用线性方法评估声散射矩阵的随机误差

IF 1.4 4区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL International Journal of Spray and Combustion Dynamics Pub Date : 2018-07-26 DOI:10.1177/1756827718789066
Luck Peerlings, F. Bake, Susann Boij, H. Bodén
{"title":"用线性方法评估声散射矩阵的随机误差","authors":"Luck Peerlings, F. Bake, Susann Boij, H. Bodén","doi":"10.1177/1756827718789066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To be able to compare the measured scattering matrices with model predictions, the quality of the measurements has to be known. Uncertainty analyses are invaluable to assess and improve the quality of measurement results in terms of accuracy and precision. Linear analyses are widespread, computationally fast and give information of the contribution of each error source to the overall measurement uncertainty; however, they cannot be applied in every situation. The purpose of this study is to determine if linear methods can be used to assess the quality of acoustic scattering matrices. The uncertainty in measured scattering matrices is assessed using a linear uncertainty analysis and the results are compared against Monte-Carlo simulations. It is shown that for plane waves, a linear uncertainty analysis, applied to the wave decomposition method, gives correct results when three conditions are satisfied. For higher order mode measurements, the number of conditions that have to be satisfied increases rapidly and the linear analysis becomes an unsuitable choice to determine the uncertainty on the scattering matrix coefficients. As the linear uncertainty analysis is most suitable for the plane wave range, an alternative linear method to assess the quality of the measurements is investigated. This method, based on matrix perturbation theory, gives qualitative information in the form of partial condition numbers and the implementation is straightforward. Using the alternative method, the measurements of higher order modes are analyzed and the observed difference in the measured reflection coefficients for different excitation conditions is explained by the disparity in modal amplitudes.","PeriodicalId":49046,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Spray and Combustion Dynamics","volume":"10 1","pages":"380 - 392"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1756827718789066","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the stochastic error of acoustic scattering matrices using linear methods\",\"authors\":\"Luck Peerlings, F. Bake, Susann Boij, H. Bodén\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1756827718789066\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To be able to compare the measured scattering matrices with model predictions, the quality of the measurements has to be known. Uncertainty analyses are invaluable to assess and improve the quality of measurement results in terms of accuracy and precision. Linear analyses are widespread, computationally fast and give information of the contribution of each error source to the overall measurement uncertainty; however, they cannot be applied in every situation. The purpose of this study is to determine if linear methods can be used to assess the quality of acoustic scattering matrices. The uncertainty in measured scattering matrices is assessed using a linear uncertainty analysis and the results are compared against Monte-Carlo simulations. It is shown that for plane waves, a linear uncertainty analysis, applied to the wave decomposition method, gives correct results when three conditions are satisfied. For higher order mode measurements, the number of conditions that have to be satisfied increases rapidly and the linear analysis becomes an unsuitable choice to determine the uncertainty on the scattering matrix coefficients. As the linear uncertainty analysis is most suitable for the plane wave range, an alternative linear method to assess the quality of the measurements is investigated. This method, based on matrix perturbation theory, gives qualitative information in the form of partial condition numbers and the implementation is straightforward. Using the alternative method, the measurements of higher order modes are analyzed and the observed difference in the measured reflection coefficients for different excitation conditions is explained by the disparity in modal amplitudes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49046,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Spray and Combustion Dynamics\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"380 - 392\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1756827718789066\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Spray and Combustion Dynamics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1756827718789066\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Spray and Combustion Dynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1756827718789066","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

为了能够将测量的散射矩阵与模型预测进行比较,必须知道测量的质量。不确定度分析对于评估和提高测量结果的准确性和精度是非常宝贵的。线性分析广泛,计算速度快,并提供每个误差源对整体测量不确定性的贡献信息;然而,它们不可能适用于所有情况。本研究的目的是确定是否可以使用线性方法来评估声散射矩阵的质量。使用线性不确定性分析评估测量散射矩阵的不确定性,并将结果与蒙特卡罗模拟进行比较。结果表明,对于平面波,当满足三个条件时,将线性不确定性分析应用于波分解方法,可以给出正确的结果。对于高阶模式测量,必须满足的条件数量迅速增加,并且线性分析成为确定散射矩阵系数不确定性的不合适选择。由于线性不确定度分析最适合平面波范围,因此研究了一种评估测量质量的替代线性方法。该方法基于矩阵摄动理论,以偏条件数的形式给出定性信息,实现简单。使用替代方法,分析了高阶模态的测量结果,并通过模态振幅的差异来解释不同激励条件下测量反射系数的观测差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessing the stochastic error of acoustic scattering matrices using linear methods
To be able to compare the measured scattering matrices with model predictions, the quality of the measurements has to be known. Uncertainty analyses are invaluable to assess and improve the quality of measurement results in terms of accuracy and precision. Linear analyses are widespread, computationally fast and give information of the contribution of each error source to the overall measurement uncertainty; however, they cannot be applied in every situation. The purpose of this study is to determine if linear methods can be used to assess the quality of acoustic scattering matrices. The uncertainty in measured scattering matrices is assessed using a linear uncertainty analysis and the results are compared against Monte-Carlo simulations. It is shown that for plane waves, a linear uncertainty analysis, applied to the wave decomposition method, gives correct results when three conditions are satisfied. For higher order mode measurements, the number of conditions that have to be satisfied increases rapidly and the linear analysis becomes an unsuitable choice to determine the uncertainty on the scattering matrix coefficients. As the linear uncertainty analysis is most suitable for the plane wave range, an alternative linear method to assess the quality of the measurements is investigated. This method, based on matrix perturbation theory, gives qualitative information in the form of partial condition numbers and the implementation is straightforward. Using the alternative method, the measurements of higher order modes are analyzed and the observed difference in the measured reflection coefficients for different excitation conditions is explained by the disparity in modal amplitudes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Spray and Combustion Dynamics
International Journal of Spray and Combustion Dynamics THERMODYNAMICS-ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
21
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Spray and Combustion Dynamics is a peer-reviewed open access journal on fundamental and applied research in combustion and spray dynamics. Fundamental topics include advances in understanding unsteady combustion, combustion instability and noise, flame-acoustic interaction and its active and passive control, duct acoustics...
期刊最新文献
Comparison of acoustic, optical, and heat release rate based flame transfer functions for a lean-burn injector under engine-like conditions Numerical study of the linear and non-linear damping in an acoustically forced cold-flow test rig with coupled cavities Intermittency transition to azimuthal instability in a turbulent annular combustor Network- and CFD/CAA-modelling of the high frequency flame response in multi-jet combustors Towards a momentum potential theory for reacting flows
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1