-49\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study compared offensive plays’ incidence and success rates in 3x3 basketball by starting actions and age/sex categories (senior men, senior women, under-18 men, and under-18 women). One hundred and ninety-one games from the FIBA 3x3 Under-18 World Cup 2019 and the FIBA 3x3 World Cup 2019 were analyzed. Offensive plays were classified into three types according to their starting actions: check-ball offensive plays (CBOP), transition offensive plays (TOP), or offensive rebound offensive plays (OROP). Offensive plays resulting in a successful field goal or an earned free throw were considered successful. Pearson’s chi-squared test was used to compare the success rates of offensive plays between starting actions and between categories. The Benjamini-Hochberg method was applied to ensure a significance level of 0.05. Cohen’s w was calculated as an effect size for the chi-squared test. TOP occurred with the highest frequency (55.1-57.5% of the totals) in all four categories, followed by CBOP (28.1-31.2%) and OROP (11.9-14.7%). The success rates of OROP (39.2-49.2%) were significantly higher (p < 0.05, w = 0.07-0.14) than those of TOP (28.5-36.4%) and CBOP (32.1-35.0%) in all categories. Improving the success rate of TOP is crucial to increase the chance of winning a game because TOP accounts for more than half of the total offensive plays. While the incidence of OROP was the lowest among the three offensive plays, the success rate of OROP was higher than that of TOP and CBOP, indicating the importance of acquiring offensive rebounds in 3x3 basketball.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43206,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kinesiologia Slovenica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kinesiologia Slovenica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52165/kinsi.29.2.40-49\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kinesiologia Slovenica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52165/kinsi.29.2.40-49","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这项研究通过首发动作和年龄/性别类别(老年男性、老年女性、18岁以下男性和18岁以下女性)比较了3x3篮球的进攻发生率和成功率。分析了2019年国际篮联3x3 18岁以下世界杯和2019年国际足联3x3世界杯的191场比赛。进攻打法根据其起始动作分为三种类型:检查球进攻打法(CBOP)、过渡进攻打法(TOP)或进攻篮板进攻打法(OROP)。进攻性打法导致一个成功的投篮或一个赢得的罚球被认为是成功的。皮尔逊卡方检验用于比较首发动作和类别之间进攻的成功率。Benjamini Hochberg方法用于确保0.05的显著性水平。Cohen的w被计算为卡方检验的效应大小。TOP发生率最高(占总数的55.1-57.5%),其次是CBOP(28.1-31.2%)和OROP(11.9-14.7%)。OROP的成功率(39.2-49.2%)显著高于TOP(28.5-36.4%)和CBOP(32.1-35.0%)。提高TOP的成功率对于增加赢得比赛的机会至关重要,因为TOP占总进攻的一半以上。虽然OROP的发生率在三种进攻打法中最低,但OROP的成功率高于TOP和CBOP,这表明在3x3篮球中获得进攻篮板的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
INCIDENCE AND SUCCESS RATES OF OFFENSIVE PLAYS IN 3X3 BASKETBALL: COMPARISONS BY STARTING ACTIONS AND AGE/SEX CATEGORIES
This study compared offensive plays’ incidence and success rates in 3x3 basketball by starting actions and age/sex categories (senior men, senior women, under-18 men, and under-18 women). One hundred and ninety-one games from the FIBA 3x3 Under-18 World Cup 2019 and the FIBA 3x3 World Cup 2019 were analyzed. Offensive plays were classified into three types according to their starting actions: check-ball offensive plays (CBOP), transition offensive plays (TOP), or offensive rebound offensive plays (OROP). Offensive plays resulting in a successful field goal or an earned free throw were considered successful. Pearson’s chi-squared test was used to compare the success rates of offensive plays between starting actions and between categories. The Benjamini-Hochberg method was applied to ensure a significance level of 0.05. Cohen’s w was calculated as an effect size for the chi-squared test. TOP occurred with the highest frequency (55.1-57.5% of the totals) in all four categories, followed by CBOP (28.1-31.2%) and OROP (11.9-14.7%). The success rates of OROP (39.2-49.2%) were significantly higher (p < 0.05, w = 0.07-0.14) than those of TOP (28.5-36.4%) and CBOP (32.1-35.0%) in all categories. Improving the success rate of TOP is crucial to increase the chance of winning a game because TOP accounts for more than half of the total offensive plays. While the incidence of OROP was the lowest among the three offensive plays, the success rate of OROP was higher than that of TOP and CBOP, indicating the importance of acquiring offensive rebounds in 3x3 basketball.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Kinesiologia Slovenica
Kinesiologia Slovenica SPORT SCIENCES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
RECOVERY PRACTICES OF SLOVENIAN SPORT CLIMBERS EFFECT OF MANIPULATION OF BASE OF SUPPORT ON CENTER OF PRESSURE: COMPARISON OF CHILDREN WITH AND WITHOUT INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY EXAMINING THE LINK BETWEEN MOTOR FITNESS AND MORPHOLOGY IN 10-YEAR-OLD CHILDREN COGNITIVE CHARACTERISTICS AND SOME FACTORS AFFECTING THE SPRINT AND MEMORY COURSE PERFORMANCE OF ORIENTEERS A COMPARISON OF REPEATED WINGATE BASED OF HIGH INTENSITY INTERVAL TRAINING AND MODERATE INTENSITY CONTINUOUS TRAINING ON AEROBIC CAPACITY UNDER NORMOBARIC HYPOXIA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1